물세탁과 드라이클리닝의 세탁성능과 형태안정성 비교
A comparison of detergency and dimensional stability between wet cleaning and dry cleaning
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The washability, redeposition, fill power, and fabric damage of wet cleaning and dry cleaning solvents were measured to identify the optimal type of washing that would increase washability while maintaining dimensional stability. The soiled fabric is a polyester cotton blend and the types of soil were wine, blood, make-up and sebum with carbon black. Petroleum and silicone solvents were used in dry cleaning. Results from this study are as follows. First, detergency is significantly influenced by the type of washing and type of soil. Wet cleaning is superior to dry cleaning. Wet cleaning shows a strong washing performance against hydrophilic soils, whereas, dry cleaning is stronger against hydrophobic soils. Second, redeposition is significantly affected by the type of washing, fabrics, and soils. Redeposition occurred little on cotton during wet cleaning, but showed a high rate for nylon. However, when the two types of fabric were dry cleaned, redeposition occurred on both types. Third, the fill power of duck-down is very affected by the type of washing. Resilience is the best in wet cleaning; and in dry cleaning, petroleum solvents showed a higher resilience when as compared to silicone solvents. Last, the level of fabric damage to cotton fabrics is highly influenced by the type of washing. Wet cleaning damages cotton fabrics significantly more than dry cleaning. For dry cleaning, petroleum solvents damage these fabrics slightly more than silicone solvents. In conclusion, the type of soil must initially be identified to determine the optimal type of washing. Special caution is required when textiles with particulate soil and nylon are washed. When considering the resilience of duck-down clothing, wet cleaning is more appropriate than dry cleaning. Dry cleaning, especially when using silicone-based solvents, is more suitable than wet cleaning for maintaining the shape of clothing.
Abstract
The washability, redeposition, fill power, and fabric damage of wet cleaning and dry cleaning solvents were measured to identify the optimal type of washing that would increase washability while maintaining dimensional stability. The soiled fabric is a polyester cotton blend and the types of soil were wine, blood, make-up and sebum with carbon black. Petroleum and silicone solvents were used in dry cleaning. Results from this study are as follows. First, detergency is significantly influenced by the type of washing and type of soil. Wet cleaning is superior to dry cleaning. Wet cleaning shows a strong washing performance against hydrophilic soils, whereas, dry cleaning is stronger against hydrophobic soils. Second, redeposition is significantly affected by the type of washing, fabrics, and soils. Redeposition occurred little on cotton during wet cleaning, but showed a high rate for nylon. However, when the two types of fabric were dry cleaned, redeposition occurred on both types. Third, the fill power of duck-down is very affected by the type of washing. Resilience is the best in wet cleaning; and in dry cleaning, petroleum solvents showed a higher resilience when as compared to silicone solvents. Last, the level of fabric damage to cotton fabrics is highly influenced by the type of washing. Wet cleaning damages cotton fabrics significantly more than dry cleaning. For dry cleaning, petroleum solvents damage these fabrics slightly more than silicone solvents. In conclusion, the type of soil must initially be identified to determine the optimal type of washing. Special caution is required when textiles with particulate soil and nylon are washed. When considering the resilience of duck-down clothing, wet cleaning is more appropriate than dry cleaning. Dry cleaning, especially when using silicone-based solvents, is more suitable than wet cleaning for maintaining the shape of clothing.
참고문헌 (18)
- 김선영, "아웃도어 스포츠의류 충전재의 종류와 세탁에 따른 보온성 및 형태 변화", 석사, pp.2016
- 김성련, "세제와 세탁의 과학" (2007), 교문사
- 김성련, "피복재료학" (2009), 교문사
- 김영빈, "공기주입형 의복의 보온력 측정 및 다운재킷의 보온력과의 비교", 한국의류학회지, 39(1), pp.55~62 (2015), 한국의류학회
- 김옥경, "국내 스포츠웨어 패션화 경향에 따른 다운의류 생산기술", 섬유기술과 산업, 6(3, pp.4) (2002), 206~217
- 김천희, "친환경 실리콘계 드라이클리닝용제(Decamethylcyclopentasiloxane)에서 모직물의 세척성과 재오염성", 한국염색가공학회지, 24(2), pp.138~144 (2012), 한국염색가공학회[DOI]
- 김천희, "친환경 실리콘계 드라이클리닝 용제(Decamethylcyclopentasiloxane, D5)의 모직물 세척성 향상을 위한 드라이클리닝세제용 계면활성제 연구", 한국염색가공학회지, 26(3), pp.209~217 (2014), 한국염색가공학회
- 김천희, "실리콘계 용제(Decamethylcyclopentasiloxane, D5)와 실리콘계 계면활성제에 의한 면직물과 Polyester", Cotton(65, 한국생활과학회지, pp.2017, 26(2)[DOI]
- 노의경, "세탁조건에 따른 폴리에스터", 스판덱스 편성물의 형태안정성과 역학적 특성 변화, 2018, pp.20(1), 93~100[DOI]
- 손원교, "의복의 소재 및 형태가 보온력에 미치는 영향", 한국의류학회지, 23(8), pp.1098~1109 (1999)
- 이영주, "아웃도어 스포츠웨어 구매행동에 관한 질적 연구-기능성 인지수준과 추구 혜택을 중심으로-", 복식문화연구, 19(5), pp.1088~1101 (2011), 복식문화학회[DOI]
- 이용대, "등산상식사전" (2010), 해냄
- 최진영, "아웃도어 여성용 다운재킷 패턴연구", 석사, 의류학, pp.2010
- 최해운, "시판 의류제품에 관련된 소비자 불만에 관한 연구-YWCA 소비자 고발자료를 중심으로", 한국의류학회지, 17(4), pp.550~564 (1993)
- "다운 이불 품질비교시험 결과, 한국소비자원 2016년 기획시험" (2016), 한국소비자원[URL]
- "의류제품 소비자분쟁, 절반 이상이 사업자 책임, 한국소비자원 보도자료" (2018), 한국소비자원[URL]
- Imaizumi, A., "Fading characteristics of a disperse dye on cellulose triacetate, polyester and nylon under monochromatic light radiation", Coloration Technology, 122(2), pp.86~92 (2006)
- Yamanoto, N., "Detergency of oily soil from cotton by photo-catalytic action with titanium dioxide", Journal of Oleo Science, 51(9), pp.607~613 (2002)
