본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

산부인과 의료사고배상의 합리적 방안-유형별 구조분석을 중심하여-

A Rational Scheme for Medical Malpractice Compensation in OBGYN -Focusing on a Structural Analysis by Types-

2

조회

0

다운로드

9

인용

0

참고문헌

주제분류법학

초록

Abstract

Although fetal deaths in labor are most frequently adverse events in local obstetric clinic in Korea, a lack of attention has been paid to build guidance and compensation system for fetal death. This study, hence, was conducted to assess the rates of fetal death in labor and the average amounts of compensation for such damage. A case-record review was conducted. Data from 3,147 litigation records was collected retrospectively from the Council of Arbitration of the Korean Medical Association (1991-2001) for 11 years period. These case-records were reviewed by RNs and classified into characteristics of medical practice and injury outcome. A total number of cases in labor were 581 cases: vaginal delivery 310 cases (53.4%) and caesarean section 271 cases (46.6%). Then, this study included 269 cases with fetal death in labor from 1991 to 2001. The average amount of compensation for fetal death was $13,480 won, less than that of maternal death ($53,250) and both of deaths ($57,345). Fetal death cases were presented in 26.2% of obstetric cases, but the scope of the amounts of compensation was vary large and couldn't be standardized to estimate. In conclusion, the normative debate should be necessary to build a rational guide to compensation for damage. Objective indicators, however, might be considered to evaluate the amounts of compensation for fetal death. Furthermore, fixed amounts of compensation can be applied to fetal death in labor. This study is a useful data for standardization of malpractice insurance coverage for fetal death in Korea

참고문헌 (19)

  1. "의료사고방지를 위한 가이드라인. 동경경찰병원 의료사고방지위원회 편. 1994."
  2. "우리나라 의료과오 예방을 위한 효과적 대처방안. 2000." (2000)
  3. "의료사고유형의 구조적 분석을 통한 의료사고예방의 전략적 대안. 2003." (2003)
  4. "Obstetrics and Malpractice-Evidence on the Performance of a Selective No-Fault System" (1991)
  5. "The future of clinical negligence litigation", pp.328~ (2004)
  6. "Vaginal Birth After Cesarean" (2001)
  7. "Caroline Richmond. Cost of malpractice protection on rise in UK" (1997)
  8. "Placental Evidence in Malpractice Litigation", pp.115~ (1991)
  9. "Medicine and the Law No Claim in English Law for Wrongful Birth", pp.20~ (1982)
  10. "An alternative to the obstetrical malpractice lottery Journal of Health Politics", (-fault cerebral palsy insurance) (1989)
  11. "No-fault compensation for medical injury"
  12. "Hindsight bias in medicolegal expert reports", pp.176~ (2002)
  13. "New prenatal screening procedures raise spectre of more" (1995)
  14. "How health care organizations deal with major failures" (2004)
  15. "NEWS. Aussie MDs' malpractice coverage in turmoil. CMAJ", 167(1) (2002)
  16. "NEWS. Lawyers trying to stop malpractice merry-go-round. CMAJ", 167(7) (2002)
  17. "Nouvelles. Malpractice fee hikes mean some US MDs can't afford to work. JAMC", 168(4) (2003)
  18. "Perinatal Medical Negligence Closed Claims from the St. Paul Company 1980-1982 Journal of Reproductive Medicine" (1988)
  19. Strunk AL, "MEDICOLEGAL CONSIDERATIONS IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF BREAST CANCER OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA" (2002)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)