본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

디자이너, 부모와 어린이 사이의 의도 차이와 그 현상에 관한 연구 -어린이 놀이터를 중심으로-

A Study on the Difference in Intention between Designers, Parents and Children and its Phenomenon -focused on children's playgrounds-

조광수|소상과
한국기초조형학회 (Korean Society Of Basic Design & Art)|2024.02|기초조형학연구 (Journal of Basic Design & Art)|제25권 제1호|pp. 171-184|DOI 10.47294/KSBDA.25.1.12

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

어린이부모childrenparentsdesigner디자이너어린이 놀이터의도 차이children playgrounddifferences in intent
주제분류예술일반

초록

현재 어린이 놀이터에서 다른 집단의 의도 차이에 대한 관련 연구는 비교적 단일하며, 어린이 놀이터 디자이너와 부모, 어린이의 ‘의도’ 차이와 그 현상을 살펴보고 것이 필요하다. 본 연구의 목적은놀이터에 대한 디자이너, 부모, 어린이의 의도의 차이를 조사하고, 그 차이를 바탕으로 어린이 놀이터의 방향을 제시하고자 한다. 연구 방법 및 내용은 총 세 부분으로 진행했다. 첫째, 어린이 놀이터를 5개의 기능적 공간으로 나누고 각 공간을 정의한다. 문헌 연구와 현장 조사를 통해 어린이 놀이터를 중심으로 그 이면의 현상을 파악하고, 이를 바탕으로 개념을 제안하여 연구 모델을 구축했다. 연구 목적을 바탕으로 디자이너, 부모, 어린이의 의도를 추출하고 정리했다. 셋째, 선행 연구를 바탕으로 설문조사를 실시하고 설문 데이터를 디자이너, 부모와 어린이 의도 차이 분석과 의도 차이 현상 및 추세분석 부분으로 나누어 분석했다. 분석 결과, 어린이 놀이터에 대한 디자이너, 부모, 어린이의 의도 16개 항목 중 아홉 개 항목인 창의력, 도전, 지능, 학습, 성취감, 모험, 탐구욕, 독립, 경쟁에서 유의미한 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 그리고 9가지 의도를 분석하여 3가지 의미있는 현상을 찾았는데, 첫째, 디자이너의 디자인 ‘의도’가 부모보다 높고, 부모의 ‘의도’가 자녀의 ‘의도’보다높으며, 두 번째, 부모가 가장 높은 ‘의도’ 값을 가지고 있고 디자이너는 부모보다 ‘의도’ 값이 낮지만 자녀보다 경향을 보였다. 그룹의 ‘의도’ 값은 변곡 추세를 보인다. 세 번째, 부모가 가장 높은 ‘의도’ 값을 가지고 있고, 자녀는 부모보다 ‘의도’ 값이 낮지만 디자이너보다 높으며, 전체적으로 상승추세를 보인다.

Abstract

Currently, there is a relatively limited body of research on the intention differences among different groups in children's playgrounds. It is necessary to examine the differences in 'intentions' between playground designers, parents, and children, along with their associated phenomena. The purpose of this study is to investigate the differences in the intentions of designers, parents and children towards playgrounds and to propose directions for children's playgrounds based on the differences. The research method and content were conducted in three parts. Firstly, it categorizes the playground into 5 functional spaces and defines each space, proposing concepts and constructing a research model based on literature review and field surveys. Based on the research purpose, the intentions of designers, parents, and children were extracted and organized. Thirdly, based on prior studies, a survey is conducted, and the survey data is analyzed in terms of differences in intentions between designers, parents, children, as well as trends and phenomena related to intention differences. The analysis results show that differences among designers, parents, and children in nine out of sixteen intention items related to children's playgrounds, including creativity, challenge, intelligence, learning, achievement, adventure, curiosity, independence, and competition. Further analysis of the nine intentions identified three meaningful phenomena. Firstly, designers' design intentions are higher than parents, parents' intentions are higher than children's intentions. Secondly, parents have the highest intention values, and while designers' intentions are lower than parents, they show a trend higher than children. The group's intention values exhibit a turning trend. Third, parents have the highest intention values, children have lower intentions than parents but higher than designers, and overall, there is an increasing trend.

참고문헌 (35)

  1. Aminpour, F., "From the child's perspective : How the layout of outdoor school environments shapes conflict between children's self-directed play", Journal of Environmental Psychology, 79, pp.101727~ (2022)
  2. Bagot, K. L., "Perceived restorativeness of children's school playground environments : Nature, playground features and play period experiences", Journal of Environmental Psychology, 41, pp.1~9 (2015)
  3. Burke, J., "Just for the fun of it : Making playgrounds accessible to all children", World Leisure Journal, 55(1), pp.83~95 (2013)
  4. Czalczynska-Podolska, M., "The impact of playground spatial features on children's play and activity forms : An evaluation of contemporary playgrounds' play and social value", Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, pp.132~142 (2014)
  5. Dodd, H. F., "Children’s play and independent mobility in 2020 : results from the British children’s play survey", International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(8), pp.4334~ (2021)
  6. Drianda, R. P., "The safe and fun children's play spaces : Evidence from Tokyo, Japan, and Bandung, Indonesia", Journal of Urban Design, 20(4), pp.437~460 (2015)
  7. Giles, R. M., "Reading, writing, and running : Literacy learning on the playground", The Reading Teacher, 59(3), pp.283~285 (2005)
  8. Hinchion, S., "Fraught with frights or full of fun : perspectives of risky play among six-to-eight-year olds", European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 29(5), pp.696~714 (2021)
  9. Jansson, M., "Children's perspectives on public playgrounds in two Swedish communities", Children Youth and Environments, 18(2), pp.88~109 (2008)
  10. Jansson, M., "Attractive playgrounds : Some factors affecting user interest and visiting patterns", Landscape Research, 35(1), pp.63~81 (2010)
  11. Jelleyman, C., "A cross-sectional description of parental perceptions and practices related to risky play and independent mobility in children : The New Zealand state of play survey", International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(2), pp.262~ (2019)
  12. Jeong, K. T., "Children's play facilities according to the classification of amusement features", Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture, 46(1), pp.29~37 (2018)
  13. Kim, Y. S, "An analysis of the children's creative behavior on play facilities in sangsang(imaginative) children park, Seoul city", doctor, pp.2013
  14. Lai, N. K., "The impact of play on child development-a literature review", European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 26(5), pp.625~643 (2018)
  15. Lee, J. Y, "A study on types and evaluation of eco-friendly children’s playground", master, pp.2017
  16. Lerstrup, I., "Affordances of outdoor settings for children in preschool : Revisiting heft’s functional taxonomy", Landscape Research, 42(1), pp.47~62 (2017)
  17. Little, H., "Early childhood teachers' beliefs about children’s risky play in Australia and Norway", Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 13(4), pp.300~316 (2012)
  18. Loebach, J., "Playing in ‘The Backyard’ : Environmental features and conditions of a natural playspace which support diverse outdoor play activities among younger children", International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(19), pp.12661~ (2022)
  19. Luchs, A., "A comparative study of active play on differently designed playgrounds", Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning, 13(3), pp.206~222 (2013)
  20. Norðdahl, K., "Children’s views and preferences regarding their outdoor environment", Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning, 15(2), pp.152~167 (2015)
  21. McFarland, L., "Parents’ and early childhood educators’ attitudes and practices in relation to children’s outdoor risky play", Early Childhood Education Journal, 46, pp.159~168 (2018)
  22. Merve, Ü., "The place and importance of playgrounds in child development", Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 10(2), pp.95~110 (2009)
  23. Moore, A., "Designing for inclusion in public playgrounds : a scoping review of definitions, and utilization of universal design", Disa-bility and Rehabilitation : Assistive Technology, 18(8), pp.1453~1465 (2023)
  24. Moore, T. G., "Early childhood development and the social determinants of health inequities", Health Promotion International, 30(2), pp.ii102~ii115 (2015)
  25. Qiao, S., "Organizing play spaces for children in China’s megalopolises : Preferences and requirements of parents", Early Child Development and Care, 191(10), pp.1590~1601 (2021)
  26. Refshauge, A. D., "Adults’ motivation for bringing their children to park playgrounds", Urban forestry & Urban Greening, 11(4), pp.396~405 (2012)
  27. Reimers, A. K., "Physical activity and outdoor play of children in public playgrounds—do gender and social environment matter?", International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(7), pp.1356~ (2018)
  28. Shi, Y., "Explore children's outdoor play spaces of community areas in high-density cities in China : wuhan as an example", Procedia Engineering, 198, pp.654~682 (2017)
  29. Sluss, D. J., "Supporting play in early childhood : Environment, curriculum, assessment" (2018), Cengage Learning
  30. Snow, D., "Girls’perspectives on the ideal school playground experience : An exploratory study of four Australian primary schools", Children's Geographies, 17(2), pp.148~161 (2019)
  31. Spilker, A., "Outdoor play in preschool children: parent attitudes and loose part play in urban settings", doctor, pp.2022
  32. Staiano, A. E., "Exergames for physical education courses : Physical, social, and cognitive benefits", Child Development Perspectives, 5(2), pp.93~98 (2011)
  33. Tang, L., "Design of natural children's recreational spaces and facilities in urban neighborhood parks", Journal of Landscape Research, 11(3), pp.1~4 (2019)
  34. Veitch, J., "Where do children usually play? A qualitative study of parents’ perceptions of influences on children's active free-play", Health & Place, 12(4), pp.383~393 (2006)
  35. Woolley, H., "How to grow a playspace: Development and design", Children, Youth and Environments, 28(2), pp.191~193 (2018)

관련 논문AI추천

어린이 놀이터 녹지공간에서 부모의 의도와 어린이의 의도에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구소상과, 조광수한국기초조형학회 · 기초조형학연구2024 · 제25권 제3호어린이의 놀이 특징을 적용한 실외 놀이터에 관한 연구신상미, 이정교한국공간디자인학회 · 한국공간디자인학회 논문집2014 · 제9권 제1호연령대별 아동친화 친환경 놀이터 개발을 위한 사용자 선호도 조사김자경한국가구학회 · 한국가구학회지2024 · 제35권 제1호무장애 놀이공간 계획을 위한 설치유형별 놀이공간 실태분석강병근, 김상운, 김은경, 박광재, 성기창, 윤영삼, 이기정한국의료복지건축학회 · 의료·복지 건축2009 · 제15권 제4호해외 실외 놀이터 놀이기구 제품 현황 및 디자인 유형에 관한 연구김자경한국가구학회 · 한국가구학회지2023 · 제34권 제1호장애·비장애 아동 보호자의 통합놀이터 이용 경험과 활성화 요구최효주, 한경근한국지체·중복·건강장애교육학회 · 지체.중복.건강장애연구2025 · 제68권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (32건)

오프라인 사용자 경험 향상을 위한 대형마트 모바일 애플리케이션 서비스디자인 제안 - 위치기반 서 비스를 중심으로고수민, 김은영pp. 1-18The Influence of Dynamic Principles of Motion Graphics on User’Visual Search Efficiency관문, 조동민pp. 19-30일상 속 판타지를 구현하는 디자인 창작 연구권정현, 장성연pp. 31-41사용자 리서치를 기반으로 한 토너패드 용기 구조 디자인 연구김가은, 이길옥pp. 43-56시각예술인의 시각예술웹콘텐츠플랫폼 수용에 대한 기술수용모델 기반 연구김선곤pp. 57-76
원문 보기