소아청소년 진정내시경: 대한소아소화기영양학회 학술위원회 조사 보고
Pediatric Endoscopic Sedation in Korea: A Survey of the Korean Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition
2
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: The aim of this survey was to analyze the choice of sedative drugs and their side effects during pediatric endoscopic sedation in Korea. We also evaluated doctors, caretakers and patient satisfaction with the procedures. Methods: Between June 2006 and July 2006, a 16-item survey regarding current sedation practices, during one month, was mailed to 28 hospitals in Korea. The results of the survey responses were then analyzed. Results: Endoscopy performed under conscious sedation was reported in 89.0% of the responders and endoscopy under general anesthesia in 0.9% of 465 endoscopic procedures. Endoscopy under conscious sedation was performed in 89.1% for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (GFS) and 88.1% for lower GFS. Midazolam was used for conscious sedation during the endoscopy in 84.5% of cases and propofol was used in two cases (0.5%). In addition, a bezodiazepine/opioid combination was used iin 84.6% (44 cases) for lower GFS. Patients were monitored with pulse oxymetry, EKG (91.4%) as well as automatic BP (5.1%). Transient hypoxia was the only side effect noted and was treated with supplemental oxygen (4.6%). Flumazenil was used in 2.71% of cases. The choice of sedation was made by the endoscopist (84%). The satisfaction rate for endoscopists was 68%, and for the patients and caretakers was 84% (as reported by the endoscopists). Conclusion: Midazolam was used only for the upper GFS and benzodiazepine/opioid combination was used for the lower GFS in Korea. The rate of satisfaction was relatively high and there were no significant side effects noted during the endoscopy under conscious sedation.
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this survey was to analyze the choice of sedative drugs and their side effects during pediatric endoscopic sedation in Korea. We also evaluated doctors, caretakers and patient satisfaction with the procedures. Methods: Between June 2006 and July 2006, a 16-item survey regarding current sedation practices, during one month, was mailed to 28 hospitals in Korea. The results of the survey responses were then analyzed. Results: Endoscopy performed under conscious sedation was reported in 89.0% of the responders and endoscopy under general anesthesia in 0.9% of 465 endoscopic procedures. Endoscopy under conscious sedation was performed in 89.1% for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (GFS) and 88.1% for lower GFS. Midazolam was used for conscious sedation during the endoscopy in 84.5% of cases and propofol was used in two cases (0.5%). In addition, a bezodiazepine/opioid combination was used iin 84.6% (44 cases) for lower GFS. Patients were monitored with pulse oxymetry, EKG (91.4%) as well as automatic BP (5.1%). Transient hypoxia was the only side effect noted and was treated with supplemental oxygen (4.6%). Flumazenil was used in 2.71% of cases. The choice of sedation was made by the endoscopist (84%). The satisfaction rate for endoscopists was 68%, and for the patients and caretakers was 84% (as reported by the endoscopists). Conclusion: Midazolam was used only for the upper GFS and benzodiazepine/opioid combination was used for the lower GFS in Korea. The rate of satisfaction was relatively high and there were no significant side effects noted during the endoscopy under conscious sedation.
참고문헌 (16)
- Vargo JJ, "Propofol: a gastroenterologist's perspective", Gastrointest Endosc, 14, pp.313~323 (2004)
- Aisenberg J, "Sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy: new practices, new economics", Am J Gastroenterol, 100, pp.996~1000 (2005)
- Cohen LB, "Endoscopic sedation in the United States: results from a nationwide survey", Am J Gastroenterol, 101, pp.967~974 (2006)
- Michaud L, "Francophone Pediatric Hepatology, Gastroenterology, and Nutrition Group. Sedation for diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a survey of the Francophone Pediatric Hepatology, Gastroenterology, and Nutrition Group", Endoscopy, 37, pp.167~170 (2005)
- Lightdale JR, "Schwarz SM, Liacouras CA. Methods of sedation in pediatric endoscopy: a survey of NASPGHAN members", J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr, 45, pp.500~502 (2007)
- LinksZaman A, "Unsedated peroral endoscopy with a video ultrathin endoscope: patient acceptance, tolerance, and diagnostic accuracy", Am J Gastroenterol, 93, pp.1260~1263 (1998)
- Koh JL, "Schmitz ML. Experience with an anesthesiologist interventional model for endoscopy in a pediatric hospital", J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr, 33, pp.314~318 (2001)
- Pieri L, "Preclinical pharmacology of midazolam", Br J Clin Pharmacol, 16(1), pp.17~27 (1983)
- Mamula P, "Safety of intravenous midazolam and fentanyl for pediatric GI endoscopy: prospective study of 1578 endoscopies", Gastrointest Endosc, 65, pp.203~210 (2007)
- Malviya S, "Prolonged recovery and delayed side effects of sedation for diagnostic imaging studies in children", Pediatrics, 105, pp.42~ (2000)
- Gremse DA, "Conscious sedation with high-dose midazolam for pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy", South Med J, 90, pp.821~825 (1997)
- Heuss LT, "Changing patterns of sedation and monitoring practice during endoscopy: results of a nationwide survey in Switzerland", Endoscopy, 37, pp.161~166 (2005)
- Koshy G, "Pitchumoni CS. Propofol versus midazolam and meperidine for conscious sedation in GI endoscopy", Am J Gastroenterol, 95, pp.1476~1479 (2000)
- Elitsur Y, "Propofol sedation for endoscopic procedures in children", Endoscopy, 32, pp.788~791 (2000)
- Ali S, "Comparison of fentanyl versus meperidine for analgesia in pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy", Dig Dis Sci, 49, pp.888~891 (2004)
- 서정기, "내시경 시술", 제28회 대한소화기내시경학회세미나, pp.36~46 (2003)