본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

An Analysis of the Use of Cohesive and Written Discourse Features by Korean EFL Learners

2

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

This paper investigated the use of cohesive devices and written discourse features in summary composed by university- level Korean EFL learners with different reading comprehension ability. Two groups (N=58) of Korean EFL learners at a university in Kyeonggido, Korea, participated in the study. To measure the participants’ general reading ability, reading comprehension test was administered. Two general categories, cohesive devices and written discourse features, were also investigated to measure linguistic features the participants used in their writing. This study replicated a basic design used in Kang’s (2005) study that examines narrative essays of Korean EFL learners. The results suggest that reading proficiency significantly affects collocation (a lexical cohesion). Of particular interest were the findings that the more proficient readers failed to produce significant differences in other cohesive devices and written discourse features. This seems to suggest that regardless of the different levels of reading comprehension ability, the Korean university EFL learners showed restricted choice of syntactic and lexical features by heavily depending on specific categories of cohesive devices and academic writing discourse. Implications of these findings are discussed with a particular focus on pedagogical goals regarding teaching and learning of English writing for Korean university EFL learners.

Abstract

This paper investigated the use of cohesive devices and written discourse features in summary composed by university- level Korean EFL learners with different reading comprehension ability. Two groups (N=58) of Korean EFL learners at a university in Kyeonggido, Korea, participated in the study. To measure the participants’ general reading ability, reading comprehension test was administered. Two general categories, cohesive devices and written discourse features, were also investigated to measure linguistic features the participants used in their writing. This study replicated a basic design used in Kang’s (2005) study that examines narrative essays of Korean EFL learners. The results suggest that reading proficiency significantly affects collocation (a lexical cohesion). Of particular interest were the findings that the more proficient readers failed to produce significant differences in other cohesive devices and written discourse features. This seems to suggest that regardless of the different levels of reading comprehension ability, the Korean university EFL learners showed restricted choice of syntactic and lexical features by heavily depending on specific categories of cohesive devices and academic writing discourse. Implications of these findings are discussed with a particular focus on pedagogical goals regarding teaching and learning of English writing for Korean university EFL learners.

참고문헌 (57)

  1. Al-Jarf, R., "Processing of cohesive ties by EFL Arab college students", Foreign Language Annals, 32(2), pp.141~151 (2001)
  2. Al-zahrani, M. S., "Knowledge of English lexical collocations among male Saudi college students majoring in English at a Saudi university", 박사, pp.1998
  3. Bardovi-Harlig, K., "A narrative perspective on the development of the tense", aspect system in second language acquisition, 1995, pp.17(2), 263~91
  4. Benson, M., "Lexicographic description of English" (1986), John Benjamins
  5. Biber, D., "Spoken and written textual dimensions in English: Resolving the contradictory findings", Language, 62, pp.384~414 (1986)
  6. Biber, D., "Variation across speech and writing" (1988), Cambridge University Press
  7. Biesenbach-Lucas, S., "A comparative genre analysis: The research article and its popularization", 박사, pp.1994
  8. Biesenbach-Lucas, S., "E-mail and Word-processing in the ESL Classroom: How the Medium Affects the Message", Language Learning and Technology, 5(1), pp.135~165 (2001)
  9. Brown, A. L., "Macrorules for summarizing texts: The development of expertise", Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22(1), pp.1~14 (1983)
  10. Chafe, W., "Integration and involvement in speaking, writing, and oral literature, in: Spoken and written language: Exploring orality and literacy", pp.3554~ (1982), Ablex
  11. Chafe, W., "Discourse, consciousness, and time" (1994), University of Chicago Press
  12. Connor, U., "study of cohesion and coherence in English as a second language students’ writing", Papers in Linguistics: International Journal of Human Communication, 17(3), pp.301~316 (1984)
  13. Connor, U., "Contrastive rhetoric: Cross-cultural aspects of second language writing" (1996), Cambridge University Press
  14. Cox, B., "Children’s knowledge of organization, cohesion and voice in written exposition", Research in the Teaching of English, 25(2), pp.179~218 (1991)
  15. Crowhurst, M., "Interrelationships between reading and writing persuasive discourse", Research in the Teaching of English, 25, pp.314~338 (1991)
  16. Cumming, A., "Writing expertise and second language proficiency", Language Learning, 39(1), pp.81~141 (1989)
  17. English, A. K., "Northstar" (1998), Longman
  18. Ferris, D., "Lexical and syntactic features of ESL writing by students at different levels of L2 proficiency", TESOL Quarterly, 28(2), pp.414~421 (1994)
  19. Gitsaki, C., "Second language lexical acquisition: A study of the development of collocational knowledge" (1999), International Scholars Publications
  20. Guindon, R., "Grammatical and ungrammatical structures in user-adviser dialogues: Evidence for sufficiency of restricted languages in natural language interfaces to advisory systems", Proc. of the Annual Meeting of the ACL, pp.41~44 (1987)
  21. Halliday, M. A. K., "Cohesion in English" (1976), Longman
  22. Hinkel, E., "Indirectness in L1 and L2 academic writing", Journal of Pragmatics, 27, pp.361386~ (1997)
  23. Hinkel, E., "Simplicity without elegance: Features of sentences in L1 and L2 academic texts", TESOL Quarterly, 37(2), pp.275~301 (2003)
  24. Hsu, J. Y., "Lexical collocations and their impact on the online writing of Taiwanese college English majors and non-English maj", Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 4(2), pp.192~209 (2007)
  25. Jimnez Cataln, R., "Lexical cohesion in English L2 students’ composition, in: Teaching and learning the English language from a discourse perspective", pp.73~90 (2005), Universitat
  26. Kang, J. Y., "Written narratives as an index of L2 competence in Korean EFL learners", Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(4), pp.259~279 (2005)
  27. Kennedy, M. L., "The composing process of college students writing from sources", Written Communication, 2(4), pp.434~456 (1985)
  28. Kim, J. W., "Linguistic, rhetorical, and strategic aspects of Korean students’ persuasive writing in English", 박사, pp.1995
  29. Koya, T., "What is the reality of collocation use by native speakers of English?", Dialogue, 5, pp.118~ (2006)
  30. Krashen, S., "Writing: Research, theory, and applications" (1984), Pergamon Press Ltd.
  31. Leki, I., "Academic writing: Exploring processes and strategies" (1998), Cambridge University Press
  32. Lien, H. Y., "The effects of collocation instruction on the reading comprehension of Taiwanese college students", 박사, pp.2003
  33. McCarthy, M., "It, this, and that, in: Advances in written text analysis", pp.266~276 (1994), Routledge
  34. McCarthy, M., "English Collocations in Use" (2005), Cambridge University Press
  35. Meeks, K., "Is grammar a dirty word?", College ESL, 4(2), pp.39~42 (1994)
  36. Meisuo, Z., "Cohesive features in the expository writing of undergraduates in two", RELC Journal, 31(1), pp.61~95 (2000), Chinese Universities
  37. Moehkardi, R. R. D., "Grammatical and lexical English collocations: Some possible problems to Indonesian learners of English", Humaniora, 14(1), pp.53~62 (2002)
  38. Moon, R., "Introducing concepts, in: Written discourse (pp. 1-9)", pp.1~9 (2000), School of English Centre for English Language Studies
  39. Nation, I. S. P., "Learning vocabulary in another language" (2001), Cambridge University Press
  40. Norment, N., "Contrastive analyses of cohesive devices in Chinese and Chinese ESL in narrative and expository written texts", Chinese Language Teaching Association Journal, 29(1), pp.49~81 (1994)
  41. Ostler, S., "English in parallels: A comparison of English and Arabic prose, in: Writing across languages: Analysis of L2 text", pp.169~183 (1987), Addison-Wesley
  42. reader visibility in EFL written discourse, in: Learner English on computer, "Writer", pp.1998, Petch-Typson, S.
  43. Pienemann, M., "Learnability and syllabus construction, in: Modelling and Assessing Second Language Development", pp.23~77 (1985), Multilingual Matters
  44. Read, J., "Assessing vocabulary" (2000), Cambridge University Press
  45. Reid, J., "A computer text analysis of four cohesion devices in English discourse by native and nonnative writers", Journal of Second Language Writing, 1(2), pp.79107~ (1992)
  46. Reid, J., "Teaching ESL writing", pp.1993, Regents
  47. Scarcella, R. C., "Cohesion in the writing development of native and nonnative English speakers", 박사, pp.1984
  48. Schleppegrell, M. J., "Linguistic features of the language of schooling", Linguistics and Education, 12, pp.431459~ (2001)
  49. Silva, T., "Second language composition instruction: Developments, issues and directions in ESL, in: Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom", pp.11~23 (1990), Cambridge University Press
  50. Silva, T., "Toward an understanding of the distinct nature of L2 writing: The ESL research and its implications", TESOL Quarterly, 27(4), pp.657~675 (1993)
  51. Sung, J., "English lexical collocations and their relation to spoken fluency of adult non-native speakers", 박사, pp.2003
  52. Stegemoller, J., "A comparison of an international student and an immigrant student: Experiences with second language writing", The Reading Matrix, 4(3), pp.58~85 (2004)
  53. Tannen, D., "Spoken and written language: Exploring orality and literacy" (1982), Ablex
  54. Winograd, P., "Strategic difficulties in summarizing texts", Reading Research Quarterly, 19, pp.404~425 (1984)
  55. Wolf-Quintero, K., "Second language development in writing: Measures of fluency, accuracy and complexity" (1998), Second language teaching and curriculum center
  56. Yuen, W. T., "Textual cohesion and reading comprehension", 석사, pp.1993
  57. Zhang, X., "English collocations and their effect on the writing of native and non-native college freshmen", 박사, pp.1993

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)