Exploring small mammal monitoring in South Korea: The debut of the Mostela
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background: Traditional wildlife monitoring has often relied on invasive techniques posing risks to species and demanding substantial resources. To address this, camera traps emerged as non-invasive alternatives, albeit primarily tailored for larger mammals, posing limitations for small mammal research. Thus, the Mostela, an innovative tool designed to overcome these challenges, was introduced to monitor small mammals in South Korea. Results: The Mostela was deployed at two study sites in South Korea, yielding compelling evidence of its efficiency in capturing small mammal species. By analyzing the collected data, we calculated the relative abundance of each species and elucidated their activity patterns. Conclusions: In summary, the Mostela system demonstrates substantial potential for advancing small mammal monitoring, offering valuable insights into diversity, community dynamics, activity patterns, and habitat preferences. Its application extends to the detection of endangered and rare species, further contributing to wildlife conservation efforts in South Korea. Consequently, the Mostela system stands as a valuable addition to the toolkit of conservationists and researchers, fostering ethical and non-invasive research practices while advancing our understanding of small mammal populations and ecosystems.
Abstract
Background: Traditional wildlife monitoring has often relied on invasive techniques posing risks to species and demanding substantial resources. To address this, camera traps emerged as non-invasive alternatives, albeit primarily tailored for larger mammals, posing limitations for small mammal research. Thus, the Mostela, an innovative tool designed to overcome these challenges, was introduced to monitor small mammals in South Korea. Results: The Mostela was deployed at two study sites in South Korea, yielding compelling evidence of its efficiency in capturing small mammal species. By analyzing the collected data, we calculated the relative abundance of each species and elucidated their activity patterns. Conclusions: In summary, the Mostela system demonstrates substantial potential for advancing small mammal monitoring, offering valuable insights into diversity, community dynamics, activity patterns, and habitat preferences. Its application extends to the detection of endangered and rare species, further contributing to wildlife conservation efforts in South Korea. Consequently, the Mostela system stands as a valuable addition to the toolkit of conservationists and researchers, fostering ethical and non-invasive research practices while advancing our understanding of small mammal populations and ecosystems.
참고문헌 (40)
- Avenant NL, "Correlating rodent community structure with ecological integrity, Tussen-die-Riviere Nature Reserve, Free State province, South Africa", Integr Zool, 2(4), pp.212~219 (2007)[DOI]
- Boone SR, "Seed predation and dispersal by small mammals in a landscape of fear: effects of personality, predation risk and land-use change", Oikos, 2022(2) (2022)[DOI]
- Breed D, "Conserving wildlife in a changing world: understanding capture myopathy-a malignant outcome of stress during capture and translocation", Conserv Physiol, 7(1), pp.coz027~ (2019)[DOI]
- Burger JR, "The influence of trap type on evaluating population structure of the semifossorial and social rodent Octodon degus", Acta Theriol, 54(4), pp.311~320 (2009)[DOI]
- Burton AC, "Wildlife camera trapping : a review and recommendations for linking surveys to ecological processes", J Appl Ecol, 52(3), pp.675~685 (2015)[DOI]
- Carbone C, "The use of photographic rates to estimate densities of tigers and other cryptic mammals", Anim Conserv, 4, pp.75~79 (2001)[DOI]
- Cepeda-Duque J, "Expanding the frontiers of camera-trapping in Colombia: application of the “Mostela” system to gain knowledge on small non-volant mammals from an Andean cloud forest", Mammalia, 87(5), pp.419~428 (2023)[DOI]
- Chen C, "Global camera trap synthesis highlights the importance of protected areas in maintaining mammal diversity", Conserv Lett, 15(1), pp.e12865~ (2022)[DOI]
- Croose E, "Assessing the detectability of the Irish stoat Mustela erminea hibernica using two camera trap-based survey methods", Mamm Res, 67(1), pp.1~8 (2022)[DOI]
- Delisle ZJ, "Next-generation camera trapping : systematic review of historic trends suggests keys to expanded research applications in ecology and conservation", Front Ecol Evol, 9, pp.617996~ (2021)[DOI]
- 2.0.CO;2,
- Gompper ME, "A comparison of noninvasive techniques to survey carnivore communities in northeastern North America", Wildl Soc Bull, 34(4), pp.1142~1151 (2006)
- Gracanin A, "The use of selfie camera traps to estimate home range and movement patterns of small mammals in a fragmented landscape", Animals(Basel), 12(7), pp.912~ (2022)[DOI]
- Gracanin A, "Estimating the density of small mammals using the selfie trap is an effective camera trapping method", Mamm Res, 67(4), pp.467~482 (2022)[DOI]
- Gruber T, "An ethical assessment of the use of old and new methods to study sociality in wild animals", Methods Ecol Evol, 14(8), pp.1842~1851 (2023)[DOI]
- Hobbs MT, "An improved camera trap for amphibians, reptiles, small mammals, and large invertebrates", PLoS One, 12(10), pp.e0185026~ (2017)[DOI]
- Kolowski JM, "Camera trap placement and the potential for bias due to trails and other features", PLoS One, 12(10), pp.e0186679~ (2017)[DOI]
- Lidicker WZ, "Small, warm, and fuzzy", BioScience, 61(2), pp.155~157 (2011)[DOI]
- Littlewood NA, "Use of a novel camera trapping approach to measure small mammal responses to peatland restoration", Eur J Wildl Res, 67(1), pp.12~ (2021)[DOI]
- Magurran AE, "Measuring biological diversity", Curr Biol, 31(19), pp.R1174~R1177 (2021)[DOI]
- Martin SA, "Set AHDriFT : applying game cameras to drift fences for surveying herpetofauna and small mammals", Wildl Soc Bull, 41(4), pp.804~809 (2017)[DOI]
- MCCleery RA, "A novel method for camera-trapping small mammals", Wildl Soc Bull, 38(4), pp.887~891 (2014)[DOI]
- Meek PD, "Recommended guiding principles for reporting on camera trapping research", Biodivers Conserv, 23(9), pp.2321~2343 (2014)[DOI]
- Moore JF, "The potential and practice of arboreal camera trapping", Methods Ecol Evol, 12(10), pp.1768~1779 (2021)[DOI]
- Mos J, "The Mostela : an adjusted camera trapping device as a promising non-invasive tool to study and monitor small mustelids", Mamm Res, 65(4), pp.843~853 (2020)[DOI]
- Naing H, "Population density estimates and conservation concern for clouded leopards Neofelis nebulosa, marbled cats Pardofelis marmorata and tigers Panthera tigris in Htamanthi Wildlife Sanctuary, Sagaing, Myanmar", Oryx, 53(4), pp.654~662 (2019)[DOI]
- Nichols JD, "Monitoring for conservation", Trends Ecol Evol, 21(12), pp.668~673 (2006)[DOI]
- Nottingham CM, "Relative efficacy of chew card and camera trap indices for use in hedgehog and rat monitoring", N Z J Zool, 48(1), pp.32~46 (2021)[DOI]
- O’Farrell MJ, "Use of a mesh live trap for small mammals : are results from Sherman live traps deceptive?", J Mammal, 75(3), pp.692~699 (1994)[DOI]
- Oliver RY, "Camera trapping expands the view into global biodiversity and its change", Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 378(1881), pp.20220232~ (2023)[DOI]
- Palencia P, "Towards a best-practices guide for camera trapping : assessing differences among camera trap models and settings under field conditions", J Zool, 316(3), pp.197~208 (2022)[DOI]
- 박희복, "Where to spot: individual identification of leopard cats (Prionailurus bengalensis euptilurus) in South Korea", Journal of Ecology and Environment, 43(4), pp.385~389 (2019), 한국생태학회[DOI]
- Peral C, "The inappropriate use of time-to-independence biases estimates of activity patterns of free-ranging mammals derived from camera traps", Ecol Evol, 12(10), pp.e9408~ (2022)[DOI]
- Rasphone A, "Density trends of wild felids in northern Laos", Biodivers Conserv, 30(6), pp.1881~1897 (2021)[DOI]
- Ridout MS, "Estimating overlap of daily activity patterns from camera trap data", J Agric Biol Environ Stat, 14(3), pp.322~337 (2009)[DOI]
- Rowcliffe JM, "Quantifying levels of animal activity using camera trap data", Methods Ecol Evol, 5(11), pp.1170~1179 (2014)[DOI]
- Soulsbury CD, "The welfare and ethics of research involving wild animals : a primer", Methods Ecol Evol, 11(10), pp.1164~1181 (2020)[DOI]
- Van der Weyde LK, "Multi-species occupancy modelling of a carnivore guild in wildlife management areas in the Kalahari", Biol Conserv, 220, pp.21~28 (2018)[DOI]
- 2.0.CO;2,
- Yoccoz NG, "Monitoring of biological diversity in space and time", Trends Ecol Evol, 16(8), pp.446~453 (2001)[DOI]