Wear of primary teeth caused by opposed all-ceramic or stainless steel crowns
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of full-coverage all-ceramic zirconia, lithium disilicate glass-ceramic, leucite glass-ceramic, or stainless steel crowns on antagonistic primary tooth wear. MATERIALS AND METHODS. There were four study groups: the stainless steel (Steel) group, the leucite glassceramic (Leucite) group, the lithium disilicate glass-ceramic (Lithium) group, and the monolithic zirconia (Zirconia) group. Ten flat crown specimens were prepared per group; opposing teeth were prepared using primary canines. A wear test was conducted over 100,000 chewing cycles using a dual-axis chewing simulator and a 50 N masticating force, and wear losses of antagonistic teeth and restorative materials were calculated using a three-dimensional profiling system and an electronic scale, respectively. Statistical significance was determined using One-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (P<.05). RESULTS. The Leucite group (2.670±1.471 mm3) showed the greatest amount of antagonist tooth wear, followed by in decreasing order by the Lithium (2.042±0.696 mm3), Zirconia (1.426±0.477 mm3), and Steel groups (0.397±0.192 mm3). Mean volume losses in the Leucite and Lithium groups were significantly greater than in the Steel group (P<.05). No significant difference was observed between mean volume losses in the Zirconia and Steel groups (P>.05). CONCLUSION. Leucite glass-ceramic and lithium disilicate glass-ceramic cause more primary tooth wear than stainless steel or zirconia.
Abstract
PURPOSE. This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of full-coverage all-ceramic zirconia, lithium disilicate glass-ceramic, leucite glass-ceramic, or stainless steel crowns on antagonistic primary tooth wear. MATERIALS AND METHODS. There were four study groups: the stainless steel (Steel) group, the leucite glassceramic (Leucite) group, the lithium disilicate glass-ceramic (Lithium) group, and the monolithic zirconia (Zirconia) group. Ten flat crown specimens were prepared per group; opposing teeth were prepared using primary canines. A wear test was conducted over 100,000 chewing cycles using a dual-axis chewing simulator and a 50 N masticating force, and wear losses of antagonistic teeth and restorative materials were calculated using a three-dimensional profiling system and an electronic scale, respectively. Statistical significance was determined using One-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (P<.05). RESULTS. The Leucite group (2.670±1.471 mm3) showed the greatest amount of antagonist tooth wear, followed by in decreasing order by the Lithium (2.042±0.696 mm3), Zirconia (1.426±0.477 mm3), and Steel groups (0.397±0.192 mm3). Mean volume losses in the Leucite and Lithium groups were significantly greater than in the Steel group (P<.05). No significant difference was observed between mean volume losses in the Zirconia and Steel groups (P>.05). CONCLUSION. Leucite glass-ceramic and lithium disilicate glass-ceramic cause more primary tooth wear than stainless steel or zirconia.
참고문헌 (49)
- Humphery WP, "Uses of chrome steel in children’s dentistry", Dent Surv, 26, pp.945~949 (1950)
- Randall RC, "Preformed metal crowns for primary and permanent molar teeth: review of the literature", Pediatr Dent, 24, pp.489~500 (2002)
- MacLean JK, "Clinical outcomes for primary anterior teeth treated with preveneered stainless steel crowns", Pediatr Dent, 29, pp.377~381 (2007)
- Shah PV, "Clinical success and parental satisfaction with anterior preveneered primary stainless steel crowns", Pediatr Dent, 26, pp.391~395 (2004)
- Zimmerman JA, "Parental attitudes on restorative materials as factors influencing current use in pediatric dentistry", Pediatr Dent, 31, pp.63~70 (2009)
- Waggoner WF, "Restoring primary anterior teeth", Pediatr Dent, 24, pp.511~516 (2002)
- Waggoner WF, "Failure strength of four veneered primary stainless steel crowns", Pediatr Dent, 17, pp.36~40 (1995)
- Fuks AB, "Clinical performance of esthetic posterior crowns in primary molars: a pilot study", Pediatr Dent, 21, pp.445~448 (1999)
- Al-Amleh B, "Clinical trials in zirconia: a systematic review", J Oral Rehabil, 37, pp.641~652 (2010)
- Townsend JA, "In vitro fracture resistance of three commercially available zirconia crowns for primary molars", Pediatr Dent, 36, pp.125~129 (2014)
- Seligman DA, "The prevalence of dental attrition and its association with factors of age, gender, occlusion, and TMJ symptomatology", J Dent Res, 67, pp.1323~1333 (1988)
- Madléna M, "The attrition of deciduous teeth", Fogorv Sz, 82, pp.273~276 (1989)
- Mahoney E, "The hardness and modulus of elasticity of primary molar teeth: an ultramicro-indentation study", J Dent, 28, pp.589~594 (2000)
- Mair LH, "Wear: mechanisms, manifestations and measurement. Report of a workshop", J Dent, 24, pp.141~148 (1996)
- Proffit WR, "Occlusal forces in normal- and longface children", J Dent Res, 62, pp.571~574 (1983)
- Nose K, "Study on the hardness of human and animal teeth", Jap J Exp Med, 69, pp.1925~1945 (1961)
- Mortimer KV, "The relationship of deciduous enamel structure to dental disease", Caries Res, 4, pp.206~223 (1970)
- Nelson GV, "A three-year clinical evaluation of composite resin and a high copper amalgam in posterior primary teeth", ASDC J Dent Child, 47, pp.414~418 (1980)
- de Gee AJ, "Early and long-term wear of conventional and resin-modified glass ionomers", J Dent Res, 75, pp.1613~1619 (1996)
- Seghi RR, "Abrasion of human enamel by different dental ceramics in vitro", J Dent Res, 70, pp.221~225 (1991)
- Vann WF Jr, "Assessing composite resin wear in primary molars: four-year findings", J Dent Res, 67, pp.876~879 (1988)
- Villalta P, "In vitro occlusal wear of restorative materials on primary teeth", J Clin Pediatr Dent, 29, pp.221~224 (2005)
- da Cunha MR, "Correr-Sobrinho L. In vitro wear evaluation of dental materials in primary teeth", Am J Dent, 19, pp.364~369 (2006)
- 정유석, "A study on the in-vitro wear of the natural tooth structure by opposing zirconia or dental porcelain", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 2(3), pp.111~115 (2010), 대한치과보철학회
- Sripetchdanond J, "Wear of human enamel opposing monolithic zirconia, glass ceramic, and composite resin:an in vitro study", J Prosthet Dent, 112, pp.1141~1150 (2014)
- Ashima G, "Zirconia crowns for rehabilitation of decayed primary incisors: an esthetic alternative", J Clin Pediatr Dent, 39, pp.18~22 (2014)
- Planells del Pozo P, "Zirconia crowns--an esthetic and resistant restorative alternative for ECC affected primary teeth", J Clin Pediatr Dent, 38, pp.193~195 (2014)
- Al-Omiri MK, "Quantification of tooth wear: conventional vs new method using toolmakers microscope and a three-dimensional measuring technique", J Dent, 38, pp.560~568 (2010)
- Albashaireh ZS, "Two-body wear of different ceramic materials opposed to zirconia ceramic", J Prosthet Dent, 104, pp.105~113 (2010)
- Kim MJ, "Wear evaluation of the human enamel opposing different Y-TZP dental ceramics and other porcelains", J Dent, 40, pp.979~988 (2012)
- Amer R, "Three-body wear potential of dental yttrium-stabilized zirconia ceramic after grinding, polishing, and glazing treatments", J Prosthet Dent, 112, pp.1151~1155 (2014)
- Lambrechts P, "Quantitative in vivo wear of human enamel", J Dent Res, 68, pp.1752~1754 (1989)
- Suzuki S, "Simulated enamel wear during occlusal contact", Am J Dent, 17, pp.373~377 (2004)
- Heintze SD, "Wear of ten dental restorative materials in five wear simulators-results of a round robin test", Dent Mater, 21, pp.304~317 (2005)
- Yap AU, "Comparative wear ranking of dental restorative materials utilizing different wear simulation modes", J Oral Rehabil, 24, pp.574~580 (1997)
- Heintze SD, "Wear of ceramic and antagonist-a systematic evaluation of influencing factors in vitro", Dent Mater, 24, pp.433~449 (2008)
- Ghazal M, "Two-body wear of resin and ceramic denture teeth in comparison to human enamel", Dent Mater, 24, pp.502~507 (2008)
- Hahnel S, "Two-body wear of artificial acrylic and composite resin teeth in relation to antagonist material", J Prosthet Dent, 101, pp.269~278 (2009)
- Krejci I, "The influence of antagonist standardization on wear", J Dent Res, 78, pp.713~719 (1999)
- Kunzelmann KH, "Wear evaluation of MZ100 compared to ceramic CAD", CAM materials, 2001, pp.4, 171~184
- Magne P, "Wear of enamel and veneering ceramics after laboratory and chairside finishing procedures", J Prosthet Dent, 82, pp.669~679 (1999)
- DeLong R, "The wear of dental porcelain in an artificial mouth", Dent Mater, 2, pp.214~219 (1986)
- Vrijhoef MM, "A method to determine the loss of substance of dental restorations", J Oral Rehabil, 12, pp.9~16 (1985)
- Oh WS, "Factors affecting enamel and ceramic wear: a literature review", J Prosthet Dent, 87, pp.451~459 (2002)
- White SN, "Flexural strength of a layered zirconia and porcelain dental all-ceramic system", J Prosthet Dent, 94, pp.125~131 (2005)
- Ratledge DK, "The effect of restorative materials on the wear of human enamel", J Prosthet Dent, 72, pp.194~203 (1994)
- Conrad HJ, "Current ceramic materials and systems with clinical recommendations: a systematic review", J Prosthet Dent, 98, pp.389~404 (2007)
- Suzuki S, "Wear of enamel cusps opposed by posterior composite resin", Quintessence Int, 24, pp.885~890 (1993)
- Fischer TE, "Influence of fracture toughness on the wear resistance of yttria-doped zirconium oxide", J Am Ceram Soc, 72, pp.252~257 (1989)
