일본어 동시통역에서의 비유창성 요소 분석: 휴지와 머뭇거림을 중심으로
Analysis of Factors of disfluency in Japanese Simultaneous Interpretation: Focused on Pause and Filler
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper examines occurrences of disfluency in simultaneous interpretation between Korean and Japanese; in particular, pauses and hesitation causing fillers and sound lengthening. The subject group consists of four experienced professional interpreters holding a master’s degree in translation from Hankuk University of Foreign Studies. In order to identify and analyze pauses and hesitation, they were asked to simultaneously interpret the speakers’ talk at actual international web seminars. It was found that the frequency and length of pauses were both found more in B-A simultaneous interpretation(Japanese to Korean) than in A-B interpretation(Korean to Japanese), though the difference varies from person and person. As for their hesitation, interestingly enough, the analysis exhibits that fillers were found more in A-B translation, whereas lengthening was more manifested in B-A interpretation. It was also found that the speakers’ pauses did not directly affect the interpreters’ pauses: it may be assumed that the interpreters were making an effort to balance the overall length of the source text by intentionally including pauses. As for the common fillers due to the interpreters’ hesitations, ‘え’, ‘あ’, ‘この’, ‘その’ and ‘だから’ appeared in A-B simultaneous interpretation, and ‘어’, ‘아’, ‘이제’ and ‘이런’ appeared in B-A interpretation. The number and location of lengthening differed depending on the interpreter, but the occurrence and location of lengthening were almost the same in simultaneous interpretation A-B and B-A.
Abstract
This paper examines occurrences of disfluency in simultaneous interpretation between Korean and Japanese; in particular, pauses and hesitation causing fillers and sound lengthening. The subject group consists of four experienced professional interpreters holding a master’s degree in translation from Hankuk University of Foreign Studies. In order to identify and analyze pauses and hesitation, they were asked to simultaneously interpret the speakers’ talk at actual international web seminars. It was found that the frequency and length of pauses were both found more in B-A simultaneous interpretation(Japanese to Korean) than in A-B interpretation(Korean to Japanese), though the difference varies from person and person. As for their hesitation, interestingly enough, the analysis exhibits that fillers were found more in A-B translation, whereas lengthening was more manifested in B-A interpretation. It was also found that the speakers’ pauses did not directly affect the interpreters’ pauses: it may be assumed that the interpreters were making an effort to balance the overall length of the source text by intentionally including pauses. As for the common fillers due to the interpreters’ hesitations, ‘え’, ‘あ’, ‘この’, ‘その’ and ‘だから’ appeared in A-B simultaneous interpretation, and ‘어’, ‘아’, ‘이제’ and ‘이런’ appeared in B-A interpretation. The number and location of lengthening differed depending on the interpreter, but the occurrence and location of lengthening were almost the same in simultaneous interpretation A-B and B-A.
참고문헌 (28)
- 김한식, "신문기사의 문장길이에 관한 한일 비교연구-독이성 제고를 위한 번역전략의 관점에서", 통번역학연구, 10(2), pp.69~83 (2007), 통번역연구소
- 남길임, "담화 유형에 따른 한국어 비유창성 현상 연구", 담화와 인지, 18(3), pp.115~138 (2011), 담화·인지언어학회[DOI]
- 박정윤, "한일 일한 동시통역에서의 시차의 고찰", 日本語文學, (22), pp.77~96 (2004), 한국일본어문학회
- 원종화, "영-한 동시통역 전략의 방향성 연구", 통역과 번역, 12(1), pp.131~155 (2010), 한국통역번역학회
- 이태형, "영한 동시통역의 문장 내 과도한 휴지 연구", 통역과 번역, 14(2), pp.197~214 (2012), 한국통역번역학회
- 이태형, "영한 동시통역 연구의 시간적 변수", 통역과 번역, 15(1), pp.125~144 (2013), 한국통역번역학회
- 장경희, "유아의 보조 용언 습득 경향에 관한 연구", 국제어문, (63), pp.283~314 (2014), 국제어문학회
- 최문선, "순차통역과 동시통역 학습자의 비유창성 양상 분석", 통역과 번역, 17(1), pp.177~207 (2015), 한국통역번역학회
- 최문선, "통역사 전문성에 따른 동시통역 비교: (비)유창성을 중심으로", 번역학연구, 19(5), pp.173~203 (2018), 한국번역학회[DOI]
- 하지완, "유창성장애 집단과 정상 집단의 간투사 비교연구", Communication Sciences and Disorders, 13(3), pp.438~453 (2008), 한국언어청각임상학회
- 笠浩一朗, "同時通訳者の話速に影響を及ぼす要因の定量的分析", 人工知能学会誌, 9, pp.21~32 (2009)
- Bartłomiejczyk, Magdalena, "Why Translation Studies Matters?", pp.183~194 (2010), John Benjamins
- Brennan, Susan E., "How Listeners Compensate for Disfluencies in Spontaneous Speech", Journal of Memory and Language, 44, pp.274~296 (2001)
- Cecot, Michela, "Pauses in Simultaneous Interpretation: A Contrastive Analysis of Professional Interpreters’ Performances", The Interpreters’ Newsletter, 11, pp.63~85 (2001)
- Čeňková, Ivana, "Mélanges de phonétique générale et expérimentale offerts à Péla Simon", pp.249~260 (1989), Publications de l’Institut de Phonétique de Strasbourg
- Clark, H Herbert, "Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking", Cognition, 84, pp.73~111 (2002)
- Martellini, Sara, "Prosody in simultaneous interpretation: A case study for the German-Italian language pair", The Interpreters’ Newsletter, 18, pp.61~79 (2013)
- Mead, Peter, "Methodological in the study of interpreters’ fluency", The Interpreters’ Newsletter, 13, pp.39~63 (2005)
- Shreve, Gregory M., "Methods and Strategies of Process Research", pp.93~120 (2011), John Benjamins
- Sylvi, Rennert, "The impact of fluency on the subjective assessment of interpreting quality", The Interpreters’ Newsletter, 15, pp.101~115 (2010)
- Tohyama, Hitomi, "Influence of Pause Length on Listeners’ Impressions in Simultaneous Interpretation", INTERSPEECH 2006 – ICSLP, pp.893~896 (2006)
- Wang, Binhua, "An Empirical Study of Pauses in Chinese-English Simultaneous Interpreting", Perspectives : Studies in Translatology, 23(1), pp.124~142 (2015)
- "국립국어원 우리말샘"[URL]
- "한국외국어대학교 통번역대학원 홈페이지"[URL]
- "한중일 3국 협력사무국 주최 한중일 스마트시티 웹세미나" (2021)[URL]
- "Audacity® 공식 홈페이지"[URL]
- "CacaoEncoder 공식 홈페이지"[URL]
- "Zoom Video Communications 공식 홈페이지"[URL]