Bias in Laboratory Medicine: The Dark Side of the Moon

키워드

참고문헌 (122)

1. Fraser CG, "Biological variation : from principles to practice" (2001), AACC Press
2. Forsman RW, "Why is the laboratory an afterthought for managed care organizations?", Clin Chem, 42, pp.813~816 (1996)
3. McRae MP, "Smart diagnostics : Combining artificial intelligence and in vitro diagnostics", Sensors(Basel), 22, pp.6355~ (2022)
4. Hicks AJ, "Using clinical guidelines to assess the potential value of laboratory medicine in clinical decision-making", Biochem Med(Zagreb), 31, pp.010703~ (2021)
5. Dybkaer R. Result, "error and uncertainty", Scand J Clin Lab Invest, 55, pp.97~118 (1995)
6. Frenkel R, "Bias in analytical chemistry : A review of selected procedures for incorporating uncorrected bias into the expanded uncertainty of analytical measurements and a graphical method for evaluating the concordance of reference and test procedures", Clin Chim Acta, 495, pp.129~138 (2019)
7. Nielsen AA, "Changing from glucose to HbA1c for diabetes diagnosis : Predictive values of one test and importance of analytical bias and imprecision", Clin Chem Lab Med, 52, pp.1069~1077 (2014)
8. Weykamp C, "Investigation of 2 models to set and evaluate quality targets for hb a1c : Biological variation and sigma-metrics", Clin Chem, 61, pp.752~759 (2015)
9. Mower WR, "Evaluating bias and variability in diagnostic test reports", Ann Emerg Med, 33, pp.85~91 (1999)
10. Schmidt RL, "Understanding sources of bias in diagnostic accuracy studies", Arch Pathol Lab Med, 137, pp.558~565 (2013)
11. Haeckel R, "Bias, its minimization or circumvention to simplify internal quality assurance", J Lab Med, 40, pp.263~270 (2016)
12. Theodorsson E, "Bias in clinical chemistry", Bioanalysis, 6, pp.2855~2875 (2014)
13. "International vocabulary of metrology-Basic and general concepts and associated terms (VIM)3rd ed" (2008)[URL]
14. "Treatment of an observed bias" (2022)[URL]
15. CLSI, "Measurement procedure comparison and bias estimation using patient samples" (2018), Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute
16. Tate J, "Standardisation-The theory and the practice", Clin Biochem Rev, 28, pp.93~96 (2007)
17. Johnson R, "Assessment of bias with emphasis on method comparison", Clin Biochem Rev, 29(Suppl 1), pp.S37~S42 (2008)
18. Millsap RE, "Statistical approaches to measurement invariance" (2012), Routledge
19. Livesey JH, "Pre-analytical requirements", Clin Biochem Rev, 29(suppl 1), pp.S11~S15 (2008)
20. Sandberg S, "Biological variation : Recent development and future challenges", Clin Chem Lab Med, 61, pp.741~750 (2022)
21. "Albert Einstein" (2023)[URL]
22. Menditto A, "Understanding the meaning of accuracy, trueness and precision", Accredit Qual Assur, 12, pp.45~47 (2007)
23. Jhang JS, "Evaluation of linearity in the clinical laboratory", Arch Pathol Lab Med, 128, pp.44~48 (2004)
24. Jeong TD, "Comparison between polynomial regression and weighted least squares regression analysis for verification of analytical measurement range", Clin Chem Lab Med, 60, pp.989~994 (2022)
25. Hazra A, "Biostatistics series module 6 : Correlation and linear regression", Indian J Dermatol, 61, pp.593~601 (2016)
26. Magari RT, "Evaluating agreement between two analytical methods in clinical chemistry", Clin Chem Lab Med, 38, pp.1021~1025 (2000)
27. Ludbrook J, "Comparing methods of measurements", Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol, 24, pp.193~203 (1997)
28. Martínez À, "Detecting proportional and constant bias in method comparison studies by using linear regression with errors in both axes", Chemom Intell Lab Syst, 49, pp.179~193 (1999)
29. Lu MJ, "Sample size for assessing agreement between two methods of measurement by Bland-Altman method", Int J Biostat, 12, pp.20150039~ (2016)
30. Zaki R, "Testing the agreement of medical instruments : Overestimation of bias in the Bland-Altman analysis", Prev Med, 57, pp.S80~S82 (2013)
31. Giavarina D, "Understanding Bland Altman analysis", Biochem Med(Zagreb), 25, pp.141~151 (2015)
32. Bilić-Zulle L, "Comparison of methods : Passing and Bablok regression", Biochem Med(Zagreb), 21, pp.49~52 (2011)
33. Ludbrook J, "Statistical techniques for comparing measurers and methods of measurement : A critical review", Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol, 29, pp.527~536 (2002)
34. Ludbrook J, "Linear regression analysis for comparing two measurers or methods of measurement : But which regression?", Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol, 37, pp.692~699 (2010)
35. Martı́nez A, "Detecting proportional and constant bias in method comparison studies by using linear regression with errors in both axes", Chemometr Intell Lab, 49, pp.179~193 (1999)
36. "Reference materials and reference measuring systems" (2023)[URL]
37. Bunk DM, "Reference materials and reference measurement procedures : An overview from a National Metrology Institute", Clin Biochem Rev, 28, pp.131~137 (2007)
38. Westgard S, "Analytical Sigma metrics : A review of Six Sigma implementation tools for medical laboratories Special issue : Six Sigma metrics Review", Biochem Med, 28, pp.20502~ (2018)
39. Coskun A, "Measurement uncertainty for practical use", Clin Chim Acta, 531, pp.352~360 (2022)
40. Becker D, "Use of NIST Standard Reference Materials for decisions on performance of analytical chemical methods and laboratories" (1992), US Department of Commerce
41. Ioannidis JPA, "Retiring statistical significance would give bias a free pass", Nature, 567, pp.461~ (2019)
42. Badrick T, "Commutability and traceability in EQA programs", Clin Biochem, 56, pp.102~104 (2018)
43. Miller WG, "Specimen materials, target values and commutability for external quality assessment (proficiency testing) schemes", Clin Chim Acta, 327, pp.25~37 (2003)
44. Braga F, "Commutability of reference and control materials : An essential factor for assuring the quality of measurements in Laboratory Medicine", Clin Chem Lab Med, 57, pp.967~973 (2019)
45. Greg Miller W, "The evolving role of commutability in metrological traceability", Clin Chim Acta, 514, pp.84~89 (2021)
46. Horvath AR, "Setting analytical performance specifications based on outcome studies-is it possible?", Clin Chem Lab Med, 53, pp.841~848 (2015)
47. "Evaluation of measurement data-Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement" (2008)[URL]
48. Westgard JO, "Error methods are more practical, but uncertainty methods may still be preferred", Clin Chem, 64, pp.636~638 (2018)
49. Hahn GJ, "Statistical intervals: A guide for practitioners and researchers" (2016), Wiley
50. Rao RS, "The Taguchi methodology as a statistical tool for biotechnological applications : A critical appraisal", Biotechnol J, 3, pp.510~523 (2008)
51. Kiran DR, "Total quality management: Key concepts and case studies", pp.439~445 (2017), Butterworth-Heinemann
52. Panteghini M, "Defining analytical performance specifications 15 years after the Stockholm conference", Clin Chem Lab Med, 53, pp.829~832 (2015)
53. Fraser CG, "The 1999 Stockholm Consensus Conference on quality specifications in laboratory medicine", Clin Chem Lab Med, 53, pp.837~840 (2015)
54. Kallner A, "The Stockholm Consensus Conference on Quality Specifications in Laboratory Medicine, 25-26 April 1999", Scand J Clin Lab Invest, 59, pp.475~ (1999)
55. Sandberg S, "Defining analytical performance specifications : Consensus Statement from the 1st Strategic Conference of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine", Clin Chem Lab Med, 53, pp.833~835 (2015)
56. Haeckel R, "A pragmatic proposal for permissible limits in external quality assessment schemes with a compromise between biological variation and the state of the art", Clin Chem Lab Med, 50, pp.833~839 (2012)
57. Ceriotti F, "Criteria for assigning laboratory measurands to models for analytical performance specifications defined in the 1st EFLM Strategic Conference", Clin Chem Lab Med, 55, pp.189~194 (2017)
58. Bartlett WA, "A checklist for critical appraisal of studies of biological variation", Clin Chem Lab Med, 53, pp.879~885 (2015)
59. Aarsand AK, "The Biological Variation Data Critical Appraisal Checklist : A standard for evaluating studies on biological variation", Clin Chem, 64, pp.501~514 (2018)
60. Carobene A, "The European Biological Variation Study(EuBIVAS) : A summary report", Clin Chem Lab Med, 60, pp.505~517 (2021)
61. Carobene A, "Sample collections from healthy volunteers for biological variation estimates’ update : A new project undertaken by the Working Group on Biological Variation established by the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine", Clin Chem Lab Med, 54, pp.1599~1608 (2016)
62. Díaz-Garzón J, "Biological variation data for lipid cardiovascular risk assessment biomarkers. A systematic review applying the biological variation data critical appraisal checklist (BIVAC)", Clin Chim Acta, 495, pp.467~475 (2019)
63. Marques-Garcia F, "Critical review and meta-analysis of biological variation estimates for tumor markers", Clin Chem Lab Med, 60, pp.494~504 (2022)
64. Coskun A, "Systematic review and meta-analysis of withinsubject and between-subject biological variation estimates of 20 haematological parameters", Clin Chem Lab Med, 58, pp.25~32 (2019)
65. Coşkun A, "Systematic review and meta-analysis of within-subject and between-subject biological variation estimates of serum zinc, copper and selenium", Clin Chem Lab Med, 60, pp.479~482 (2021)
66. Diaz-Garzon J, "Biological variation of cardiac troponins in health and disease : A systematic review and meta-analysis", Clin Chem, 67, pp.256~264 (2021)
67. González-Lao E, "Systematic review of the biological variation data for diabetes related analytes", Clin Chim Acta, 488, pp.61~67 (2019)
68. Fernández-Calle P, "Biological variation estimates of thyroid related measurands-meta-analysis of BIVAC compliant studies", Clin Chem Lab Med, 60, pp.483~493 (2021)
69. Jonker N, "Critical appraisal and meta-analysis of biological variation estimates for kidney related analytes", Clin Chem Lab Med, 60, pp.469~478 (2020)
70. "EFLM Biological Variation Database" (2023)[URL]
71. Petersen PH, "The influence of analytical bias on diagnostic misclassifications", Clin Chim Acta, 260, pp.189~206 (1997)
72. Hyltoft Petersen P, "Valid analytical performance specifications for combined analytical bias and imprecision for the use of common reference intervals", Ann Clin Biochem, 55, pp.612~615 (2018)
73. Ricós C, "Analytical quality specifications for common reference intervals", Clin Chem Lab Med, 42, pp.858~862 (2004)
74. Gowans EMS, "Analytical goals for the acceptance of common reference intervals for laboratories throughout a geographical area", Scand J Clin Lab Invest, 48, pp.757~764 (1988)
75. Krishnamoorthy K, "Handbook of statistical distributions with applications" (2016), Chapman and Hall
76. Coskun A, "Statistical distributions commonly used in measurement uncertainty in laboratory medicine", Biochem Med(Zagreb), 30, pp.010101~ (2020)
77. Petersen PH, "Combination of analytical quality specifications based on biological within-and between-subject variation", Ann Clin Biochem, 39, pp.543~550 (2002)
78. Thelen MHM, "Expressing analytical performance from multi-sample evaluation in laboratory EQA", Clin Chem Lab Med, 55, pp.1509~1516 (2017)
79. Stockl D, "Candidate reference methods for determining target values for cholesterol, creatinine, uric acid, and glucose in external quality assessment and internal accuracy control. I. Method setup", Clin Chem, 39, pp.993~1000 (1993)
80. Uldall A, "A programme for assigning target values for external quality assessment schemes in countries with no authorized reference laboratories. Annex. Experiences with deviating results on Ektachem 700 XR", Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl, 212, pp.31~37 (1993)
81. Miller WG, "Why commutability matters", Clin Chem, 52, pp.553~554 (2006)
82. Zegers I, "The importance of commutability of reference materials used as calibrators : The example of ceruloplasmin", Clin Chem, 59, pp.1322~1329 (2013)
83. Miller WG, "Commutability still matters", Clin Chem, 59, pp.1291~1293 (2013)
84. CLSI, "Characterization and qualification of commutable reference materials for laboratory medicine" (2010), Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute
85. CLSI, "Evaluation of commutability of processed samples" (2022), Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute
86. Korzun WJ, "Difference in bias approach for commutability assessment : Application to frozen pools of human serum measured by 8 direct methods for HDL and LDL cholesterol", Clin Chem, 61, pp.1107~1113 (2015)
87. Budd JR, "IFCC Working Group recommendations for assessing commutability Part 3 : Using the calibration effectiveness of a reference material", Clin Chem, 64, pp.465~474 (2018)
88. Nilsson G, "IFCC Working Group recommendations for assessing commutability Part 2 : Using the difference in bias between a reference material and clinical samples", Clin Chem, 64, pp.455~464 (2018)
89. Miller WG, "IFCC Working Group recommendations for assessing commutability Part 1 : General experimental design", Clin Chem, 64, pp.447~454 (2018)
90. Fuentes-Arderiu X, "Bio-metrological uncertainty in clinical laboratory sciences", EJIFCC, 17, pp.6~7 (2006)
91. Farrance I, "Uncertainty of measurement : A review of the rules for calculating uncertainty components through functional relationships", Clin Biochem Rev, 33, pp.49~75 (2012)
92. Coskun A, "Measurement uncertainty in laboratory medicine : The bridge between medical and industrial metrology", Turk J Biochem, 44, pp.121~125 (2019)
93. Lim YK, "Top-down and bottom-up approaches for the estimation of measurement uncertainty in coagulation assays", Clin Chem Lab Med, 58, pp.1525~1533 (2020)
94. Martinello F, "The top-down approach to measurement uncertainty : Which formula should we use in laboratory medicine?", Biochem Med(Zagreb), 30, pp.020101~ (2020)
95. Burr T, "Bottom-up and top-down uncertainty quantification for measurements", Chemom Intell Lab Syst, 211, pp.104224~ (2021)
96. Lee JH, "Comparison between bottom-up and top-down approaches in the estimation of measurement uncertainty", Clin Chem Lab Med, 53, pp.1025~1032 (2015)
97. Magnusson B, "Routine internaland external-quality control data in clinical laboratories for estimating measurement and diagnostic uncertainty using GUM principles", Scand J Clin Lab Invest, 72, pp.212~220 (2012)
98. Ceriotti F, "Deriving proper measurement uncertainty from Internal Quality Control data : An impossible mission?", Clin Biochem, 57, pp.37~40 (2018)
99. "ISO 15189:2012(en), Medical laboratories — Requirements for quality and competence" (2012)[URL]
100. "ISO/TS 20914:2019(en), Medical laboratories — Practical guidance for the estimation of measurement uncertainty" (2019)[URL]
101. Coskun A, "How can we evaluate differences between serial measurements on the same sample? A new approach based on within-subject biological variation", Clin Chem Lab Med, 55, pp.e44~e46 (2017)
102. Pishro-Nik H, "Introduction to probability, statistics, and random processes", pp.732~ (2014), Kappa Research, LLC
103. Coskun A, "The short story of the long-term Sigma metric : Shift cannot be treated as a linear parameter", Clin Chem Lab Med, 57, pp.E211~E213 (2019)
104. Harry M, "Six Sigma, the breakthrough management strategy revolutionizing the world’s top corporations" (2005), Doubleday
105. Cao S, "Application of Sigma metrics in assessing the clinical performance of verified versus non-verified reagents for routine biochemical analytes", Biochem Med(Zagreb), 28, pp.020709~ (2018)
106. Keleş M, "Evaluation of the clinical chemistry tests analytical performance with Sigma Metric by using different quality specifications-Comparison of analyser actual performance with manufacturer data", Biochem Med(Zagreb), 32, pp.010703~ (2022)
107. Coskun A, "Sigma metric or defects per million opportunities(DPMO) : The performance of clinical laboratories should be evaluated by the Sigma metrics at decimal level with DPMOs", Clin Chem Lab Med, 54, pp.e217~e219 (2016)
108. Coskun A, "Six Sigma revisited : We need evidence to include a 1. 5 SD shift in the extraanalytical phase of the total testing process", Biochem Med(Zagreb), 30, pp.010901~ (2020)
109. Coskun A, "Sigma metric revisited : True known mistakes", Biochem Med(Zagreb), 29, pp.010902~ (2019)
110. Oosterhuis WP, "Sigma metrics in laboratory medicine revisited : We are on the right road with the wrong map", Biochem Med(Zagreb), 28, pp.020503~ (2018)
111. Shaikh MS, "Performance evaluation of a coagulation laboratory using Sigma metrics", Int J Health Care Qual Assur, 31, pp.600~608 (2018)
112. Teshome M, "Total clinical chemistry laboratory errors and evaluation of the analytical quality control using Sigma metric for routine clinical chemistry tests", J Multidiscip Healthc, 14, pp.125~136 (2021)
113. Ozdemir S, "Determination of Sigma metric based on various TEa sources for CBC parameters : The need for Sigma metrics harmonization", J Lab Med, 46, pp.133~141 (2022)
114. Kumar BV, "Sigma metrics as a tool for evaluating the performance of internal quality control in a clinical chemistry laboratory", J Lab Physicians, 10, pp.194~ (2018)
115. Coskun A, "A new approach to calculating the Sigma Metric in clinical laboratories", Accredit Qual Assur, 20, pp.147~152 (2015)
116. Magnusson B, "Treatment of uncorrected measurement bias in uncertainty estimation for chemical measurements", Anal Bioanal Chem, 390, pp.201~213 (2008)
117. Ashwood ER, "Tietz textbook of Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Diagnostics", pp.49~60 (2012), Elsevier
118. Chu K, "An introduction to sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and likelihood ratios", Emerg Med, 11, pp.175~181 (1999)
119. Trevethan R, "Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values: Foundations, pliabilities, and pitfalls in research and practice", Front Public Health, 5, pp.307~ (2017)
120. "Diagnostic testing accuracy: Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and likelihood ratios. StatPearls" (2023)[URL]
121. Leeflang MMG, "Bias in sensitivity and specificity caused by data-driven selection of optimal cutoff values: Mechanisms, magnitude, and solutions", Clin Chem, 54, pp.729~737 (2008)
122. Ringham BM, "Estimates of sensitivity and specificity can be biased when reporting the results of the second test in a screening trial conducted in series", BMC Med Res Methodol, 10, pp.3~ (2010)

관련 논문AI추천