본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Comparison of Homologous Recombination Repair Gene Next-Generation Sequencing Analysis in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Between Local and Central Laboratories in Korea

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류병리학

초록

Background: Following success of the phase III PROfound trial, the poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor olaparib was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in May 2020 for adult patients with deleterious homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene-mutated metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). As locally adopted multigene panel next-generation sequencing (NGS) assays for selecting PARP inhibitor candidates have not been thoroughly evaluated, we compared the analytical performance of the FoundationOne CDx (Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA) (central laboratory) and other NGS assays (local laboratory) with samples from the PROfound trial in Korea. Methods: One hundred PROfound samples (60 HRR mutation [HRRm] cases and 40 non-HRRm cases) were analyzed. The results of HRR gene mutation analysis were compared between the FoundationOne CDx and two other NGS assays [SureSelect Custom Design assay (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) and Oncomine Comprehensive assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA)]. Results: The positive percent agreement for single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and insertion/deletions (indels) between the central laboratory and local laboratory was 98.7%–100.0%. The negative percent agreement and overall percent agreement (OPA) for SNVs and indels between central and local laboratories were both 100%. Compared with that of the FoundationOne CDx assay, the OPA for copy number variations of the Oncomine Comprehensive and SureSelect Custom assays reached 99.8%–100%. Most mCRPC patients harboring a deleterious genetic variant were successfully identified with both local laboratory assays. Conclusions: The NGS approach at a local laboratory showed comparable analytical performance for identifying HRRm status to the FoundationOne CDx assay used at the central laboratory.

Abstract

Background: Following success of the phase III PROfound trial, the poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor olaparib was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in May 2020 for adult patients with deleterious homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene-mutated metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). As locally adopted multigene panel next-generation sequencing (NGS) assays for selecting PARP inhibitor candidates have not been thoroughly evaluated, we compared the analytical performance of the FoundationOne CDx (Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA) (central laboratory) and other NGS assays (local laboratory) with samples from the PROfound trial in Korea. Methods: One hundred PROfound samples (60 HRR mutation [HRRm] cases and 40 non-HRRm cases) were analyzed. The results of HRR gene mutation analysis were compared between the FoundationOne CDx and two other NGS assays [SureSelect Custom Design assay (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) and Oncomine Comprehensive assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA)]. Results: The positive percent agreement for single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and insertion/deletions (indels) between the central laboratory and local laboratory was 98.7%–100.0%. The negative percent agreement and overall percent agreement (OPA) for SNVs and indels between central and local laboratories were both 100%. Compared with that of the FoundationOne CDx assay, the OPA for copy number variations of the Oncomine Comprehensive and SureSelect Custom assays reached 99.8%–100%. Most mCRPC patients harboring a deleterious genetic variant were successfully identified with both local laboratory assays. Conclusions: The NGS approach at a local laboratory showed comparable analytical performance for identifying HRRm status to the FoundationOne CDx assay used at the central laboratory.

참고문헌 (16)

  1. Adashek JJ, "Clinical development of PARP inhibitors in treating metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer", Cells, 8, pp.860~ (2019)
  2. Murai J, "Trapping of PARP1 and PARP2 by clinical PARP inhibitors", Cancer Res, 72, pp.5588~5599 (2012)
  3. Ryan CJ, "TRITON3: an international, randomized, open-label, phase III study of the PARP inhibitor rucaparib vs. physician’s choice of therapy for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) associated with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD)", J Clin Oncol, 36, pp.TPS389~ (2018)
  4. Sigorski D, "Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors in prostate cancer: molecular mechanisms, and preclinical and clinical data", Target Oncol, 15, pp.709~722 (2020)
  5. Pritchard CC, "Inherited DNA-repair gene mutations in men with metastatic prostate cancer", N Engl J Med, 375, pp.443~453 (2016)
  6. Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, "The molecular taxonomy of primary prostate cancer", Cell, 163, pp.1011~1025 (2015)
  7. de Bono J, "Olaparib for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer", N Engl J Med, 382, pp.2091~2102 (2020)
  8. Garje R, "PARP inhibitors in prostate and urothelial cancers", Front Oncol, 10, pp.114~ (2020)
  9. Plagnol V, "A robust model for read count data in exome sequencing experiments and implications for copy number variant calling", Bioinformatics, 28, pp.2747~2754 (2012)
  10. Tatsi C, "Large genomic aberrations in corticotropinomas are associated with greater aggressiveness", J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 104, pp.1792~1801 (2019)
  11. CLSI, "User protocol for evaluation of qualitative test performance. 2nd ed. CLSI EP12-A2", Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, ~ (2008)
  12. Khodakov D, "Diagnostics based on nucleic acid sequence variant profiling: PCR, hybridization, and NGS approaches", Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 105, pp.3~19 (2016)
  13. 성문우, "Three-Year Experience of an External Proficieny Testing Survey for ­Next-Generation Sequencing-Based Testing for Germline Mutation", Laboratory Medicine and Quality Assurance, 42(1), pp.48~53 (2020), 대한진단검사정도관리협회[DOI]
  14. Zakrzewski F, "Targeted capture-based NGS is superior to multiplex PCR-based NGS for hereditary BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene analysis in FFPE tumor samples", BMC Cancer, 19, pp.396~ (2019)
  15. Castro E, "Targeting DNA repair : the role of PARP inhibition in the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer", Cancer J, 22, pp.353~356 (2016)
  16. Heeke AL, "Prevalence of homologous recombination-related gene mutations across multiple cancer types", JCO Precis Oncol, 2018 (2018)

관련 논문AI추천

Landscape of Actionable Genetic Alterations Profiled from 1,071 Tumor Samples in Korean Cancer Patients강진형, 고영혜, 김상겸, 김숙영, 김열홍, 김종일, 김지훈, 김철민, 김태원, 김태유, 김형래, 노동영, 라선영, 문형곤, 박근칠, 박웅양, 심준호, 유창식, 유한석, 윤재원, 이광우, 이보람, 이세훈, 이재련, 임석아, 정경해, 정연준, 정현철, 조석기, 하상윤대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2019 · 제51권 제1호2020 Korean guidelines for the management of metastatic prostate cancer김달용, 맹치훈, 이민영, Byeong Seok Sohn, Byung Woog Kang, Chan Kyu Kim, Hee-Jun Kim, Hyo Jin Lee, Hyun Chang, In-Ho Kim, Inkeun Park, Jaeho Cho, Jae Lyun Lee, Jae Young Joung, Jihoon Kang, Jin Young Kim, Joo Han Lim, Joo Young Jung, Junglim Lee, Kwonoh Park, Miso Kim, Sang Joon Shin, Se Hoon Park, Seung Taek Lim, Woo Kyun Bae, Yoon Ji Choi, Young Seok Kim대한내과학회 · The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine2021 · 제36권 제3호Comparison of Survival Outcomes Between Next-Generation Sequencing and Single-Gene Testing in Patients With Advanced Ovarian Cancer in South Korea강동원, 강석범, 박선경, 유예리한국보건의료기술평가학회 · 보건의료기술평가2024 · 제12권 제2호Clinical Impact of Somatic Variants in Homologous Recombination Repair-Related Genes in Ovarian High-Grade Serous Carcinoma박현, 이찬, 강혜윤, 김세화, 김태헌, 송승훈, 안희정, 정상근, 주원덕, 최민철, 황소현대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2020 · 제52권 제2호Clinical practice recommendations for the use of next-generation sequencing in patients with solid cancer: a joint report from KSMO and KSP김미소, 김시현, 김완섭, 김인호, 김지현, 김지형, 김지훈, 김진원, 김한상, 김한조, 김형돈, 나기용, 남수정, 박세훈, 박소연, 박인근, 심효섭, 윤선옥, 윤신교, 윤지나, 윤홍석, 이성영, 이아원, 이인희, 이지은, 이충근, 이혜승, 임선민, 장기택, 전상훈, 정재호, 정현애, 조영미, 차용준, 천재경, 홍숙희, Changhoon Yoo대한병리학회 · Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine2024 · 제58권 제4호Clinical Practice Recommendations for the Use of Next-Generation Sequencing in Patients with Solid Cancer: A Joint Report from KSMO and KSP김미소, 김시현, 김완섭, 김인호, 김지현, 김지형, 김지훈, 김진원, 김한상, 김한조, 김형돈, 나기용, 남수정, 박세훈, 박소연, 박인근, 심효섭, 유창훈, 윤선옥, 윤신교, 윤진아, 윤홍석, 이성영, 이아원, 이인희, 이지은, 이충근, 이혜승, 임선민, 장기택, 전상훈, 정재호, 정현애, 조영미, 차용준, 천재경, 홍숙희대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2024 · 제56권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (22건)