Effect of Two Cystatin C Reagents and Four Equations on Glomerular Filtration Rate Estimations After Standardization
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background: Serum cystatin C (cysC), which is less affected by sex, race, and muscle mass than creatinine, is a useful biomarker of the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). The standardization of cysC measurements remains controversial, although a certified reference material (ERM-DA471/IFCC) is available. Moreover, the effect of combinations of cysC reagents and equations for eGFR is unclear. Methods: We conducted a simulation analysis of cysC measured using two reagents standardized against ERM-DA471/IFCC—Gentian cystatin C immunoassay (Gentiancys; GentianAS, Moss, Norway) and Roche Tina-quant Cystatin C Gen.2 (Rochecys; Roche, Mannheim, Germany)—on a Cobas c702 system (Roche) and eGFR generated by eight combinations of four equations: 2012 cystatin C-based Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPIcys); the Caucasian, Asian, pediatric, and adult equation (CAPAeq); full age spectrum equation (FASeq); and 2023 cystatin C-based European Kidney Function Consortium equation (EKFCcys). Results: A total of 148 participants (mean age, 60.5±14.5 years; 43% female) were enrolled. The mean cysC was 1.72±1.44 mg/L for Gentiancys and 1.71±1.35 mg/L for Rochecys. Regression analysis showed concordance between the reagents within 0.85–4.40 mg/L when using ±7.61% total allowable error. Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient of eGFR, by combining the measuring system and equation, varied from 0.73 to 1.00. Conclusions: The equivalence of cysC values at low concentrations (<0.85 mg/L) between the two reagents was unsatisfactory. Results obtained with different measurement systems could lead to larger differences in eGFR varying with the combination.
Abstract
Background: Serum cystatin C (cysC), which is less affected by sex, race, and muscle mass than creatinine, is a useful biomarker of the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). The standardization of cysC measurements remains controversial, although a certified reference material (ERM-DA471/IFCC) is available. Moreover, the effect of combinations of cysC reagents and equations for eGFR is unclear. Methods: We conducted a simulation analysis of cysC measured using two reagents standardized against ERM-DA471/IFCC—Gentian cystatin C immunoassay (Gentiancys; GentianAS, Moss, Norway) and Roche Tina-quant Cystatin C Gen.2 (Rochecys; Roche, Mannheim, Germany)—on a Cobas c702 system (Roche) and eGFR generated by eight combinations of four equations: 2012 cystatin C-based Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPIcys); the Caucasian, Asian, pediatric, and adult equation (CAPAeq); full age spectrum equation (FASeq); and 2023 cystatin C-based European Kidney Function Consortium equation (EKFCcys). Results: A total of 148 participants (mean age, 60.5±14.5 years; 43% female) were enrolled. The mean cysC was 1.72±1.44 mg/L for Gentiancys and 1.71±1.35 mg/L for Rochecys. Regression analysis showed concordance between the reagents within 0.85–4.40 mg/L when using ±7.61% total allowable error. Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient of eGFR, by combining the measuring system and equation, varied from 0.73 to 1.00. Conclusions: The equivalence of cysC values at low concentrations (<0.85 mg/L) between the two reagents was unsatisfactory. Results obtained with different measurement systems could lead to larger differences in eGFR varying with the combination.
참고문헌 (39)
- Grubb A, "Human gamma-trace, a basic microprotein: amino acid sequence and presence in the adenohypophysis", Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 79, pp.3024~3027 (1982)
- Grubb A, "Diagnostic value of analysis of cystatin C and protein HC in biological fluids", Clin Nephrol, 38(S1), pp.S20~7 (1992)
- Filler G, "Cystatin C as a marker of GFR—history, indications, and future research", Clin Biochem, 38, pp.1~8 (2005)
- Knight EL, "Factors influencing serum cystatin C levels other than renal function and the impact on renal function measurement", Kidney Int, 65, pp.1416~1421 (2004)
- Kidney Disease : Improving Global Outcomes(KDIGO)CKD Working Group, "KDIGO 2012 clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease", Kidney Int Suppl, 3, pp.1~150 (2013)
- Ravn B, "Superiority of serum cystatin C over creatinine in prediction of long-term prognosis at discharge from ICU", Crit Care Med, 45, pp.e932~40 (2017)
- Safdar OY, "Serum cystatin is a useful marker for the diagnosis of acute kidney injury in critically ill children : prospective cohort study", BMC Nephrol, 17, pp.130~ (2016)
- Inker LA, "Estimating glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine and cystatin C", N Engl J Med, 367, pp.20~29 (2012)
- Larsson A, "Calibration of the Siemens cystatin C immunoassay has changed over time", Clin Chem, 57, pp.777~778 (2011)
- Bargnoux AS, "Multicenter evaluation of cystatin C measurement after assay standardization", Clin Chem, 63, pp.833~841 (2017)
- Eckfeldt JH, "Performance in measurement of serum cystatin C by laboratories participating in the College of American Pathologists 2014 CYS survey", Arch Pathol Lab Med, 139, pp.888~893 (2015)
- Flodin M, "Variations in assay protocol for the Dako cystatin C method may change patient results by 50% without changing the results for controls", Clin Chem Lab Med, 44, pp.1481~1485 (2006)
- Bargnoux AS, "Reference method and reference material are necessary tools to reveal the variability of cystatin C assays", Arch Pathol Lab Med, 140, pp.117~118 (2016)
- Delanaye P, "Analytical study of three cystatin C assays and their impact on cystatin C-based GFR-prediction equations", Clin Chim Acta, 398, pp.118~124 (2008)
- White CA, "The impact of interlaboratory differences in cystatin C assay measurement on glomerular filtration rate estimation", Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 6, pp.2150~2156 (2011)
- Inker LA, "Expressing the CKD-EPI(Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration)cystatin C equations for estimating GFR with standardized serum cystatin C values", Am J Kidney Dis, 58, pp.682~684 (2011)
- Grubb A, "Generation of a new cystatin C-based estimating equation for glomerular filtration rate by use of 7 assays standardized to the international calibrator", Clin Chem, 60, pp.974~986 (2014)
- Pottel H, "Estimating glomerular filtration rate for the full age spectrum from serum creatinine and cystatin C", Nephrol Dial Transplant, 32, pp.497~507 (2017)
- Pottel H, "Cystatin C-based equation to estimate GFR without the inclusion of race and sex", N Engl J Med, 388, pp.333~343 (2023)
- Ebert N, "Cystatin C standardization decreases assay variation and improves assessment of glomerular filtration rate", Clin Chim Acta, 456, pp.115~121 (2016)
- Flodin M, "Evaluation of Gentian cystatin C reagent on Abbott Ci8200 and calculation of glomerular filtration rate expressed in mL", min, L, pp.Scand J Clin Lab Invest, 2007[DOI]
- "Desirable Biological Variation Database specifications" (2023)[URL]
- Lin L, "Coefficient of accuracy and concordance correlation coefficient : new statistics for methods comparison", PDA J Pharm Sci Technol, 52, pp.55~59 (1998)
- Grubb A, "Simple cystatin C-based prediction equations for glomerular filtration rate compared with the modification of diet in renal disease prediction equation for adults and the Schwartz and the Counahan-Barratt prediction equations for children", Clin Chem, 51, pp.1420~1431 (2005)
- Rule AD, "Using serum creatinine to estimate glomerular filtration rate : accuracy in good health and in chronic kidney disease", Ann Intern Med, 141, pp.929~937 (2004)
- Stevens LA, "Estimating GFR using serum cystatin C alone and in combination with serum creatinine: a pooled analysis of 3,418 individuals with CKD", Am J Kidney Dis, 51, pp.395~406 (2008)
- Larsson A, "Calculation of glomerular filtration rate expressed in mL", min from plasma cystatin C values in mg, Scand J Clin Lab Invest, pp.2004, 64[DOI]
- Tidman M, "A comparison of GFR estimating formulae based upon s-cystatin C and s-creatinine and a combination of the two", Nephrol Dial Transplant, 23, pp.154~160 (2008)
- Grubb A, "First certified reference material for cystatin C in human serum ERM-DA471", IFCC, 2010, pp.48, 1619~1621
- Shlipak MG, "Update on cystatin C : incorporation into clinical practice", Am J Kidney Dis, 62, pp.595~603 (2013)
- Schwartz GJ, "Recalibration of cystatin C using standardized material in Siemens nephelometers", Pediatr Nephrol, 35, pp.279~285 (2020)
- Donadio C, "Prediction of glomerular filtration rate from serum concentration of cystatin C : comparison of two analytical methods", Nephrol Dial Transplant, 27, pp.2826~2838 (2012)
- Benoit SW, "GFR estimation after cystatin C reference material change", Kidney Int Rep, 6, pp.429~436 (2021)
- Erlandsen EJ, "Reference intervals for plasma cystatin C and plasma creatinine in adults using methods traceable to international calibrators and reference methods", J Clin Lab Anal, 32, pp.e22433~ (2018)
- Ataei N, "Early detection of acute kidney injury by serum cystatin C in critically ill children", Pediatr Nephrol, 29, pp.133~138 (2014)
- Murty MS, "Serum cystatin C as a marker of renal function in detection of early acute kidney injury", Indian J Nephrol, 23, pp.180~183 (2013)
- Rule AD, "Limitations of estimating glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine in the general population", Mayo Clin Proc, 81, pp.1427~1434 (2006)
- Zhang Q, "Expression, purification and identification of isotope-labeled recombinant cystatin C protein in Escheichia coli intended for absolute quantification using isotope dilution mass spectrometry", Protein Expr Purif, 178, pp.105785~ (2021)
- Ji H, "Quantification of cystatin-C in human serum by stable isotope dilution liquid chromatography electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry", J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci, 1059, pp.49~55 (2017)