The Implementation and Effects of a Clinical Laboratory Accreditation Program in Korea from 1999 to 2006
1
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background : The Korean Laboratory Accreditation Program (KLAP) by the Korean Society of Laboratory Medicine (KSLM) was started in 1999. We summarized history and achievement of KLAP for the last 8 yr. Methods : We analyzed 8 yr data (1999-2006) of historical events, trends of participating laboratories, and scores according to the impact of the question to the outcome of the tests. Inspection check lists are for ‘laboratory management’, ‘clinical chemistry’, ‘diagnostic hematology’, ‘clinical microbiology’, ‘diagnostic immunology’, ‘transfusion medicine’, ‘cytogenetics’, ‘molecular genetics’, ‘histocompatibility’, ‘flow cytometry’, and ‘comprehensive laboratory test verification report’. The laboratories with score 90 or higher got 2-yr certificate and laboratories with score between 60 and 89 got 1-yr certificate. The laboratories with score below 60 failed accreditation. Results : The number of accredited laboratories was 2.4 times higher in 2006 (n=227) than in 1999 (n=96). Inspection check lists have been revised 5 times till 2006. The average accreditation rate was 99.6% during these periods and the 2-yr accreditation rate was 32.4% in 2000, 45.6% in 2001, 53.3% in 2002, 47.3% in 2003, 68.5% in 2004, 37.7% in 2005, and 47.7% in 2006. Number of participants in inspector training workshops increased from 89 in 2000 to 766 in 2006. Conclusions : The KLAP has been in place successfully and stabilized over the past 8 yr. It seemed to enhance the laboratory quality. Efforts for improvement of quality control and inspector training workshops appeared to be in the main contributing factors.
Abstract
Background : The Korean Laboratory Accreditation Program (KLAP) by the Korean Society of Laboratory Medicine (KSLM) was started in 1999. We summarized history and achievement of KLAP for the last 8 yr. Methods : We analyzed 8 yr data (1999-2006) of historical events, trends of participating laboratories, and scores according to the impact of the question to the outcome of the tests. Inspection check lists are for ‘laboratory management’, ‘clinical chemistry’, ‘diagnostic hematology’, ‘clinical microbiology’, ‘diagnostic immunology’, ‘transfusion medicine’, ‘cytogenetics’, ‘molecular genetics’, ‘histocompatibility’, ‘flow cytometry’, and ‘comprehensive laboratory test verification report’. The laboratories with score 90 or higher got 2-yr certificate and laboratories with score between 60 and 89 got 1-yr certificate. The laboratories with score below 60 failed accreditation. Results : The number of accredited laboratories was 2.4 times higher in 2006 (n=227) than in 1999 (n=96). Inspection check lists have been revised 5 times till 2006. The average accreditation rate was 99.6% during these periods and the 2-yr accreditation rate was 32.4% in 2000, 45.6% in 2001, 53.3% in 2002, 47.3% in 2003, 68.5% in 2004, 37.7% in 2005, and 47.7% in 2006. Number of participants in inspector training workshops increased from 89 in 2000 to 766 in 2006. Conclusions : The KLAP has been in place successfully and stabilized over the past 8 yr. It seemed to enhance the laboratory quality. Efforts for improvement of quality control and inspector training workshops appeared to be in the main contributing factors.
참고문헌 (10)
- 이위교, "임상검사실표준화심사및신임인증제도에 관한 연구 I: 개발 및 시행에 관한 연구", 대한임상병리학회지, 21, pp.86~92 (2001)
- 이위교, "임상검사실 표준화 심사 및 신임 인증제도에 관한 연구 Ⅱ: 1차년도 인증심사 분석", The Korean Journal of Laboratory Medicine, 23(5), pp.363~369 (2003), 대한진단검사의학회
- "보건복지부 고시 제1999-32호 중 제2부 진료수가 기준액표 및 산정지침 중 제1절 주:2.4., 1998.11.15 의료보험진료수가 및 약제비 산정기준 092.2-413, 1999.5.27 검체 검사 수탁인증제도 시행에 따른 업무안내등협조요청", ~
- "보건복지부 고시 제1999-32호중제2부진료수가기준액표및산정지침중제1절코드", ~
- 곽연식, "외국 진단검사의학의 현황과 진단검사의학의국제적표준화", 대한진단검사의학회지, 26, pp.S47~S53 (2006)
- 송경은, "대한진단검사의학회지", 26, pp.S76~S77 (2006)
- 신보문, "인증심사의홍보및활용", 대한진단검사의학회지, 26, pp.S16~S17 (2006)
- 채석래, "대한진단검사의학회 인증심사 발전방향", 대한진단검사의학회지, 26, pp.S78~S81 (2006)
- 신보문, "유전자 검사의 질관리", 대한의사협회지, 49, pp.583~588 (2006)
- 채석래, "건강검진에서 진단의학검사 질관리의 중요성", 대한진단검사의학회지, 27, pp.S47~S52 (2007)
