다이빙용 웨트수트(wetsuit) 소재에 대한 소비자 인식조사와 물성 비교
Consumer recognition and mechanical property comparisonof wetsuit material for diving
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Consumer and property evaluation of wetsuit materials were conducted to obtain useful data for developing competitive products that meet consumer expectations and improving industrial competitiveness. Data were collected through online surveys of 213 domestic consumers who have experienced wearing wetsuit among marine leisure activities. Five types of commercial wet suit materials by brand and four types of commercial wet suit materials with the same quality by thickness were collected. Then, their physical properties, salt water resistance and thermal insulation rate were evaluated and compared. As a result, the most commonly used wetsuit material is 3 to 5 mm thick, and the basic jersey material is bonded on both sides. As a processing for imparting functionality, processing for improving warmth and reducing surface resistance are most frequently used. Consumers often feel uncomfortable when wearing a wetsuit, such as wearing comfort, weight, ease of movement, stretchability, and clothing pressure, which are different from those of casual wear. Also, mechanical strength and warmth were considered to be the most important criteria for selection of wetsuit material for purchase or rental. The mechanical properties of brand A and B were better than those of brand C, D, and E. Resilience and thermal shrinkage were better in brand C, D, and E. On the other hand, there was no significant difference in the physical properties due to the difference in thickness of the material at the same quality. Also, it was found that the thicker the material, the more stable it is in the heat. Brand A and B had superior salt water resistance than brand C, D, and E. In the thermal insulation test, brand A and B showed better insulation characteristics than brand C, D, and E, but the types of bonded fabric and surface finishing of materials were thought to have affected. In comparison of the thickness, the thicker the materials, the better the salt resistance and the thermal insulation.
Abstract
Consumer and property evaluation of wetsuit materials were conducted to obtain useful data for developing competitive products that meet consumer expectations and improving industrial competitiveness. Data were collected through online surveys of 213 domestic consumers who have experienced wearing wetsuit among marine leisure activities. Five types of commercial wet suit materials by brand and four types of commercial wet suit materials with the same quality by thickness were collected. Then, their physical properties, salt water resistance and thermal insulation rate were evaluated and compared. As a result, the most commonly used wetsuit material is 3 to 5 mm thick, and the basic jersey material is bonded on both sides. As a processing for imparting functionality, processing for improving warmth and reducing surface resistance are most frequently used. Consumers often feel uncomfortable when wearing a wetsuit, such as wearing comfort, weight, ease of movement, stretchability, and clothing pressure, which are different from those of casual wear. Also, mechanical strength and warmth were considered to be the most important criteria for selection of wetsuit material for purchase or rental. The mechanical properties of brand A and B were better than those of brand C, D, and E. Resilience and thermal shrinkage were better in brand C, D, and E. On the other hand, there was no significant difference in the physical properties due to the difference in thickness of the material at the same quality. Also, it was found that the thicker the material, the more stable it is in the heat. Brand A and B had superior salt water resistance than brand C, D, and E. In the thermal insulation test, brand A and B showed better insulation characteristics than brand C, D, and E, but the types of bonded fabric and surface finishing of materials were thought to have affected. In comparison of the thickness, the thicker the materials, the better the salt resistance and the thermal insulation.
참고문헌 (23)
- 김정미, "윈드서핑 수트의 시각적 이미지에 관한 연구", 한국의류산업학회지, 14(5), pp.713~719 (2012), 한국의류산업학회
- 김혜림, "시판 습식방수복의 부위별 소재 특성 및 보온성 평가", 한국섬유공학회지, 53(4), pp.229~240 (2016), 한국섬유공학회
- 김혜림, "나노웹으로 코팅된 네오프렌 직물의 제조 및 특성분석", 한국섬유공학회지, 53(2), pp.109~119 (2016), 한국섬유공학회
- 박정현, "낙상 보호 팬츠개발을 위한 충격흡수 소재특성 평가", 한국의류학회지, 40(3), pp.495~505 (2016), 한국의류학회
- "헬로! 서핑&혼캠족 '장비는 챙겼니?'" (2016)[URL]
- 이선희, "해양용 방수복 제품 동향", 섬유기술과 산업, 21(1), pp.30~36 (2017)
- 최진희, "국내 30대 남성용 웨트수트 패턴 축소율에 관한 연구", 한국의류학회지, 35(9), pp.1039~1048 (2011), 한국의류학회
- 최진희, "국내 남성용 스킨스쿠버복 생산실태 및 소비자 만족도", 한국의류학회지, 33(11), pp.1683~1695 (2009), 한국의류학회
- 허재호, "습식잠수복(wetsuit)의 성능 및 기능성 평가", 섬유기술과 산업, 21(1), pp.37~43 (2017)
- 허희진, "웨트수트 착용실태 및 제품개발을 위한 사이즈 체계 조사 -국내 브랜드와 수입 브랜드의 비교를 중심으로-", 한국의류학회지, 39(3), pp.408~418 (2015), 한국의류학회
- Aboshio, A., "Experimental investigation of the mechanical properties of neoprene coated nylon wovenreinforced composites", Compos. Struct, 120(2015), pp.386~393 (2014)[DOI]
- Standard test method for rubber property durometer hardness, "American Society for Testing Materials", ASTM International, ~, pp.ASTM D2240-05 (2010)
- Standard test method for rubber property-Compression set, "American Society for Testing Materials", ASTM International, ~, pp.ASTM D395-18 (2018)
- "BS EN 142251:2005, Diving suits-Part 1: Wet suits-Requirements and test methods", British Standard Institution, ~ (2018)
- "ISO 1629, Rubber and lattices-Nomenclature", International Standard, ~ (2013)
- Kim, C., "Thermal resistance values of skinscuba clothing materials", Journal of the Design Research Institute of Kyunghee University, 3, pp.119~125 (2000)
- Korean Standard, "KS M ISO 34-18:2014, Rubber, vulcanized or thermoplastic-Determination of tear strength-part 1: Trouser, angle and crescent test pieces", Korean Agency for Technology and Standards, ~ (2012)
- Korean Standard, "KS M ISO 1798:2012, Flexible cellular polymeric materials-Determination of tensile strength and elongation at break", Korean Agency for Technology and Standards, ~ (2012)
- Korean Standard, "KS M 6518:2016, Physical testing methods for vulcanized rubber", Korean Agency for Technology and Standards, ~ (2016)
- Korean Standard, "KS M 6660:2016, Physical testing method of expanded rubber", Korean Agency for Technology and Standards, ~ (2016)
- Korean Standard, "KS M ISO 8307:2008, Flexible cellular polymeric materials-Determination of resilience by ball rebound", Korean Agency for Technology and Standards, ~ (2008)
- Material Improvements, "Patagonia environmental & social initiatives 2016", 50~51 (2016)
- Naebe, M., "Assessment of performance properties of wetsuit", Proceeding. of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part P, 227(4), pp.255~264 (2013)