본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

연명치료 중단 관련 법ㆍ정책 방향

Direction of the law and policy involved in futile medical treatment

0

조회

0

다운로드

10

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Boramae Hospital case in 1997 raised a lot of disputes in regard to the stopping treatment, and it brought a lot of problems such as raising a defensive treatment prevalent, limiting the choices of patients and families, deepening conflicts between guardians and medical staffs, increasing social cost, and conflicting between systems. However, Korea does not have any legal or systematical mechanism to resolve those problems, thusthese problems have been more accelerated. These reverse functions that were caused by stopping prolonging life seem to disregard an ethnic side, these problems in regard to withdrawing medically futile treatments were examined by means of applying four principles of medical ethnics to prepare for the systematical direction in terms of law and policy. Legal and systematical innovation was needed to improve the right to decide by patients and their family, to substantiate health insurance, to supplement undeveloped medical field, to secure balance of expenditure for the finance of health insurance, and to justify withdrawing medically futile treatments. It is necessary to carry out withdrawing medically futile treatments even before the related law is passed from the point of medical organization's view. Medical organization shall prepare a guideline and a performing plan with respect to writing an agreement form, standard of decision making and procedure, an organizational committee for withdrawing medically futile treatments and medical staff meeting. In addition, in order for voluntary participation within the medical organization, public relations and education should be maintained simultaneously. It is also necessary for the government should state basic regulations by means of organizing one chapter binding existing relevant laws such as MEDICAL SERVICE ACT and ACT ON BIOETHICS AND SAFETY. However, it is hard to comprehend all patients subject to withdrawing medically futile treatments due to the particularity and limitation of patients subject to the existing law. Therefore, preparing an independent law, so-called Act on withdrawing medically futile treatments, can be considered because there are other legislation cases in foreign countries and it can be easier when connecting hospices as a subtitling plan. Moreover, in order for successful try-out for withdrawing medically futile treatments, it should be essential not only education and public relations from the government, but also the fund to reduce an economical burden when continuing treatments.

Abstract

Boramae Hospital case in 1997 raised a lot of disputes in regard to the stopping treatment, and it brought a lot of problems such as raising a defensive treatment prevalent, limiting the choices of patients and families, deepening conflicts between guardians and medical staffs, increasing social cost, and conflicting between systems. However, Korea does not have any legal or systematical mechanism to resolve those problems, thusthese problems have been more accelerated. These reverse functions that were caused by stopping prolonging life seem to disregard an ethnic side, these problems in regard to withdrawing medically futile treatments were examined by means of applying four principles of medical ethnics to prepare for the systematical direction in terms of law and policy. Legal and systematical innovation was needed to improve the right to decide by patients and their family, to substantiate health insurance, to supplement undeveloped medical field, to secure balance of expenditure for the finance of health insurance, and to justify withdrawing medically futile treatments. It is necessary to carry out withdrawing medically futile treatments even before the related law is passed from the point of medical organization's view. Medical organization shall prepare a guideline and a performing plan with respect to writing an agreement form, standard of decision making and procedure, an organizational committee for withdrawing medically futile treatments and medical staff meeting. In addition, in order for voluntary participation within the medical organization, public relations and education should be maintained simultaneously. It is also necessary for the government should state basic regulations by means of organizing one chapter binding existing relevant laws such as MEDICAL SERVICE ACT and ACT ON BIOETHICS AND SAFETY. However, it is hard to comprehend all patients subject to withdrawing medically futile treatments due to the particularity and limitation of patients subject to the existing law. Therefore, preparing an independent law, so-called Act on withdrawing medically futile treatments, can be considered because there are other legislation cases in foreign countries and it can be easier when connecting hospices as a subtitling plan. Moreover, in order for successful try-out for withdrawing medically futile treatments, it should be essential not only education and public relations from the government, but also the fund to reduce an economical burden when continuing treatments.

참고문헌 (43)

  1. 기윤실 부설 기독교윤리연구소, "소극적 안락사 무엇이 문제인가?" (2007), 예영커뮤니케이션
  2. 김건열, "존엄사-회복가능성이 없는 환자에 대한 연명치료 중단" (2005), 최신의학사
  3. 김재봉, "치료중단과 소극적 안락사", 형사법연구 (1999)
  4. 김정우, "서유럽 안락사 실태와 윤리적 전망. 대구카톨릭대부설카톨릭사상연구소. 카톨릭사상", 29~ (2003)
  5. 김중호, "말기 환자에 대한 연명치료 유보의 윤리", 한국생명윤리학회 생명윤리, 4(1) (2003)
  6. 김중호, "병원윤리위원회 조직과 기능 및 활성화 방안 연구", 한국의료윤리교육학회지, 7(1) (2004)
  7. 문국진, "연명적 치료중단과 의학적 측면", 대한법의학회지, 12(2) (1988)
  8. 박연옥, "말기환자의 연명치료 중단의 생명윤리적 고찰", 간호학탐구, 13(1) (2004)
  9. 박영주, "소극적 안락사의 허용여부에 대한 소고", 저스티스, 35(1) (2002)
  10. 박상열, "미국 오리건 주의 존엄사법과 죽을 권리", 법조, 500 (1998), 법조협회
  11. 손명세, "연명치료 관련 의사결정의 정당한 절차와 기준에 대한 지침 개발" (2005), 의료법윤리학연구소
  12. 손명세, "우리 사회의 안락사와 존엄사 그리고 연명치료 중단", 생명의 신학, 1 (2003), 연세대 신과대학 한국기독교문화연구소
  13. 손명세, "안락사, 존엄사, 무의미한 치료중단의 구분" (2002), 대한의학회
  14. 손명세, "의료문제에 대한 윤리와 법의 통합적 접근: 의료법윤리학 서설" (2002), 동림사
  15. 손명세, "안락사 기준에 관한 국제비교 연구", 한국의료윤리교육학회지, 3(1) (2000)
  16. 손명세, "호스피스완화의료의 법제화 방안", 국립암센터 심포지엄 2005 -호스피스 완화의료 제도화 방안- 자료집 (2005)
  17. 신현호, "삶과 죽음 권리인가 의무인가?" (2006), 육법사
  18. 신현호, "호스피스ㆍ완화의료에 관한 형법적 연구", 박사, pp.2005
  19. 엄영란, "병원윤리위원회 역할의 활성화 방안 탐색연구", 의료.윤리.교육, 6(1)통권 : 9 (2003)
  20. 오대규, "말기암관리의 현황 및 방향", 호스피스-완화의료 심포지엄 (2001)
  21. 우재명, "안락사와 연명치료중단의 윤리", 신학과 철학, (7) (2005)
  22. 유종호, "안락사에 대한 태도 분석-전공의와 사법연수생의 비교", 석사, pp.2004
  23. 유호종, "연명치료중단의 정당성의 근거와 조건", 의료윤리교육 (2002), 한국의료윤리교육학회
  24. 윤영호, "호스피스완화의료제도화 현황 및 발전과제", 국립암센터 심포지엄 2005 -호스피스 완화의료 제도화 방안- 자료집 (2005)
  25. 이상돈, "연명치료 중단의 정책적 대토론회-보라매병원 사건을 중심으로" (2004), 대한의사협회
  26. 이상돈, "치료중단과 형사책임" (2003), 법문사
  27. 이상욱, "호스피스 수가개발-호스피스 이용 현황과 비용을 중심으로" (2004), 관동대, 보건복지부
  28. 전효숙, "고위험신생아 치료중단에 대한 윤리적인 의사결정에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.2001
  29. 한국보건사회연구원, "회복불가능환자의 연명치료 중단에 관한 공청회" (2002), 한국보건사회연구원
  30. 한국의료법학회, "연명치료중단의 법, 정책적 대토론회-보라매병원 사건을 중심으로", 자료집 (2002)
  31. 황상익, "가망없는 환자의 치료중단과 의료윤리", 대한의사협회지, 41(7) (1998)
  32. "국내 첫 ‘연명치료 중단’ 가처분 신청, 의협신문, 2008. 05. 09", ~
  33. "‘존엄사 소송’ 새 국면, “치료법 선책권한 달라”, 메디컬 투데이", 뉴시스, 2008. 6. 19
  34. "뉴스라이프, 단국대학교 의과대학 의료윤리학교실 정유석 교수, 안락사 논쟁, 가릴 건 가려야한다, , 2007.06. 29", ~
  35. "법률신문, 미국 헌법상 보장되는 ‘존엄사, 2005. 04. 08", ~
  36. David F.K, "Medical care at the end of life" (2006), Georgetown University Press
  37. Daniel Callahan, "What kind of life" (1990), Simon & Schuster Inc
  38. Gavin W.H, "Living wills and other advance directives: reasons for execution and preferences fortheir use, Chicago, Illinois", ~ (2004)
  39. Hazel Biggs, "Euthanasia-Death with dignity and the law" (2001), Heart publishing
  40. Lawrence P.U, "The patient self-determination act-meeting the challenges in patient care" (1999), Georgetown University Press
  41. Robert H.B, "End-of-Life decision making" (2005), MIT press
  42. Thomas F.B, "Ethics of emerging technologies" (2006), John Wiley & Sons
  43. [URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)