본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Evaluation of Droplet Digital PCR for the Detection of BRAF V600E in Fine-Needle Aspiration Specimens of Thyroid Nodules

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류병리학

초록

Background: Droplet digital (dd)PCR is a new-generation PCR technique with high precision and sensitivity; however, the positive and negative droplets are not always effectively separated because of the “rain” phenomenon. We aimed to develop a practical optimization and evaluation process for the ddPCR assay and to apply it to the detection of BRAF V600E in fine-needle aspiration (FNA) specimens of thyroid nodules, as an example. Methods: We optimized seven ddPCR parameters that can affect “rain.” Analytical and clinical performance were analyzed based on histological diagnosis after thyroidectomy using a consecutive prospective series of 242 FNA specimens. Results: The annealing time and temperature, number of PCR cycles, and primer and probe concentrations were found to be more important considerations for assay optimization than the denaturation time and ramp rate. The limit of blank and 95% limit of detection were 0% and 0.027%, respectively. The sensitivity of ddPCR for histological papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) was 82.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 73.6%–89.2%). The pooled sensitivity of BRAF V600E in FNA specimens for histological PTC was 78.6% (95% CI, 75.9%–81.2%, I2=60.6%). Conclusions: We present a practical approach for optimizing ddPCR parameters that affect the separation of positive and negative droplets to reduce rain. Our approach to optimizing ddPCR parameters can be expanded to general ddPCR assays for specific mutations in clinical laboratories. The highly sensitive ddPCR can compensate for uncertainty in cytological diagnosis by detecting low levels of BRAF V600E.

Abstract

Background: Droplet digital (dd)PCR is a new-generation PCR technique with high precision and sensitivity; however, the positive and negative droplets are not always effectively separated because of the “rain” phenomenon. We aimed to develop a practical optimization and evaluation process for the ddPCR assay and to apply it to the detection of BRAF V600E in fine-needle aspiration (FNA) specimens of thyroid nodules, as an example. Methods: We optimized seven ddPCR parameters that can affect “rain.” Analytical and clinical performance were analyzed based on histological diagnosis after thyroidectomy using a consecutive prospective series of 242 FNA specimens. Results: The annealing time and temperature, number of PCR cycles, and primer and probe concentrations were found to be more important considerations for assay optimization than the denaturation time and ramp rate. The limit of blank and 95% limit of detection were 0% and 0.027%, respectively. The sensitivity of ddPCR for histological papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) was 82.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 73.6%–89.2%). The pooled sensitivity of BRAF V600E in FNA specimens for histological PTC was 78.6% (95% CI, 75.9%–81.2%, I2=60.6%). Conclusions: We present a practical approach for optimizing ddPCR parameters that affect the separation of positive and negative droplets to reduce rain. Our approach to optimizing ddPCR parameters can be expanded to general ddPCR assays for specific mutations in clinical laboratories. The highly sensitive ddPCR can compensate for uncertainty in cytological diagnosis by detecting low levels of BRAF V600E.

참고문헌 (31)

  1. Huggett JF, "Considerations for digital PCR as an accurate molecular diagnostic tool", Clin Chem, 61, pp.79~88 (2015)
  2. Sreejith KR, "Digital polymerase chain reaction technology-recent advances and future perspectives", Lab Chip, 18, pp.3717~3732 (2018)
  3. Cao L, "Advances in digital polymerase chain reaction(dPCR)and its emerging biomedical applications", Biosens Bioelectron, 90, pp.459~474 (2017)
  4. Taylor SC, "Optimization of droplet digital PCR from RNA and DNA extracts with direct comparison to RT-qPCR : clinical implications for quantification of oseltamivir-resistant subpopulations", J Virol Methods, 224, pp.58~66 (2015)
  5. Jones M, "Low copy target detection by Droplet Digital PCR through application of a novel open access bioinformatic pipeline, ‘definetherain’", J Virol Methods, 202, pp.46~53 (2014)
  6. Gerdes L, "Optimization of digital droplet polymerase chain reaction for quantification of genetically modified organisms", Biomol Detect Quantif, 7, pp.9~20 (2016)
  7. Hindson BJ, "High-throughput droplet digital PCR system for absolute quantitation of DNA copy number", Anal Chem, 83, pp.8604~8610 (2011)
  8. Witte AK, "A systematic investigation of parameters influencing droplet rain in the Listeria monocytogenes prfA assay – reduction of ambiguous results in ddPCR", PLoS One, 11, pp.e0168179~ (2016)
  9. Maier J, "Optimized digital droplet PCR for BCR-ABL", J Mol Diagn, 21, pp.27~37 (2019)
  10. Xu X, "Detection of BRAF V600E mutation in fine-needle aspiration fluid of papillary thyroid carcinoma by droplet digital PCR", Clin Chim Acta, 491, pp.91~96 (2019)
  11. Lee ST, "Clinical implication of highly sensitive detection of the BRAF V600E mutation in fine-needle aspirations of thyroid nodules : a comparative analysis of three molecular assays in 4585 consecutive cases in a BRAF V600E mutation-prevalent area", J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 97, pp.2299~2306 (2012)
  12. Park KS, "Evaluation of the Real-Q BRAF V600E detection assay in fine-needle aspiration samples of thyroid nodules", J Mol Diagn, 17, pp.431~437 (2015)
  13. Choi R, "Evaluation of the Anyplex BRAF V600E real-time detection assay using dual-priming oligonucleotide technology in fine-needle aspirates of thyroid nodules", Ann Lab Med, 35, pp.624~629 (2015)
  14. CLSI, "Evaluation of detection capability for clinical laboratory measurement procedures; approved guideline" (2020), Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute
  15. CLSI, "Evaluation of precision performance of quantitative measurement methods; approved guideline" (2004), Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute
  16. Cibas ES, "The 2017 Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology", Thyroid, 27, pp.1341~1346 (2017)
  17. Alexander EK, "Diagnosis of thyroid nodules", Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol, 10, pp.533~539 (2022)
  18. Krauss EA, "Application of the Bethesda classification for thyroid fine-needle aspiration : institutional experience and meta-analysis", Arch Pathol Lab Med, 140, pp.1121~1131 (2016)
  19. Nikiforov YE, "Impact of mutational testing on the diagnosis and management of patients with cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules : a prospective analysis of 1056 FNA samples", J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 96, pp.3390~3397 (2011)
  20. Patel KN, "Performance of a genomic sequencing classifier for the preoperative diagnosis of cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules", JAMA Surg, 153, pp.817~824 (2018)
  21. Steward DL, "Performance of a multigene genomic classifier in thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology : a prospective blinded multicenter study", JAMA Oncol, 5, pp.204~212 (2019)
  22. Cancer Genome Atlas Network, "Integrated genomic characterization of papillary thyroid carcinoma", Cell, 159, pp.676~690 (2014)
  23. Nikiforov YE, "Molecular genetics and diagnosis of thyroid cancer", Nat Rev Endocrinol, 7, pp.569~580 (2011)
  24. Xing M, "Molecular pathogenesis and mechanisms of thyroid cancer", Nat Rev Cancer, 13, pp.184~199 (2013)
  25. Huggett JF, "The digital MIQE guidelines : minimum information for publication of quantitative digital PCR experiments", Clin Chem, 59, pp.892~902 (2013)
  26. dMIQE Group, "The digital MIQE guidelines update : minimum information for publication of quantitative digital PCR experiments for 2020", Clin Chem, 66, pp.1012~1029 (2020)
  27. Fnais N, "Diagnostic value of fine needle aspiration BRAF(V600E)mutation analysis in papillary thyroid cancer : a systematic review and meta-analysis", Hum Pathol, 46, pp.1443~1454 (2015)
  28. Li C, "BRAF V600E mutation and its association with clinicopathological features of papillary thyroid cancer : a meta-analysis", J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 97, pp.4559~4570 (2012)
  29. Liu C, "Associations between BRAF(V600E)and prognostic factors and poor outcomes in papillary thyroid carcinoma : a meta-analysis", World J Surg Oncol, 14, pp.241~ (2016)
  30. Moon S, "et al Effects of coexistent BRAFV600E and TERT promoter mutations on poor clinical outcomes in papillary thyroid cancer : a meta-analysis", Thyroid, 27, pp.651~660 (2017)
  31. Xing M, "Association between BRAF V600E mutation and recurrence of papillary thyroid cancer", J Clin Oncol, 33, pp.42~50 (2015)

관련 논문AI추천

Evaluation of the Anyplex BRAF V600E Real-Time Detection Assay Using Dual-Priming Oligonucleotide Technology in Fine-Needle Aspirates of Thyroid Nodules기창석, 김종원, 박경선, 최리화대한진단검사의학회 · Annals of Laboratory Medicine2015 · 제35권 제6호미세 침 흡인 생검 세포학으로 갑상선의 포르말린 고정한 파라핀포매 블록의 BRAF V600E 돌연변이 분석박원영, 이영남, 한경희대한임상검사과학회 · 대한임상검사과학회지2013 · 제45권 제2호세포 흡인 검사에서 Peptide Nucleic Acid-Mediated PCR Clamping법을 이용한 BRAFV600E 유전자 변이 검사강도영, 강명구, 김대철, 김덕규, 김성흔, 박미경, 박헌수, 이준형, 홍숙희, 홍종철대한내분비외과학회 · Journal of Endocrine Surgery2012 · 제12권 제2호BRAF V600E 돌연변이 검사를 위한 Pyrosequencing 분석법 평가오서영, 이훈택대한임상검사과학회 · 대한임상검사과학회지2015 · 제47권 제1호Detection of BRAFV600E Mutations in Papillary Thyroid Carcinomas by Peptide Nucleic Acid Clamp Real-Time PCR: A Comparison with Direct Sequencing김창진, 김형주, 박두산, 박소영, 양승하, 오미혜, 이성수, 이성제, 이완주, 이혜란, 정동준, 정유준, 조현득, Wenxia Mu대한병리학회 · Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine2012 · 제46권 제1호BRAFV600E Test for Suspicious Lateral Lymph Nodes in Papillary Thyroid Cancer김완욱, 박지영, 이지연, 정진향, Ho Yong Park, Hyang Hee Choi, Seung Ook Hwang대한내분비외과학회 · Journal of Endocrine Surgery2016 · 제16권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (25건)