본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Automatic Derivation of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Settings: Comparison with In-Laboratory Titration

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Background and Purpose This study was designed to investigate differences in the final recommended pressure setting between that derived from an autotitrating continuous positive airway pressure (APAP) device and manual in-laboratory continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) titration, as well as the factors that influence pressure differences in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Methods This study enrolled 50 patients with OSA. All patients underwent both APAP titration and manual CPAP titration. We obtained the average device pressure ≤90% of the time (APAP90) from the downloaded manual for the APAP machine and the optimal pressure obtained by manual CPAP titration (CPAPmanual). We placed the subjects into three groups based on the pressure difference (ΔP) obtained by subtracting CPAPmanual from APAP90: 1) Prequal (ΔP=0), 2) CPAPmanual+ (ΔP ≤-1), and 3) APAP90+ (ΔP ≥1). Regression analysis was conducted to identify predictive factors associated with ΔP. Results The values of APAP90 and CPAPmanual were 9.50±3.03 cmH2O and 9.48±2.71 cmH2O (mean±SD), respectively (p=0.95). The Prequal, CPAPmanual+, and APAP90+ groups comprised 9 (18%), 23 (46%), and 18 (36%) subjects, respectively. Regression analyses revealed that male sex [β=3.539, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.040–7.039], body mass index (BMI) (β=0.186, 95% CI=0.020–0.352), and average usage per day (β=0.768, 95% CI=0.077–1.459) were associated with ΔP. Conclusions While the mean pressure in the overall cohort did not differ significantly between APAP90 and CPAPmanual, there was a discordance majority showing different single pressures obtained when applying the two titration methods. Being Male, having an increased BMI, and having an increased average usage per day of APAP were significantly correlated with increased ΔP in this study.

Abstract

Background and Purpose This study was designed to investigate differences in the final recommended pressure setting between that derived from an autotitrating continuous positive airway pressure (APAP) device and manual in-laboratory continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) titration, as well as the factors that influence pressure differences in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Methods This study enrolled 50 patients with OSA. All patients underwent both APAP titration and manual CPAP titration. We obtained the average device pressure ≤90% of the time (APAP90) from the downloaded manual for the APAP machine and the optimal pressure obtained by manual CPAP titration (CPAPmanual). We placed the subjects into three groups based on the pressure difference (ΔP) obtained by subtracting CPAPmanual from APAP90: 1) Prequal (ΔP=0), 2) CPAPmanual+ (ΔP ≤-1), and 3) APAP90+ (ΔP ≥1). Regression analysis was conducted to identify predictive factors associated with ΔP. Results The values of APAP90 and CPAPmanual were 9.50±3.03 cmH2O and 9.48±2.71 cmH2O (mean±SD), respectively (p=0.95). The Prequal, CPAPmanual+, and APAP90+ groups comprised 9 (18%), 23 (46%), and 18 (36%) subjects, respectively. Regression analyses revealed that male sex [β=3.539, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.040–7.039], body mass index (BMI) (β=0.186, 95% CI=0.020–0.352), and average usage per day (β=0.768, 95% CI=0.077–1.459) were associated with ΔP. Conclusions While the mean pressure in the overall cohort did not differ significantly between APAP90 and CPAPmanual, there was a discordance majority showing different single pressures obtained when applying the two titration methods. Being Male, having an increased BMI, and having an increased average usage per day of APAP were significantly correlated with increased ΔP in this study.

참고문헌 (18)

  1. Kushida CA, "Clinical guidelines for the manual titration of positive airway pressure in patients with obstructive sleep apnea", J Clin Sleep Med, 4, pp.157~171 (2008)
  2. Rosen CL, "A multisite randomized trial of portable sleep studies and positive airway pressure autotitration versus laboratory-based polysomnography for the diagnosis and treatment of obstructive sleep apnea:the HomePAP study", Sleep, 35, pp.757~767 (2012)
  3. Cho YW, "The reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Epworth sleepiness scale", Sleep Breath, 15, pp.377~384 (2011)
  4. Sohn SI, "The reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index", Sleep Breath, 16, pp.803~812 (2012)
  5. 조용원, "Validation of a Korean Version of the Insomnia Severity Index", Journal of Clinical Neurology, 10(3), pp.210~215 (2014), 대한신경과학회[DOI]
  6. Berry RB, "Rules for scoring respiratory events in sleep: update of the 2007 AASM Manual for the Scoring of Sleep and Associated Events. Deliberations of the Sleep Apnea Definitions Task Force of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine", J Clin Sleep Med, 8, pp.597~619 (2012)
  7. Wimms AJ, "Assessment of the impact on compliance of a new CPAP system in obstructive sleep apnea", Sleep Breath, 17, pp.69~76 (2013)
  8. Masa JF, "Alternative methods of titrating continuous positive airway pressure : a large multicenter study", Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 170, pp.1218~1224 (2004)
  9. Berry RB, "Auto-adjusting positive airway pressure treatment for sleep apnea diagnosed by home sleep testing", J Clin Sleep Med, 10, pp.1269~1275 (2014)
  10. Saha S, "Effects of changing in the neck circumference during sleep on snoring sound characteristics", Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, 2015, pp.2235~2238 (2015)
  11. Kurtoglu S, "Neck circumference as a novel parameter to determine metabolic risk factors in obese children", Eur J Clin Invest, 42, pp.623~630 (2012)
  12. Onat A, "Neck circumference as a measure of central obesity: associations with metabolic syndrome and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome beyond waist circumference", Clin Nutr, 28, pp.46~51 (2009)
  13. Fischer MK, "Immediate and overnight recumbence-dependent changes of neck circumference : relationship with OSA severity in obese and nonobese subjects", Sleep Med, 13, pp.650~655 (2012)
  14. Mokros Ł, "High negative predictive value of normal body mass index for obstructive sleep apnea in the lateral sleeping position", J Clin Sleep Med, 14, pp.985~990 (2018)
  15. Lebret M, "Factors contributing to unintentional leak during CPAP treatment : a systematic review", Chest, 151, pp.707~719 (2017)
  16. Malhotra RK, "Polysomnography for obstructive sleep apnea should include arousal-based scoring: an American Academy of Sleep Medicine Position Statement", J Clin Sleep Med, 14, pp.1245~1247 (2018)
  17. Garbarino S, "Obstructive sleep apnea with or without excessive daytime sleepiness : clinical and experimental data-driven phenotyping", Front Neurol, 9, pp.505~ (2018)
  18. Dancey DR, "Gender differences in sleep apnea : the role of neck circumference", Chest, 123, pp.1544~1550 (2003)

관련 논문AI추천

한국인 폐쇄성 수면 무호흡 환자의 적정 양압을 위한 수동화 양압측정법과 자동화 양압 측정법의 비교김대진, 김현우, 문수진, 이민우, 조재욱, 최병걸대한임상검사과학회 · 대한임상검사과학회지2019 · 제51권 제2호중증 폐쇄성 수면무호흡증에서 자동형 양압기와 고정형 양압기 치료의 비교 분석김성동, 김화빈, 문수진, 이근익, 조규섭, 조일녕대한이비인후과학회 · 대한이비인후과학회지 두경부외과학2020 · 제63권 제3호Effective Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Changes Related to Sleep Stage and Body Position in Obstructive Sleep Apnea during Upward and Downward Titration: An Experimental Study남정권, 박올림, 이은미, 이태훈대한신경과학회 · Journal of Clinical Neurology2020 · 제16권 제1호Optimal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Level in Korean Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome신철, 최준, 권순영, 김강우, 김은중, 김태훈, 이상학, 이승훈, 이흥만, 최지호대한이비인후과학회 · Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology2010 · 제3권 제4호Compliance with Positive Airway Pressure Treatment for Obstructive Sleep Apnea권민수, 김지희, 송형민, 이봉재, 장용주, 정유삼대한이비인후과학회 · Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology2009 · 제2권 제2호Adherence to Positive Airway Pressure therapy as Severity of Adult Obstructive Sleep Apnea유준, 박성민, 서민영, 이민규, 이승훈, 한문수, 황선진대한이비인후과학회 · 대한이비인후과학회지 두경부외과학2022 · 제65권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (27건)