본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한국 영어 학습자들의 영어 읽기-쓰기 통합형 과업 수행에서 전략 사용과 과업 수행

Korean EFL learners’ strategy use and performance in an English integrated reading-to-write task

0

조회

0

다운로드

17

인용

0

참고문헌

초록

An increasing number of foreign language assessments are employing integrated writing tasks that involve different language modalities such as reading or listening (Plakans, 2009b). Thus, it is necessary for understanding how test-takers use strategies to complete their integrated tasks. This study investigated what strategies Korean learners of English used in an English integrated-reading-to-write task and its relationship to test performance, using quantitative and qualitative approaches. 41 Korean college-level students participated in completing an English integrated reading to write task. For quantitative data, the survey results on the participants’ strategy use and their writing performance results were collected. For qualitative data, focus group interviews were conducted. The survey questionnaires were modified by the Strategy Inventory for Integrated Writing (Yang & Plakans, 2012) which includes three strategy categories: self-regulatory, discourse synthesis, and “test-wiseness” of strategy use. The results revealed that Korean learners of English used goal-setting and self-regulatory strategies more often than discourse synthesis strategies such as connecting, selecting, and organizing. The participants’ self-regulatory strategy use had a positive impact on their performance, however, the participants’ “test-wiseness” strategy use had a negative impact on their performance. The findings provide pedagogical implications for second language assessment, learning, and teaching.

Abstract

An increasing number of foreign language assessments are employing integrated writing tasks that involve different language modalities such as reading or listening (Plakans, 2009b). Thus, it is necessary for understanding how test-takers use strategies to complete their integrated tasks. This study investigated what strategies Korean learners of English used in an English integrated-reading-to-write task and its relationship to test performance, using quantitative and qualitative approaches. 41 Korean college-level students participated in completing an English integrated reading to write task. For quantitative data, the survey results on the participants’ strategy use and their writing performance results were collected. For qualitative data, focus group interviews were conducted. The survey questionnaires were modified by the Strategy Inventory for Integrated Writing (Yang & Plakans, 2012) which includes three strategy categories: self-regulatory, discourse synthesis, and “test-wiseness” of strategy use. The results revealed that Korean learners of English used goal-setting and self-regulatory strategies more often than discourse synthesis strategies such as connecting, selecting, and organizing. The participants’ self-regulatory strategy use had a positive impact on their performance, however, the participants’ “test-wiseness” strategy use had a negative impact on their performance. The findings provide pedagogical implications for second language assessment, learning, and teaching.

참고문헌 (36)

  1. 성태제, , 국가영어능력평가시험 및 영어과 교육과정 개정 공청회 자료집 (2011), 한국교육과정평가원
  2. 이진영, "영어 읽기 및 쓰기 능력 신장을 위한 요약활동의 효과에 관한 연구", 영어교과교육, 9(1), pp.133~154 (2010), 한국영어교과교육학회
  3. 최윤희, "학교 단위 영어 말하기, 쓰기 평가 방법 개선-교수학습 방법의 변화를 중심으로", 한국중등영어교육학회 발표 논문집, pp.143~183 (2011)
  4. 한상호, "학습 전략 의식화가 대학생 영어 청해 능력에 미치는 영향", 영어교과교육, 1(1), pp.135~158 (2002)
  5. Bachman, L. F., "Fundamental considerations in language testing" (1990), Oxford University Press
  6. Bachman, L. F., "Language teaching in practice" (1996), Oxford University Press
  7. Bialystok, E., "The role of conscious strategies in second language proficiency", Modern Language Journal, 65, pp.24~35 (1981)
  8. Canale, M., "Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching", Applied Linguistics, 1, pp.1~47 (1980)
  9. Cohen, A. D., "Strategies in learning and using a second language" (1998), Longman
  10. Cohen, A. D., "“I want to go back to the text”: Response strategies on the reading subtest of the new TOEFL", Language Testing, 24, pp.209~250 (2007)
  11. Cumming, A., "Difference in written discourse in independent and integratedprototype tasks for next generation TOEFL", Assessing Writing, 10, pp.5~43 (2005)
  12. Douglas, D., "Assessing languages for specific purposes" (1997), Cambridge University Press
  13. Dreyer, C., "Learning strategies and other predictors of ESL proficiency among African speakers in South Africa, In Language learning strategies around the world: Cross-cultural perspectives", pp.61~74 (1996), University of Hawaii Press
  14. Ellis, R., "The study of second language acquisition" (1994), Oxford University Press
  15. Hyland, T. A., "A study of the practices of EL1 and EL2 students in reporting information from sources in a timed writing proficiency assessment", 박사, pp.2005
  16. Færch, G., "Processes and strategies in foreign language learning and communication", Interlanguage Studies Bulletin, 5, pp.47~118 (1980)
  17. Færch, G., "Communication strategies: Psycholinguistic and sociolingiuistic perspectives" (1997), Longman
  18. Green, N. M., "A closer look at learning strategies, L2 proficiency, and gender", TESOL Quarterly, 29, pp.261~297 (1995)
  19. Kunnan, A. J., , Validation in language assessment: Selected papers form the 17th Language Testing Research Colloquium (1998), Lawrence Erlbaum
  20. O'Malley, M. J., "Learning strategies in second language acquisition" (1990), Cambridge University Press
  21. Oxford, R. L., "Language learning strategies" (1990), Newbury House
  22. Oxford, R. L., "Adults’ language learning strategies in an intensive foreign language program in the United States", System, 23, pp.38~45 (1995)
  23. Phakiti, A., "A closer look at the relationship of cognitive and metacognitive strategy use to EFL reading achievement test", Language Testing, 20, pp.26~56 (2003)
  24. Plakans, L., "Comparing composing processes in writing-only and reading-to-write test tasks", Assessing Writing, 13, pp.111~129 (2008)
  25. Plakans, L., "Discourse synthesis in integrated second language writing assessment", Language Testing, 26, pp.561~587 (2009)
  26. Plakans, L., "The role of reading strategies in integrated L2 writing tasks", Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 8, pp.252~266 (2009)
  27. Purpura, J. E., "Investigating the effects of strategy use and second language test performance with high-and low-ability test-takers: A structural equation modeling approach", Language Testing, 15, pp.333~379 (1999)
  28. Rubin, J., "What the "good language learner" can teach us", TESOL Quarterly, 9, pp.41~51 (1975)
  29. Language learner strategy use and English Proficiency on the Michigan English Language Assessment Battery, "Song, X.", 1~26, pp.Spaan Fellow Working Papers in Second or Foreign Language Assessment, 3 (2005)
  30. Spivey, N., "The constructivist metaphor: Reading, writing, and the making of meaning" (1997), Academic Press
  31. Stein, V., "Exploring the cognition of reading-to-write, In Reading-to-write: Exploring a cognitive and social process", pp.119~143 (1990), Oxford University Press
  32. Swain, M., "Examining dialogue: Another approach to content specification and to validating inferences drawn from test scores", Langage Testing, 18, pp.275~306 (2001)
  33. The speaking section of the TOEFL iBT (SSTiBT): Test-takers’ reported strategic behaviors, "Swain, M.", TOEFL iBT, ~, pp.TOEFL iBT Research Report. Number: RR-09-30, TOEFLiBT-10 (2009)
  34. Wesche, M. B., "Second language performance testing: The Ontario test of ESL as an example", Language Testing, 4, pp.28~47 (1987)
  35. Wharton, G., "Language learning strategy use of bilingual foreign language learners in Singapore", Language Learning, 50, pp.203~243 (2000)
  36. Yang, H-C., "Second language writers’ strategy use and performance on an integrated reading-listening-writing Task", TESOL Quarterly, 46(1), pp.80~101 (2012)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)