본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

鲁迅与沈从文的尼采接受研究 -20年代文学经典化与尼采中国化为中心-

A Study on Nietzsche Acceptance of Lu Xun and Shen Congwen

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

Nietzsche was introduced to China as a writer in the early 20th century, and he had a greater influence in the literary world than in the philosophical world. Lu Xun was a pioneer of modern Chinese literature and a crucial figure in the process of Nietzsche's sinicization. He is known as “China's Nietzsche”. In the 1920s, Lu Xun had become the center of the literary world. The canonization of Lu Xun in the literary world and the Sinicization of Nietzsche were a complementary process. At this time, Shen Congwen, another classic writer in the history of modern Chinese literature, appeared in the literary world, but he was only a marginal figure. With the gradual canonization of Shen Congwen, he opened up a new realm of “Lu Xun's Nietzsche” in the second half of the 1920s and deepened Nietzsche's influence in China. It is generally believed that,after 1925, Nietzsche's upsurge in China has ebbed, but from the perspective of Shen Congwen's acceptance of Nietzsche's art and aesthetics, Nietzsche not only did not “ebb” in literary and artistic aesthetics, but was continued and deepened in modern Chinese literature.

Abstract

Nietzsche was introduced to China as a writer in the early 20th century, and he had a greater influence in the literary world than in the philosophical world. Lu Xun was a pioneer of modern Chinese literature and a crucial figure in the process of Nietzsche's sinicization. He is known as “China's Nietzsche”. In the 1920s, Lu Xun had become the center of the literary world. The canonization of Lu Xun in the literary world and the Sinicization of Nietzsche were a complementary process. At this time, Shen Congwen, another classic writer in the history of modern Chinese literature, appeared in the literary world, but he was only a marginal figure. With the gradual canonization of Shen Congwen, he opened up a new realm of “Lu Xun's Nietzsche” in the second half of the 1920s and deepened Nietzsche's influence in China. It is generally believed that,after 1925, Nietzsche's upsurge in China has ebbed, but from the perspective of Shen Congwen's acceptance of Nietzsche's art and aesthetics, Nietzsche not only did not “ebb” in literary and artistic aesthetics, but was continued and deepened in modern Chinese literature.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. 고건혜, "중국현대문학에서의 니체(尼采) 수용 연구 - 현대성과 현대문학의 발생에 중심으로", 니체연구, (37), pp.171~212 (2020), 한국니체학회[DOI]
  2. 尼采, "查拉图斯特拉如是说" (2000), 漓江出版社
  3. 尼采, "尼采美学文选" (2009), 上海人民出版社
  4. 费冬梅, "沈从文:从边缘到中心的位移", 海南师范大学学报 (2014)
  5. 黄怀军, "化用与背离 : 沈从文对尼采的处置", 中国文学研究 (2016)
  6. 黄怀军, "中国现代作家与尼采", 博士, pp.2007
  7. 고건혜, "色彩词的文学性研究- 沈从文小说为中心", 중어중문학, (77), pp.3~26 (2019), 한국중어중문학회[DOI]
  8. 고건혜, "≪边城≫与≪城堡≫文本含混性对比研究", 중국어문학, (72), pp.61~87 (2016), 영남중국어문학회[DOI]
  9. 鲁迅, "鲁迅全集" (2005), 人民文学出版社
  10. 李林荣, "鲁迅“尼采”的踪迹及意蕴" (2013), 山东社会科学
  11. 李宗刚, "≪新青年≫编辑约稿与鲁迅现代小说的诞生", 华中师范大学学报 (2017)
  12. 闵抗生, "鲁迅研究动态" (1986)
  13. 闵抗生, "<墓碣文>与≪Also Sprach Zarathustra≫", 扬州师院学报 (1989)
  14. 沈从文, "沈从文文集" (1984), 花城出版社
  15. 杨联芬, "晚清与五四文学的国民性焦虑(三)", 鲁迅研究月刊, ~ (2003)
  16. 伊藤虎丸, "鲁迅早期的尼采观与明治文学", 文学评论 (1990)
  17. 伊藤虎丸, "鲁迅, 创造社与日本文学" (1995), 北京大学出版社
  18. 张钰, "重回历史现场-从接受视角重新认识≪狂人日记≫", 硕士, pp.2015
  19. 左轶凡, "作为燃料的青舂及其表达-≪新青年≫杂志研究", 博士, pp.2014
  20. 张钊贻, "鲁迅:中国“温和”的尼采" (2011), 北京大学出版社

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)