본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The 2016 WHO versus 2008 WHO Criteria for the Diagnosis of Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류병리학

초록

The 2016 WHO diagnostic criteria for chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) require both absolute and relative monocytosis (≥1×109/L and ≥10% of white blood cell counts) in peripheral blood. Moreover, myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) features in bone marrow and/or MPN-associated mutations tend to support MPN with monocytosis rather than CMML. We assessed the impact of the 2016 WHO criteria on CMML diagnosis, compared with the 2008 WHO criteria, through a retrospective review of the medical records of 38 CMML patients diagnosed according to the 2008 WHO classification. Application of the 2016 WHO criteria resulted in the exclusion of three (8%) patients who did not fulfill the relative monocytosis criterion and eight (21%) patients with an MPN-associated mutation. These 11 patients formed the 2016 WHO others group; the remaining 27 formed the 2016 WHO CMML group. The significant difference in the platelet count and monocyte percentage between the two groups indicated that the 2016 WHO criteria lead to a more homogenous and improved definition of CMML compared with the 2008 WHO criteria, which may have led to over-diagnosis of CMML. More widespread use of molecular tests and more sophisticated clinical and morphological evaluations are necessary to diagnose CMML accurately.

Abstract

The 2016 WHO diagnostic criteria for chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) require both absolute and relative monocytosis (≥1×109/L and ≥10% of white blood cell counts) in peripheral blood. Moreover, myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) features in bone marrow and/or MPN-associated mutations tend to support MPN with monocytosis rather than CMML. We assessed the impact of the 2016 WHO criteria on CMML diagnosis, compared with the 2008 WHO criteria, through a retrospective review of the medical records of 38 CMML patients diagnosed according to the 2008 WHO classification. Application of the 2016 WHO criteria resulted in the exclusion of three (8%) patients who did not fulfill the relative monocytosis criterion and eight (21%) patients with an MPN-associated mutation. These 11 patients formed the 2016 WHO others group; the remaining 27 formed the 2016 WHO CMML group. The significant difference in the platelet count and monocyte percentage between the two groups indicated that the 2016 WHO criteria lead to a more homogenous and improved definition of CMML compared with the 2008 WHO criteria, which may have led to over-diagnosis of CMML. More widespread use of molecular tests and more sophisticated clinical and morphological evaluations are necessary to diagnose CMML accurately.

참고문헌 (10)

  1. Itzykson R, "CMML: clinical and molecular aspects", Int J Hematol, 105, pp.711~719 (2017)[DOI]
  2. Santini V, "A phase II, multicenter trial of decitabine in higher-risk chronic myelomonocytic leukemia", Leukemia, 32, pp.413~418 (2018)[DOI]
  3. Arber DA, "The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia", Blood, 127, pp.2391~2405 (2016)[DOI]
  4. Orazi A, "WHO classification of tumours of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues", pp.82~86 (2017), International Agency for Research on Cancer
  5. Orazi A, "WHO classification of tumours of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues", pp.76~79 (2008), International Agency for Research on Cancer
  6. Schuler E, "Refined medullary blast and white blood cell count based classification of chronic myelomonocytic leukemias", Leuk Res, 38, pp.1413~1419 (2014)[DOI]
  7. Patnaik MM, "Cytogenetic and molecular abnormalities in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia", Blood Cancer J, 6, pp.e393~ (2016)[DOI]
  8. Elena C, "Integrating clinical features and genetic lesions in the risk assessment of patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia", Blood, 128, pp.1408~1417 (2016)[DOI]
  9. Reinig E, "Targeted next-generation sequencing in myelodysplastic syndrome and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia aids diagnosis in challenging cases and identifies frequent spliceosome mutations in transformed acute myeloid leukemia", Am J Clin Pathol, 145, pp.497~506 (2016)[DOI]
  10. Selimoglu-Buet D, "Characteristic repartition of monocyte subsets as a diagnostic signature of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia", Blood, 125, pp.3618~3626 (2015)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

Poor Prognostic Implication of ASXL1 Mutations in Korean Patients With Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia김선희, 김현영, 김희진, 이기오, 장준호, 정철원, 박실비아대한진단검사의학회 · Annals of Laboratory Medicine2018 · 제38권 제6호Reclassification of Acute Myeloid Leukemia According to the 2016 WHO Classification정진, 조빈, 김명신, 김용구, 김희제, 이재욱, 장우리, 정낙균, 조병식, 한경자, 한은희대한진단검사의학회 · Annals of Laboratory Medicine2019 · 제39권 제3호Revised World Health Organization Criteria-Defined Acute Myeloid Leukemia in a Large Cohort: Highlighting the Frequency and Characterization of Recategorized Cases김시환, 박찬정, 서을주, 이민영, 장성수, 조영욱, 황상현대한진단검사의학회 · Laboratory Medicine Online2021 · 제11권 제2호골수증식 종양의 2017년 WHO 진단기준 주요 변경 사항의 이해장미애대한내과학회 · 대한내과학회지2018 · 제93권 제4호A Case of Patient with Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia Presenting as Hypereosinophilia문희범, Jin Wook Park, Soo Young Na, Tae-Bum Kim, Tai Sun Park, Yi Rang Kim, You Sook Cho, Yun-Jeong Bae대한천식알레르기학회 · 천식 및 알레르기2010 · 제30권 제3호Straightforward Identification of Masked Polycythemia Vera Based on Proposed Revision of World Health Organization Diagnostic Criteria for BCR-ABL1-Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms박찬정, 서을주, 장성수, 조영욱, 주대현대한진단검사의학회 · Annals of Laboratory Medicine2015 · 제35권 제6호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (17건)