Propofol with and without Midazolam for Diagnostic Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopies in Children
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: Various publications on the use of sedation and anesthesia for diagnostic procedures in children have demonstrated that no ideal agent is available. Although propofol has been widely used for sedation during esophagogastroduodenoscopy in children, adverse events including hypoxia and hypotension, are concerns in propofol-based sedation. Propofol is used in combination with other sedatives in order to reduce potential complications. We aimed to analyze whether the administration of midazolam would improve the safety and efficacy of propofol-based sedation in diagnostic esophagogastroduodenoscopies in children. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the hospital records of children who underwent diagnostic esophagogastroduodenoscopies during a 30-month period. Demographic characteristics, vital signs, medication dosages, induction times, sedation times, recovery times, and any complications observed, were examined. Results: Baseline characteristics did not differ between the midazolam-propofol and propofol alone groups. No differences were observed between the two groups in terms of induction times, sedation times, recovery times, or the proportion of satisfactory endoscopist responses. No major procedural complications, such as cardiac arrest, apnea, or laryngospasm, occurred in any case. However, minor complications developed in 22 patients (10.7%), 17 (16.2%) in the midazolam-propofol group and five (5.0%) in the propofol alone group ( p =0.010). Conclusion: The sedation protocol with propofol was safe and efficient. The administration of midazolam provided no additional benefit in propofol-based sedation.
Abstract
Purpose: Various publications on the use of sedation and anesthesia for diagnostic procedures in children have demonstrated that no ideal agent is available. Although propofol has been widely used for sedation during esophagogastroduodenoscopy in children, adverse events including hypoxia and hypotension, are concerns in propofol-based sedation. Propofol is used in combination with other sedatives in order to reduce potential complications. We aimed to analyze whether the administration of midazolam would improve the safety and efficacy of propofol-based sedation in diagnostic esophagogastroduodenoscopies in children. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the hospital records of children who underwent diagnostic esophagogastroduodenoscopies during a 30-month period. Demographic characteristics, vital signs, medication dosages, induction times, sedation times, recovery times, and any complications observed, were examined. Results: Baseline characteristics did not differ between the midazolam-propofol and propofol alone groups. No differences were observed between the two groups in terms of induction times, sedation times, recovery times, or the proportion of satisfactory endoscopist responses. No major procedural complications, such as cardiac arrest, apnea, or laryngospasm, occurred in any case. However, minor complications developed in 22 patients (10.7%), 17 (16.2%) in the midazolam-propofol group and five (5.0%) in the propofol alone group ( p =0.010). Conclusion: The sedation protocol with propofol was safe and efficient. The administration of midazolam provided no additional benefit in propofol-based sedation.
참고문헌 (26)
- Abraham NS, "Sedation versus no sedation in the performance of diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy : a Canadian randomized controlled cost-outcome study", Am J Gastroenterol, 99, pp.1692~1699 (2004)
- van Beek EJ, "Safe and effective procedural sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy in children", J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr, 54, pp.171~185 (2012)
- Isik IA, "Sedation practice outside the operating room for pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy", Indian Pediatr, 52, pp.989~990 (2015)
- Dewitt J, "Nurse-administered propofol sedation compared with midazolam and meperidine for EUS : a prospective, randomized trial", Gastrointest Endosc, 68, pp.499~509 (2008)
- Heuss LT, "Safety of propofol for conscious sedation during endoscopic procedures in high-risk patients-a prospective, controlled study", Am J Gastroenterol, 98, pp.1751~1757 (2003)
- Tohda G, "Propofol sedation during endoscopic procedures : safe and effective administration by registered nurses supervised by endoscopists", Endoscopy, 38, pp.360~367 (2006)
- Akbulut UE, "A comparison of sedation with midazolam-ketamine versus propofol-fentanyl during endoscopy in children : a randomized trial", Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 29, pp.112~118 (2017)
- Kim EH, "Effect of the midazolam added with propofol-based sedation in esophagogastroduodenoscopy : a randomized trial", J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 33, pp.894~899 (2018)
- Ulas Emre Akbulut, "Efficacy and Safety of Low Dose Ketamine and Midazolam Combination for Diagnostic Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopyin Children", Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition, 18(3), pp.160~167 (2015), 대한소아소화기영양학회
- Triantafillidis JK, "Sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy : current issues", World J Gastroenterol, 19, pp.463~481 (2013)
- Horn E, "Pharmacology and pharmacokinetics of sedatives and analgesics", Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am, 14, pp.247~268 (2004)
- Lowrie L, "The pediatric sedation unit : a mechanism for pediatric sedation", Pediatrics, 102, pp.E30~ (1998)
- De Silva AP, "One-hour fast for water and six-hour fast for solids prior to endoscopy provides good endoscopic vision and results in minimum patient discomfort", J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 24, pp.1095~1097 (2009)
- Ramsay MA, "Controlled sedation with alphaxalone-alphadolone", BMJ, 2, pp.656~659 (1974)
- Aldrete JA, "Modifications to the postanesthesia score for use in ambulatory surgery", J Perianesth Nurs, 13, pp.148~155 (1998)
- VanNatta ME, "Propofol alone titrated to deep sedation versus propofol in combination with opioids and", or benzodiazepines and titrated to moderate sedation for colonoscopy, 2006, pp.101, 2209~2217
- Lazzaroni M, "Preparation, premedication and surveillance", Endoscopy, 35, pp.103~111 (2003)
- Disma N, "Propofol sedation with fentanyl or midazolam during oesophagogastroduodenoscopy in children", Eur J Anaesthesiol, 22, pp.848~852 (2005)
- Vargo JJ, "American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases; American College of Gasteroenterology Position statement: Nonanesthesiologist administration of propofol for GI endoscopy", Gastroenterology, 137, pp.2161~2167 (2009)
- Cohen LB, "Moderate level sedation during endoscopy : a prospective study using low-dose propofol, meperidine", fentanyl, and midazolam, 2004, pp.59, 795~803
- McQuaid KR, "A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials of moderate sedation for routine endoscopic procedures", Gastrointest Endosc, 67, pp.910~923 (2008)
- Byrne MF, "Propofol use for sedation during endoscopy in adults : a Canadian Association of Gastroenterology position statement", Can J Gastroenterol, 22, pp.457~459 (2008)
- Simsek M, "Comparison of sedation method in pediatrics cardiac catheterization", Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci, 20, pp.1490~1494 (2016)
- Lamireau T, "Oxygen saturation during esophagogastroduodenoscopy in children : general anesthesia versus intravenous sedation", J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr, 27, pp.172~175 (1998)
- Olkkola KT, "Midazolam and other benzodiazepines", Handb Exp Pharmacol, 182, pp.335~360 (2008)
- Hari Keerthy P, "Comparitive evaluation of propofol and midazolam as conscious sedatives in minor oral surgery", J Maxillofac Oral Surg, 14, pp.773~783 (2015)