본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Perception and production of English fricative sounds by advanced Korean EFL learners

1

조회

0

다운로드

13

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

This study explored the perception and production of English voiceless fricatives among advanced Korean EFL learners by conducting on-line experiments. Thirty two college students who had overall high English proficiency participated in the experiments and nonce words beginning with one of the voiceless fricatives /f/, /th/, /s/, and /š/ were used in the experiments. In particular, 48 pairs of English nonce words, 24 identical (e.g., findert-findert, thomber-thomber) and non-identical pairs (e.g., findert-thindert, thomber-fomber) each, were employed in the perception test and the same 24 nonce words (e.g., findert, thimbert, simbert, shipkin; fomber, thombul, sombul, sholtem) were used in the production test. The results showed the precedence of perception over production but no correlation between them, indicating that the learners’ perceptual deficiency of target fricatives was not necessarily tied to their production defect of those sounds or vice versa. Importantly, the results from the perception test revealed that the participants had a great difficulty with the /f/-/th/ contrast, as opposed to the /s/-/š/ contrast. The participants’ ability to contrast between /th/ and /s/ was relatively good, unlike findings of previous studies (Joh and Lee 2001). As for production, the participants had most difficulty with the interdental fricative /th/ followed by /f/, but they did not have much difficulty with /s/ or /š/. Even though the results of the production test are overall consistent with those of the perception test, some discrepancy was found especially in the perception and production of /f/ and /th/. Further, replacement patterns in production were analyzed in terms of phonetic and/or articulatory properties of the target sounds and the L1 phonemic inventory. Some implications for the teaching of fricative sounds were also drawn.

Abstract

This study explored the perception and production of English voiceless fricatives among advanced Korean EFL learners by conducting on-line experiments. Thirty two college students who had overall high English proficiency participated in the experiments and nonce words beginning with one of the voiceless fricatives /f/, /th/, /s/, and /š/ were used in the experiments. In particular, 48 pairs of English nonce words, 24 identical (e.g., findert-findert, thomber-thomber) and non-identical pairs (e.g., findert-thindert, thomber-fomber) each, were employed in the perception test and the same 24 nonce words (e.g., findert, thimbert, simbert, shipkin; fomber, thombul, sombul, sholtem) were used in the production test. The results showed the precedence of perception over production but no correlation between them, indicating that the learners’ perceptual deficiency of target fricatives was not necessarily tied to their production defect of those sounds or vice versa. Importantly, the results from the perception test revealed that the participants had a great difficulty with the /f/-/th/ contrast, as opposed to the /s/-/š/ contrast. The participants’ ability to contrast between /th/ and /s/ was relatively good, unlike findings of previous studies (Joh and Lee 2001). As for production, the participants had most difficulty with the interdental fricative /th/ followed by /f/, but they did not have much difficulty with /s/ or /š/. Even though the results of the production test are overall consistent with those of the perception test, some discrepancy was found especially in the perception and production of /f/ and /th/. Further, replacement patterns in production were analyzed in terms of phonetic and/or articulatory properties of the target sounds and the L1 phonemic inventory. Some implications for the teaching of fricative sounds were also drawn.

참고문헌 (45)

  1. BASSETTI, "Orthographic input and second languagephonology", pp.2009, Multilingual Matters
  2. BEST, "A direct realist view of cross-language speechperception", pp.171~204 (1995), York Press
  3. BEST, CATHERINE, "Nonnative and secondlanguagespeech perception: Commonalities and complementarities, in Language Experience inSecond Language Speech Learning: In Honor of J. Flege", pp.13~34 (2007), John Benjamins
  4. BOHN, "Interlingualidentification and the role of foreign language experience in L2 vowelperception", Applied Psycholinguistics, 11, pp.303~328 (1990)
  5. BOHN, OCKE-SCHWEN, "Perception andproduction of a new vowel category by adult second language learners, in Second-Language SpeechStructure and Process", pp.53~73 (1997), de Gruyter
  6. BORDEN, "Productionand perception of the", r, l, pp.contrast in Korean adults learning English, Language Learning[DOI]
  7. CATFORD, JOHN CUNNISON, "Auditory vs.articulatory training in exotic sounds", Modern Language Journal, 54, pp.477~481 (1970)
  8. CELCE-MURCIA, "Teaching Pronunciation: A Reference for Teachers ofEnglish to Speakers of Other Languages" (2006), CambridgeUniversity Press
  9. 초미희, "Category Matching between English and Korean Consonants in Different Prosodic Environments", 영어영문학, 53(5), pp.731~753 (2007), 한국영어영문학회
  10. DINNSEN, "On the characterizationof a chain shift in normal and delayed phonological acquisition", Journal of Child Language, 25, pp.61~94 (1998)
  11. ECKMAN, "From phonemic differences to constraint rankings:Research on second language phonology", Studies in Second LanguageAcquisition, 26(4), pp.513~549 (2004)
  12. EDWARDS, "Applied Phonetics: The Sounds of AmericanEnglish" (2003), Thomson
  13. FLEGE, "The production of “new” and “similar” phonesin a foreign language: Evidence for the effect of equivalenceclassification", Journal of Phonetics, 15, pp.47~65 (1987)
  14. FLEGE, JAMES EMIL, "Second language speech learning: Theory,findings, and problems, in Speech Perceptionand Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-Language Research", pp.233~272 (1995), York Press
  15. FLEGE, JAMES EMIL, "Give input a chance, in Input Matters in SLA", pp.2009, Multilingual Matters
  16. FLEGE, JAMES EMIL, "Ageconstraints on second-language acquisition", Journal of Phonetics, 25, pp.169~186 (1999)
  17. FLEGE, JAMES EMIL, "Effects ofage of second language learning on the production of Englishconsonants", Speech Communication, 16, pp.1~26 (1995)
  18. FLEGE, JAMES EMIL, "The production andperception of English stops by Spanish speakers of English", Journal ofPhonetics, 15, pp.67~83 (1987)
  19. FRIEDA, "You are what you eatphonetically: The effect of linguistic experience on the perception offoreign vowels", pp.79~96 (2007), John Benjamins
  20. GNANADESIKAN, "Markedness and faithfulness constraintsin child phonology", pp.73~108 (2004), Cambridge University Press
  21. HEWINGS, "Pronunciation Plus:Practice Through Interaction" (1998), Cambridge University Press
  22. JENKINS, "The Phonology of English as an InternationalLanguage" (2000), Oxford University Press
  23. JOH, JEONGSOON, "Relationships between soundperception and production in L2 phonology acquisition", Journal of theApplied Linguistics, 17(2), pp.127~145 (2001)
  24. KENT, RAY, "Imitation of synthesized English and non-Englishvowels by children and adults", Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 8(1), pp.43~60 (1979)
  25. LADO, ROBERT, "Linguistics Across Cultures" (1957), University of Michigan Press
  26. 이신숙, "The influence of L2 experience on the perception of nonnative phonemic contrasts", 음성음운형태론연구, 16(1), pp.123~145 (2010), 한국음운론학회
  27. ShinsookLee, "Sound replacement in the acquisition of English consonant clusters: a constraint-based approach", 음성음운형태론연구, 8(2), pp.255~271 (2002), 한국음운론학회
  28. 이신숙, "The Production of English Sounds by Early Learners with Different English Learning Experience", 언어, 36(1), pp.215~241 (2011), 한국언어학회
  29. LLISTERRI, "Relationships between speech production andspeech perception in a second language", Proceedings of XIIIth International Congress ofPhonetic Science, 4, pp.92~99 (1995)
  30. LOGAN, "Training Japaneselisteners to identify English", r, l, pp.: A first report, Journal of theAcoustical Society of America[DOI]
  31. MACK, MOLLY, "Consonant and vowel perception and production:Early English-French bilinguals and English monolinguals", Perception & Psychophysics, 46(2), pp.187~200 (1989)
  32. MAJOR,ROY, "Foreign Accent: The Ontogeny and Phylogeny ofSecond Language Phonology" (2001), Lawrence ErlbaumAssociates Publishers
  33. MAJOR, ROY, "Transfer in second language phonology, in Phonology and SecondLanguage Acquisition", pp.63~94 (2008), JohnBenjamins
  34. MUNRO, "The study of secondlanguage speech: A brief overview", pp.3~11 (2007), John Benjamins
  35. OLLER, "The contrastive analysishypothesis and spelling errors", Language Learning, 20, pp.183~189 (1970)
  36. PATER, JOE, "Bridging the gap between receptive and productivedevelopment with minimally violable constraints", pp.219~244 (2004), Cambridge University Press
  37. ROCHET, "Perception and production of L2 speech soundsby adults", pp.379~410 (1995), York Press
  38. SHELDON, AMY, "The relationship between production and perceptionof the", r, l, pp.contrast in Korean adults learning English, Language Learning[DOI]
  39. SHELDON, AMY., "The acquisition of", r, l, pp.by Japanese learners of English: Evidence that speech productioncan precede speech perception, Applied Psycholinguistics[DOI]
  40. SMITH, NEILSON, "The Acquisition of Phonology: A Case Study" (1973), Cambridge University Press
  41. STREVENS, PETER, "Spectra of fricative noise in human speech", Language and Speech, 3, pp.32~49 (1960)
  42. SUNG, EUNKYUNG, "Flaps in American English and Korean:Production and Perception", 박사, pp.2003
  43. Eun-kyung Sung, "L2 sound perception and productionby Korean adults and children", 음성음운형태론연구, 12(3), pp.577~596 (2006), 한국음운론학회
  44. TRUBETZKOY, "Principles of Phonology" (1969), University of California Press
  45. YOUNG-SCHOLTEN, "Orthographic input in L2 phonologicaldevelopment", pp.263~279 (2002), Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)