中國學界의‘唐征高句麗論’과 歷史認識의 諸問題

Abstract

This article is critical examination about Chinese academia nderstands which Koguryeo had responsibility with the reason of war broke out between‘Tang dynasty’ and‘ Koguryeo dynasty’. They understand base on research view of conquest‘ Make it right by give punish to guilty sin act’theory, they think cause of the war is in Koguryeo, and so military expedition of Tang was unavoidable to Koguryeo’s wrong act. They considered Tang had a responsibility to set the right path to Koguryeo for Koguryeo’s wrong act as a suzerain state. But base on conquest theory’s view, proposition is not valid about premise basis, that rather rational or not, so base on conquest theory, their history explanation is not acceptable. So that make basic premise is wrong that viewpoint of research depends on, and it make unavoidable that description is overtaxed. Related researcher tries to avoid their disadvantage logical development data or depreciate of the meaning of it, so that make reason of the problem. If the view of this conquest theory is wrong, we could just throw the old theory away and find the new theory of view, so it can develop of prevention from history fact distortion. But it seems not easy, related researcher, as they are a Chinese, they protect position of Tangs people, so they’ve been research for their own historical profit. They did not make the conquest theory for comfort to researching, but they were used it for set position to Tang side and treat about Tang and Koguryeo’s war. That’s why sided researchers researches are negative about understanding of Koguryeo. They do not think to set on Koguryeo side. The unfairly negative angle set that Koguryeo’s threaten that lead to develop reason of two dynasties war, it show like it because they even think their profit research and protecting their Tang’s position is helping history develop. Because of that, they think the side of aggressive foreign policy shows a dark side of the civilization. So this appeals what is the problem and where this research heading to and where the problem comes from through this argumentative comment. At this point, researcher could set the view fairly between Tang and Koguryeo. And so on, watch carefully how the expandable Tang’s foreign policy effect on international situation by the objective point of view.