The LEAP Checklist for Laboratory Evaluation and Analytical Performance Characteristics Reporting of Clinical Measurement Procedures
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Reporting a measurement procedure and its analytical performance following method evaluation in a peer-reviewed journal is an important means for clinical laboratory practi- tioners to share their findings. It also represents an important source of evidence base to help others make informed decisions about their practice. At present, there are significant variations in the information reported in laboratory medicine journal publications describ- ing the analytical performance of measurement procedures. These variations also chal- lenge authors, readers, reviewers, and editors in deciding the quality of a submitted manu- script. The International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine Working Group on Method Evaluation Protocols (IFCC WG-MEP) developed a checklist and recom- mends its adoption to enable a consistent approach to reporting method evaluation and analytical performance characteristics of measurement procedures in laboratory medicine journals. It is envisioned that the Laboratory Evaluation and Analytical Performance Char- acteristics (LEAP) checklist will improve the standardisation of journal publications describ- ing method evaluation and analytical performance characteristics, improving the quality of the evidence base that is relied upon by practitioners.
Abstract
Reporting a measurement procedure and its analytical performance following method evaluation in a peer-reviewed journal is an important means for clinical laboratory practi- tioners to share their findings. It also represents an important source of evidence base to help others make informed decisions about their practice. At present, there are significant variations in the information reported in laboratory medicine journal publications describ- ing the analytical performance of measurement procedures. These variations also chal- lenge authors, readers, reviewers, and editors in deciding the quality of a submitted manu- script. The International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine Working Group on Method Evaluation Protocols (IFCC WG-MEP) developed a checklist and recom- mends its adoption to enable a consistent approach to reporting method evaluation and analytical performance characteristics of measurement procedures in laboratory medicine journals. It is envisioned that the Laboratory Evaluation and Analytical Performance Char- acteristics (LEAP) checklist will improve the standardisation of journal publications describ- ing method evaluation and analytical performance characteristics, improving the quality of the evidence base that is relied upon by practitioners.
참고문헌 (8)
- Rifai N, "An Appeal to Medical Journal Editors : The Need for a Full Description of Laboratory Methods and Specimen Handling in Clinical Study Reports", Scand J Clin Lab Invest, 72, pp.89~91 (2012)
- Hand M, "A survey of clinical laboratory instrument verification in the UK and New Zealand", Ann Clin Biochem, 56, pp.275~282 (2019)
- "How to Develop a Reporting Guideline"[URL]
- Bossuyt PM, "STARD 2015 : an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies", BMJ, 351, pp.h5527~ (2015)
- Greaves R, "Toolkit for emerging technologies in laboratory medicine", Clin Chem Lab Med (2023)
- Monaghan PJ, "Practical guide for identifying unmet clinical needs for biomarkers", EJIFCC, 29, pp.129~137 (2018)
- "WMA Declaration of Helsinki - Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects"[URL]
- Sandberg S, "Defining analytical performance specifications : Consensus Statement from the 1st Strategic Conference of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine", Clin Chem Lab Med, 53, pp.833~835 (2015)