본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Implementation and Effects of a Clinical Laboratory Accreditation Program in Korea from 1999 to 2006

1

조회

0

다운로드

9

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류병리학

초록

Background : The Korean Laboratory Accreditation Program (KLAP) by the Korean Society of Laboratory Medicine (KSLM) was started in 1999. We summarized history and achievement of KLAP for the last 8 yr. Methods : We analyzed 8 yr data (1999-2006) of historical events, trends of participating laboratories, and scores according to the impact of the question to the outcome of the tests. Inspection check lists are for ‘laboratory management’, ‘clinical chemistry’, ‘diagnostic hematology’, ‘clinical microbiology’, ‘diagnostic immunology’, ‘transfusion medicine’, ‘cytogenetics’, ‘molecular genetics’, ‘histocompatibility’, ‘flow cytometry’, and ‘comprehensive laboratory test verification report’. The laboratories with score 90 or higher got 2-yr certificate and laboratories with score between 60 and 89 got 1-yr certificate. The laboratories with score below 60 failed accreditation. Results : The number of accredited laboratories was 2.4 times higher in 2006 (n=227) than in 1999 (n=96). Inspection check lists have been revised 5 times till 2006. The average accreditation rate was 99.6% during these periods and the 2-yr accreditation rate was 32.4% in 2000, 45.6% in 2001, 53.3% in 2002, 47.3% in 2003, 68.5% in 2004, 37.7% in 2005, and 47.7% in 2006. Number of participants in inspector training workshops increased from 89 in 2000 to 766 in 2006. Conclusions : The KLAP has been in place successfully and stabilized over the past 8 yr. It seemed to enhance the laboratory quality. Efforts for improvement of quality control and inspector training workshops appeared to be in the main contributing factors.

Abstract

Background : The Korean Laboratory Accreditation Program (KLAP) by the Korean Society of Laboratory Medicine (KSLM) was started in 1999. We summarized history and achievement of KLAP for the last 8 yr. Methods : We analyzed 8 yr data (1999-2006) of historical events, trends of participating laboratories, and scores according to the impact of the question to the outcome of the tests. Inspection check lists are for ‘laboratory management’, ‘clinical chemistry’, ‘diagnostic hematology’, ‘clinical microbiology’, ‘diagnostic immunology’, ‘transfusion medicine’, ‘cytogenetics’, ‘molecular genetics’, ‘histocompatibility’, ‘flow cytometry’, and ‘comprehensive laboratory test verification report’. The laboratories with score 90 or higher got 2-yr certificate and laboratories with score between 60 and 89 got 1-yr certificate. The laboratories with score below 60 failed accreditation. Results : The number of accredited laboratories was 2.4 times higher in 2006 (n=227) than in 1999 (n=96). Inspection check lists have been revised 5 times till 2006. The average accreditation rate was 99.6% during these periods and the 2-yr accreditation rate was 32.4% in 2000, 45.6% in 2001, 53.3% in 2002, 47.3% in 2003, 68.5% in 2004, 37.7% in 2005, and 47.7% in 2006. Number of participants in inspector training workshops increased from 89 in 2000 to 766 in 2006. Conclusions : The KLAP has been in place successfully and stabilized over the past 8 yr. It seemed to enhance the laboratory quality. Efforts for improvement of quality control and inspector training workshops appeared to be in the main contributing factors.

참고문헌 (10)

  1. 이위교, "임상검사실표준화심사및신임인증제도에 관한 연구 I: 개발 및 시행에 관한 연구", 대한임상병리학회지, 21, pp.86~92 (2001)
  2. 이위교, "임상검사실 표준화 심사 및 신임 인증제도에 관한 연구 Ⅱ: 1차년도 인증심사 분석", The Korean Journal of Laboratory Medicine, 23(5), pp.363~369 (2003), 대한진단검사의학회
  3. "보건복지부 고시 제1999-32호 중 제2부 진료수가 기준액표 및 산정지침 중 제1절 주:2.4., 1998.11.15 의료보험진료수가 및 약제비 산정기준 092.2-413, 1999.5.27 검체 검사 수탁인증제도 시행에 따른 업무안내등협조요청", ~
  4. "보건복지부 고시 제1999-32호중제2부진료수가기준액표및산정지침중제1절코드", ~
  5. 곽연식, "외국 진단검사의학의 현황과 진단검사의학의국제적표준화", 대한진단검사의학회지, 26, pp.S47~S53 (2006)
  6. 송경은, "대한진단검사의학회지", 26, pp.S76~S77 (2006)
  7. 신보문, "인증심사의홍보및활용", 대한진단검사의학회지, 26, pp.S16~S17 (2006)
  8. 채석래, "대한진단검사의학회 인증심사 발전방향", 대한진단검사의학회지, 26, pp.S78~S81 (2006)
  9. 신보문, "유전자 검사의 질관리", 대한의사협회지, 49, pp.583~588 (2006)
  10. 채석래, "건강검진에서 진단의학검사 질관리의 중요성", 대한진단검사의학회지, 27, pp.S47~S52 (2007)

관련 논문AI추천

Effect of Accreditation on Accuracy of Diagnostic Tests in Medical Laboratories김정호, 민원기, 송정한, 윤영안, 이용화, 이유경, 이지성, 장미애대한진단검사의학회 · Annals of Laboratory Medicine2017 · 제37권 제3호우리나라 우수검사실 신임인증의 검사실운영 품질기준: 세계보건기구 필수품질체계에 대한 순응 정도와 차이김솔잎, 윤치호, 이유경, 장미애, 전병열, 조성란대한진단검사의학회 · Laboratory Medicine Online2020 · 제10권 제2호Schemes and Performance Evaluation Criteria of Korean Association of External Quality Assessment (KEQAS) for Improving Laboratory TestingChun Sail, Kim Sollip, Lee Kyunghoon, Lee Yong-Wha, Min Won-Ki, Park Hyung-Doo대한진단검사의학회 · Annals of Laboratory Medicine2021 · 제41권 제2호Effect of Accreditation on the Accuracy of Diagnostic Hematologic Tests: Standard Deviation Index Analysis권계철, 민원기, 윤영안, 이용화, 이유경, 이지성, 장미애대한진단검사의학회 · Annals of Laboratory Medicine2018 · 제38권 제1호국내 임상검사실의 검사법 평가절차 현황 고찰Cho Jooyoung, Kim Juwon, Rim John Hoon대한진단검사의학회 · Laboratory Medicine Online2024 · 제14권 제3호Development of a Document Management System for the Standardization of Clinical Laboratory Documents강수진, 이도훈, 정선경, 정승현, 차효성, 황상현대한진단검사의학회 · Annals of Laboratory Medicine2013 · 제33권 제6호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)