본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

In vitro comparison of the accuracy of an occlusal plane transfer method between facebow and POP bow systems in asymmetric ear position

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

PURPOSE. This in vitro study aimed to compare the accuracy of the conventional facebow system and the newly developed POP (PNUD (Pusan National University Dental School) Occlusal Plane) bow system for occlusal plane transfer in asymmetric ear position. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Two dentists participated in this study, one was categorized as Experimenter 1 and the other as Experimenter 2 based on their clinical experience with the facebow (1F, 2F) and POP bow (1P, 2P) systems. The vertical height difference between the two ears of the phantom model was set to 3 mm. Experimenter 1 and Experimenter 2 performed the facebow and POP bow systems on the phantom model 10 times each, and the transfer accuracy was analyzed. The accuracy was evaluated by measuring the angle between the reference virtual plane (RVP) of the phantom model and the experimental virtual plane (EVP) of the upper mounting plate through digital superimposition. All data were statistically analyzed using a paired t-test (P < .05). RESULTS. Regardless of clinical experience, the POP bow system (0.53° ± 0.30 (1P) and 0.19° ± 0.18 (2P) for Experimenter 1 and 2, respectively) was significantly more accurate than the facebow system (1.88° ± 0.50 (1F) and 1.34° ± 0.25 (2F), respectively) in the frontal view (P < .05). In the sagittal view, no significant differences were found between the POP bow system (0.92° ± 0.50 (1P) and 0.73° ± 0.42 (2P) for Experimenter 1 and 2, respectively) and the facebow system (0.82° ± 0.49 (1F) and 0.60° ± 0.39 (2F), respectively), regardless of clinical experience (P > .05). CONCLUSION. In cases of asymmetric ear position, the POP bow system may transfer occlusal plane information more accurately than the facebow system in the frontal view, regardless of clinical experience.

Abstract

PURPOSE. This in vitro study aimed to compare the accuracy of the conventional facebow system and the newly developed POP (PNUD (Pusan National University Dental School) Occlusal Plane) bow system for occlusal plane transfer in asymmetric ear position. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Two dentists participated in this study, one was categorized as Experimenter 1 and the other as Experimenter 2 based on their clinical experience with the facebow (1F, 2F) and POP bow (1P, 2P) systems. The vertical height difference between the two ears of the phantom model was set to 3 mm. Experimenter 1 and Experimenter 2 performed the facebow and POP bow systems on the phantom model 10 times each, and the transfer accuracy was analyzed. The accuracy was evaluated by measuring the angle between the reference virtual plane (RVP) of the phantom model and the experimental virtual plane (EVP) of the upper mounting plate through digital superimposition. All data were statistically analyzed using a paired t-test (P < .05). RESULTS. Regardless of clinical experience, the POP bow system (0.53° ± 0.30 (1P) and 0.19° ± 0.18 (2P) for Experimenter 1 and 2, respectively) was significantly more accurate than the facebow system (1.88° ± 0.50 (1F) and 1.34° ± 0.25 (2F), respectively) in the frontal view (P < .05). In the sagittal view, no significant differences were found between the POP bow system (0.92° ± 0.50 (1P) and 0.73° ± 0.42 (2P) for Experimenter 1 and 2, respectively) and the facebow system (0.82° ± 0.49 (1F) and 0.60° ± 0.39 (2F), respectively), regardless of clinical experience (P > .05). CONCLUSION. In cases of asymmetric ear position, the POP bow system may transfer occlusal plane information more accurately than the facebow system in the frontal view, regardless of clinical experience.

참고문헌 (26)

  1. Nagy WW, "Facebow use in clinical prosthodontic practice", J Prosthodont, 28, pp.772~774 (2019)
  2. Liya Ma, "A comparative study to measure the sagittal condylar inclination using mechanical articulator, virtual articulator and jaw tracking device", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 15(1), pp.11~21 (2023), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
  3. Palaskar JN, "Comparative evaluation of sagittal inclination of the occlusal plane with Frankfort horizontal plane in facebow transfers to semiadjustable and fully adjustable articulators", J Prosthet Dent, 123, pp.299~304 (2020)
  4. Maveli TC, "In vitro comparison of the maxillary occlusal plane orientation obtained with five facebow systems", J Prosthet Dent, 114, pp.566~573 (2015)
  5. Afsharzand Z, "Communication between the dental laboratory technician and dentist : work authorization for fixed partial dentures", J Prosthodont, 15, pp.123~128 (2006)
  6. Weston JF, "Creating aesthetic success through proper clinician and laboratory technical communication", Dent Clin North Am, 55, pp.371~382 (2011)
  7. Samet N, "A clinical and cost-benefit evaluation of five facebows", Quintessence Int, 33, pp.511~515 (2002)
  8. Palik JF, "Accuracy of an earpiece face-bow", J Prosthet Dent, 53, pp.800~804 (1985)
  9. Japatti SR, "Anthropometric assessment of the normal adult human ear", Ann Maxillofac Surg, 8, pp.42~50 (2018)
  10. Leukhardt M, "Transferring esthetically relevant facial reference lines to the articulator", J Craniomandib Func, 2, pp.311~328 (2010)
  11. 이설화, "조립식 교합 평면 인기 장치 POP (PNUD Occlusal Plane) Bow 시스템을 이용한 3D 프린팅 CAD-CAM 의치치료 증례", 대한치과보철학회지, 61(1), pp.44~54 (2023), 대한치과보철학회
  12. 박도현, "상하악 전악 발거 환자에서 POP BOW 시스템의 교합평면 디지털 전이법을 이용한 3D 프린팅 임시 즉시의치의 수복 증례", 구강회복응용과학지, 38(3), pp.178~188 (2022), 대한턱관절교합학회
  13. 탁상명, "악교정수술 병력을 가진 과도한 치아 마모를 보이는 환자의 수직고경 증가를 동반한 전악 수복 증례", 대한치과보철학회지, 61(1), pp.33~43 (2023), 대한치과보철학회
  14. 이자영, "Full Mouth Rehabilitation of an Edentulous Patient with Fixed Full-arch Implant-supported Prostheses: A Case Report", 대한구강악안면임플란트학회지, 26(4), pp.234~242 (2022), 대한구강악안면임플란트학회
  15. 정윤수, "상악 부분 무치악 환자에서 Milled-bar와 어태치먼트를 이용한 임플란트 부분 피개의치 수복 증례 보고", 대한치과보철학회지, 60(4), pp.412~419 (2022), 대한치과보철학회
  16. "The Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms: Ninth edition", J Prosthet Dent, 117, pp.e1~105 (2017)
  17. Al Quran FA, "The position of the occlusal plane in natural and artificial dentitions as related to other craniofacial planes", J Prosthodont, 19, pp.601~605 (2010)
  18. Saurabh Chaturvedi, "Cephalometrically assessing the validity of superior, middle and inferior tragus points on ala - tragus line while establishing the occlusal plane in edentulous patient", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 5(1), pp.58~66 (2013), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
  19. Shaikh SA, "Relationship between occlusal plane and three levels of ala tragus line in dentulous and partially dentulous patients in different age groups : a pilot study", J Clin Diagn Res, 9, pp.ZC39~42 (2015)
  20. Hatzi P, "Determining the accuracy of articulator interchangeability and hinge axis reproducibility", J Prosthet Dent, 85, pp.236~245 (2001)
  21. Maveli TC, "In vitro comparison of the maxillary occlusal plane orientation obtained with five facebow systems", J Prosthet Dent, 114, pp.566~573 (2015)
  22. Bamber MA, "A comparative study of two arbitrary face-bow transfer systems for orthognathic surgery planning", Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 25, pp.339~343 (1996)
  23. Preston JD, "A reassessment of the mandibular transverse horizontal axis theory", J Prosthet Dent, 41, pp.605~613 (1979)
  24. Morneburg TR, "Impact of arbitrary and mean transfer of dental casts to the articulator on centric occlusal errors", Clin Oral Investig, 15, pp.427~434 (2011)
  25. Ahlers MO, "Reproduction accuracy of articulator mounting with an arbitrary facebow vs. average values-a controlled, randomized, blinded patient simulator study", Clin Oral Investig, 23, pp.1007~1014 (2019)
  26. Farias-Neto A, "Face-bow transfer in prosthodontics : a systematic review of the literature", J Oral Rehabil, 40, pp.686~692 (2013)

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)