Atypical β-Catenin Activated Child Hepatocellular Tumor
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Hepatocellular adenomas are a benign, focal, hepatic neoplasm that have been divided into four subtypes according to the genetic and pathological features. The β-catenin activated subtype accounts for 10-15% of all hepatocellular adenomas and specific magnetic resonance imaging features have been defined for different hepatocellular ad-enomas subtypes. The current study aimed to report the magnetic resonance imaging features of a well differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma that developed on the basis of β-catenin activated hepatocellular adenomas in a child. In this case, atypical diffuse steatosis was determined in the lesion. In the literature, diffuse steatosis, which is defined as a feature of the hepatocyte nuclear factor-1α-inactivated hepatocellular adenomas subtype, has not been pre-viously reported in any β-catenin activated hepatocellular adenomas case. Interlacing magnetic resonance imaging findings between subtypes show that there are still many mysteries about this topic and larger studies are warranted.
Abstract
Hepatocellular adenomas are a benign, focal, hepatic neoplasm that have been divided into four subtypes according to the genetic and pathological features. The β-catenin activated subtype accounts for 10-15% of all hepatocellular adenomas and specific magnetic resonance imaging features have been defined for different hepatocellular ad-enomas subtypes. The current study aimed to report the magnetic resonance imaging features of a well differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma that developed on the basis of β-catenin activated hepatocellular adenomas in a child. In this case, atypical diffuse steatosis was determined in the lesion. In the literature, diffuse steatosis, which is defined as a feature of the hepatocyte nuclear factor-1α-inactivated hepatocellular adenomas subtype, has not been pre-viously reported in any β-catenin activated hepatocellular adenomas case. Interlacing magnetic resonance imaging findings between subtypes show that there are still many mysteries about this topic and larger studies are warranted.
참고문헌 (9)
- Chung EM, "From the archives of the AFIP: pediatric liver masses: radiologic-pathologic correlation part 1. Benign tumors", Radiographics, 30, pp.801~826 (2010)
- van Aalten SM, "Hepatocellular adenomas: correlation of MR imaging findings with pathologic subtype classification", Radiology, 261, pp.172~181 (2011)
- Laumonier H, "Hepatocellular adenomas:magnetic resonance imaging features as a function of molecular pathological classification", Hepatology, 48, pp.808~818 (2008)
- Yoneda N, "Beta-catenin-activated hepatocellular adenoma showing hyperintensity on hepatobiliaryphase gadoxetic-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and overexpression of OATP8", Jpn J Radiol, 30, pp.777~782 (2012)
- Chu HH, "β-catenin activated hepatocellular adenoma", Clin Mol Hepatol, 19, pp.185~189 (2013)
- Manichon AF, "Hepatocellular adenoma:evaluation with contrast-enhanced ultrasound and MRI and correlation with pathologic and phenotypic classification in 26 lesions", HPB Surg, 2012, pp.418745~ (2012)
- Shanbhogue AK, "Recent advances in cytogenetics and molecular biology of adult hepatocellular tumors: implications for imaging and management", Radiology, 258, pp.673~693 (2011)
- Katabathina VS, "Genetics and imaging of hepatocellular adenomas: 2011 update", Radiographics, 31, pp.1529~1543 (2011)
- Zucman-Rossi J, "Genotype-phenotype correlation in hepatocellular adenoma: new classification and relationship with HCC", Hepatology, 43, pp.515~524 (2006)