Evaluation of the 1B Equation to Estimate Glomerular Filtration Rate in Pediatric Patients with Cancer
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The 1B equation is recommended for calculating the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in children. Since few reports have evaluated the performance of the 1B equation, we investigated the performance of estimated GFR (eGFR) equations with the blood urea nitrogen (BUN) variable for pediatric cancer patients. In total, 203 children with cancer who underwent measured GFR (mGFR) assessment were enrolled. The median (range) mGFR and eGFR calculated using the updated Schwartz equation were 118 (43–241) and 135 (34–257) mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively. The bias, precision (root mean square error [RMSE]), and accuracy (P30, mGFR±30%) of three eGFR equations including updated Schwartz, 1B, and full age spectrum (FAS) were compared. The median bias (mL/min/1.73 m2) was: updated Schwartz, 8.5; 1B, -9.0; and FAS, 4.2. The biases for all three eGFR equations were significantly different from zero. The P30 was: updated Schwartz, 63.5%; 1B, 66.0%; and FAS, 66.0%. The RMSE was the lowest for the 1B equation (40.4), followed by FAS (42.3), and updated Schwartz (45.5). The median eGFR/mGFR ratio for the eGFR equations decreased with age and reduced kidney functions (i.e., increased creatinine and BUN concentrations). The bias may be further reduced by using the average from two equations, such as the updated Schwartz and 1B, or FAS equation, rather than using the updated Schwartz or 1B equation alone. The use of the 1B equation may underestimate the GFR. Using creatinine and BUN variables in the eGFR equation may yield a more accurate estimate of the GFR in pediatric cancer patients.
Abstract
The 1B equation is recommended for calculating the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in children. Since few reports have evaluated the performance of the 1B equation, we investigated the performance of estimated GFR (eGFR) equations with the blood urea nitrogen (BUN) variable for pediatric cancer patients. In total, 203 children with cancer who underwent measured GFR (mGFR) assessment were enrolled. The median (range) mGFR and eGFR calculated using the updated Schwartz equation were 118 (43–241) and 135 (34–257) mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively. The bias, precision (root mean square error [RMSE]), and accuracy (P30, mGFR±30%) of three eGFR equations including updated Schwartz, 1B, and full age spectrum (FAS) were compared. The median bias (mL/min/1.73 m2) was: updated Schwartz, 8.5; 1B, -9.0; and FAS, 4.2. The biases for all three eGFR equations were significantly different from zero. The P30 was: updated Schwartz, 63.5%; 1B, 66.0%; and FAS, 66.0%. The RMSE was the lowest for the 1B equation (40.4), followed by FAS (42.3), and updated Schwartz (45.5). The median eGFR/mGFR ratio for the eGFR equations decreased with age and reduced kidney functions (i.e., increased creatinine and BUN concentrations). The bias may be further reduced by using the average from two equations, such as the updated Schwartz and 1B, or FAS equation, rather than using the updated Schwartz or 1B equation alone. The use of the 1B equation may underestimate the GFR. Using creatinine and BUN variables in the eGFR equation may yield a more accurate estimate of the GFR in pediatric cancer patients.
참고문헌 (17)
- Stevens LA, "Assessing kidney function--measured and estimated glomerular filtration rate", N Engl J Med, 354, pp.2473~2483 (2006)[DOI]
- Cole M, "Estimation of glomerular filtration rate in paediatric cancer patients using 51CREDTA population pharmacokinetics", Br J Cancer, 90, pp.60~64 (2004)[DOI]
- Mattman A, "Estimating pediatric glomerular filtration rates in the era of chronic kidney disease staging", J Am Soc Nephrol, 17, pp.487~496 (2006)[DOI]
- Levin A, "Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) CKD Work Group. KDIGO 2012 Clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease", Kidney Int Suppl, 3, pp.1~150 (2013)[DOI]
- Jeong TD, "Efficient reporting of the estimated glomerular filtration rate without height in pediatric patients with cancer", Clin Chem Lab Med, 55, pp.1891~1897 (2017)
- Selistre L, "Comparison of the Schwartz and CKD-EPI equations for estimating glomerular filtration rate in children, adolescents, and adults: a retrospective cross-sectional study", PLoS Med, 13, pp.e1001979~ (2016)[DOI]
- Pottel H, "An estimated glomerular filtration rate equation for the full age spectrum", Nephrol Dial Transplant, 31, pp.798~806 (2016)[DOI]
- Deng F, "Applicability of estimating glomerular filtration rate equations in pediatric patients: comparison with a measured glomerular filtration rate by iohexol clearance", Transl Res, 165, pp.437~445 (2015)[DOI]
- De Souza V, "Can the height-independent Pottel eGFR equation be used as a screening tool for chronic kidney disease in children", Eur J Pediatr, 174, pp.1225~1235 (2015)[DOI]
- Hoste L, "A new equation to estimate the glomerular filtration rate in children, adolescents and young adults", Nephrol Dial Transplant, 29, pp.1082~1091 (2014)[DOI]
- Staples A, "Validation of the revised Schwartz estimating equation in a predominantly non-CKD population", Pediatr Nephrol, 25, pp.2321~2326 (2010)[DOI]
- Schwartz GJ, "New equations to estimate GFR in children with CKD", J Am Soc Nephrol, 20, pp.629~637 (2009)[DOI]
- Blufpand HN, "Height-independent estimation of glomerular filtration rate in children: an alternative to the Schwartz equation", J Pediatr, 163, pp.1722~1727 (2013)[DOI]
- Lamb EJ, "Tietz textbook of clinical chemistry and molecular diagnostics", pp.669~707 (2012), Elsevier Health Sciences
- Colantonio DA, "Closing the gaps in pediatric laboratory reference intervals: a CALIPER database of 40 biochemical markers in a healthy and multiethnic population of children", Clin Chem, 58, pp.854~868 (2012)[DOI]
- Selistre L, "GFR estimation in adolescents and young adults", J Am Soc Nephrol, 23, pp.989~996 (2012)[DOI]
- De Souza VC, "Schwartz formula: is one k-coefficient adequate for all children", PLoS One, 7, pp.e53439~ (2012)[DOI]