다학제적 디자인 교육 모형의 특성 분석 - 국외 사례 비교연구 중심으로 -

Abstract

From the Industrial Revolution through the development of the information age with current technologies, ranging from the community has been a leveling of the information is quantitative expansion. Relatively, Qualitative development is lagging behind compared to quantitative developed. Therefore, in each region recognized the need for a wave of another change. The development of a simple technique was more difficult to meet the growing development of the rapidly changing contemporary flows and only in one study area it is difficult to happen innovative change. So we should break down the boundaries with other disciplines and work through collaboration. In addition, it is urgent to establish appropriate education system. Design area was characterized by a interdisciplinary basis. And design education could be facilitated collaboration with other disciplines because of the education oriented creativity. Therefore, multidisciplinary design education is current and it plays an important role in cultivating innovative products and human resources required for the future of society is necessary for this study. This study is about to define what is an interdisciplinary design education and proposed design of an interdisciplinary model by J. Dublin, Lawrence peers, John Blake. In addition, with respect to the design of multidisciplinary courses in the humanities and social progress, economic and various fields such as the arts were training in foreign universities who have performed over the years. Examples include interdisciplinary design education in the United States or to the reputation of Stanford D. School, UK RCA IDE (Innovation Design Engineering), Finland UIAH for IDBM (International Design Business Management program), Netherlands Delft University of Technology IDE (School of Industrial Design all that is going on in Engineering) are those of the interdisciplinary design education system and programs. It was a comparative analysis for these educational goals, processes, features and proposed to identify the difference and similarities between them. So, This study propose a domestic the efficient and effective factors to consider when designing an interdisciplinary design education and research system in the future.