본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Comparison of implant component fractures in external and internal type: A 12-year retrospective study

2

조회

0

다운로드

12

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

PURPOSE. The aim of this study was to compare the fracture of implant component behavior of external and internal type of implants to suggest directions for successful implant treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Data were collected from the clinical records of all patients who received WARANTEC implants at Seoul National University Dental Hospital from February 2002 to January 2014 for 12 years. Total number of implants was 1,289 and an average of 3.2 implants was installed per patient. Information about abutment connection type, implant locations, platform sizes was collected with presence of implant component fractures and their managements. SPSS statistics software (version 24.0, IBM) was used for the statistical analysis. RESULTS. Overall fracture was significantly more frequent in internal type. The most frequently fractured component was abutment in internal type implants, and screw fracture occurred most frequently in external type. Analyzing by fractured components, screw fracture was the most frequent in the maxillary anterior region and the most abutment fracture occurred in the maxillary posterior region and screw fractures occurred more frequently in NP (narrow platform) and abutment fractures occurred more frequently in RP (regular platform). CONCLUSION. In external type, screw fracture occurred most frequently, especially in the maxillary anterior region, and in internal type, abutment fracture occurred frequently in the posterior region. placement of an external type implant rather thanan internal type is recommended for the posterior region where abutment fractures frequently occur.

Abstract

PURPOSE. The aim of this study was to compare the fracture of implant component behavior of external and internal type of implants to suggest directions for successful implant treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Data were collected from the clinical records of all patients who received WARANTEC implants at Seoul National University Dental Hospital from February 2002 to January 2014 for 12 years. Total number of implants was 1,289 and an average of 3.2 implants was installed per patient. Information about abutment connection type, implant locations, platform sizes was collected with presence of implant component fractures and their managements. SPSS statistics software (version 24.0, IBM) was used for the statistical analysis. RESULTS. Overall fracture was significantly more frequent in internal type. The most frequently fractured component was abutment in internal type implants, and screw fracture occurred most frequently in external type. Analyzing by fractured components, screw fracture was the most frequent in the maxillary anterior region and the most abutment fracture occurred in the maxillary posterior region and screw fractures occurred more frequently in NP (narrow platform) and abutment fractures occurred more frequently in RP (regular platform). CONCLUSION. In external type, screw fracture occurred most frequently, especially in the maxillary anterior region, and in internal type, abutment fracture occurred frequently in the posterior region. placement of an external type implant rather thanan internal type is recommended for the posterior region where abutment fractures frequently occur.

참고문헌 (18)

  1. Laney WR, "Osseointegrated implants for singletooth replacement: progress report from a multicenter prospective study after 3 years", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 9, pp.49~54 (1994)
  2. Wu PB, "Factors contributing to implant failure", Hong Kong Dent J, 2, pp.8~12 (2005)
  3. Carlson B, "Prosthodontic complications in osseointegrated dental implant treatment", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 9, pp.90~94 (1994)
  4. Bragger U, "Biological and technical complications and failures with fixed partial dentures (FPD) on implants and teeth after four to five years of function", Clin Oral Implants Res, 12, pp.26~34 (2001)[DOI]
  5. Luterbacher S, "Fractured prosthetic abutments in osseointegrated implants: a technical complication to cope with", Clin Oral Implants Res, 11, pp.163~170 (2000)[DOI]
  6. Binon PP, "Implants and components: entering the new millennium", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 15, pp.76~94 (2000)
  7. Adell R, "A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw", Int J Oral Surg, 10, pp.387~416 (1981)[DOI]
  8. Naert I, "A study of 589 consecutive implants supporting complete fixed prostheses. Part II: Prosthetic aspects", J Prosthet Dent, 68, pp.949~956 (1992)[DOI]
  9. Rangert B, "Bending overload and implant fracture: a retrospective clinical analysis", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 10, pp.326~334 (1995)
  10. Tolman DE, "Tissue-integrated prosthesis complications", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 7, pp.477~484 (1992)
  11. Sailer I, "Cemented and screw-retained implant reconstructions: a systematic review of the survival and complication rates", Clin Oral Implants Res, 23, pp.163~201 (2012)[DOI]
  12. Theoharidou A, "Abutment screw loosening in single-implant restorations: a systematic review", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 23, pp.681~690 (2008)
  13. Al Jabbari YS, "Mechanical behavior and failure analysis of prosthetic retaining screws after long-term use in vivo. Part 1: Characterization of adhesive wear and structure of retaining screws", J Prosthodont, 17, pp.168~180 (2008)[DOI]
  14. Al Jabbari Y, "Mechanical behavior and failure analysis of prosthetic retain-ing screws after long-term use in vivo. Part 2: Metallurgical and microhardness analysis", J Prosthodont, 17, pp.181~191 (2008)[DOI]
  15. Al Jabbari YS, "Mechanical behavior and failure analysis of prosthetic retaining screws after long-term use in vivo. Part 3: Preload and tensile fracture load testing", J Prosthodont, 17, pp.192~200 (2008)[DOI]
  16. Al Jabbari YS, "Mechanical behavior and failure analysis of prosthetic retaining screws after long-term use in vivo. Part 4: Failure analysis of 10 fractured retaining screws retrieved from three patients", J Prosthodont, 17, pp.201~210 (2008)[DOI]
  17. Rangert B, "Bending overload and implant fracture: a retrospective clinical analysis", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 10, pp.326~334 (1995)
  18. Morgan MJ, "Fractures of the fixture component of an osseointegrated implant", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 8, pp.409~414 (1993)

관련 논문AI추천

Complication incidence of two implant systems up to six years: a comparison between internal and external connection implants김수환, 김영성, 김원경, 이영규, 이용무, 채성욱대한치주과학회 · Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science2015 · 제45권 제1호Clinical and scanning electron microscopic analysis of fractured dental implants: a retrospective clinical analysis권경환, Eun-Ja Kim, Jae-Min Lee, Jae-Won Cha, Kyu-Bong Sim대한구강악안면외과학회 · 대한구강악안면외과학회지2012 · 제38권 제6호Clinical study on screw loosening in dental implant prostheses: a 6-year retrospective studyHye-Won Cho, Ji-Hye Jung, Ki-Young Lee, Kyung-Hwan Kwon, Kyung Su Shin, Yu-Lee Kim대한구강악안면외과학회 · 대한구강악안면외과학회지2020 · 제46권 제2호Implant Fracture After Screw Fracture in a Tissue-Level Implant: A Case Report위계희, 이보아대한구강악안면임플란트학회 · 대한구강악안면임플란트학회지2019 · 제23권 제4호Long-term cumulative survival and mechanical complications of singletooth Ankylos Implants: focus on the abutment neck fractures심혜원, 양병은대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2015 · 제7권 제6호Long-term effect of implant-abutment connection type on marginal bone loss and survival of dental implants김영민, 엄흥식, 이재관, 이종빈, 장범석대한치주과학회 · Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science2022 · 제52권 제6호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)