본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

영어 경동사 Have와 Take의 변이에 대한 코퍼스 기반 연구

On the Variation of English Light Verbs Have and Take: A Corpus-based Analysis.

1

조회

0

다운로드

12

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

The so-called light verbs in English have very often been discussed both in traditional grammar and generative linguistics. The variation shown in these verbs, especially that of have a NOUN vs. take a NOUN, however, has only been very briefly mentioned, with few previous studies having provided an extensive empirical analysis of the variation, thereby letting the phenomenon remain mostly a matter of preference in British or American English. This study investigates the variation between the light verb predicates have a NOUN and take a NOUN on the basis of the analysis of data from ten English corpora. The results indicate that while have a NOUN is generally preferred in British English, this preference is maintained only in three genres including spoken, fiction, and academic texts, with take a NOUN, the American form, being more common in magazines and newspapers. The use of take a NOUN in American English has also shown a continuous increase in the last 200 years to become the dominant form. This increase and dominance of the take form in American English is very likely to have exerted influence on world Englishes including British English, resulting in the increase of the take form and decrease of the alternative have form in almost every national variety of English.

Abstract

The so-called light verbs in English have very often been discussed both in traditional grammar and generative linguistics. The variation shown in these verbs, especially that of have a NOUN vs. take a NOUN, however, has only been very briefly mentioned, with few previous studies having provided an extensive empirical analysis of the variation, thereby letting the phenomenon remain mostly a matter of preference in British or American English. This study investigates the variation between the light verb predicates have a NOUN and take a NOUN on the basis of the analysis of data from ten English corpora. The results indicate that while have a NOUN is generally preferred in British English, this preference is maintained only in three genres including spoken, fiction, and academic texts, with take a NOUN, the American form, being more common in magazines and newspapers. The use of take a NOUN in American English has also shown a continuous increase in the last 200 years to become the dominant form. This increase and dominance of the take form in American English is very likely to have exerted influence on world Englishes including British English, resulting in the increase of the take form and decrease of the alternative have form in almost every national variety of English.

참고문헌 (45)

  1. Adger, D., "Core Syntax: A Minimalist Approach" (2003), Oxford University Press
  2. Akimoto, M., "A Study of Verbo-nominal Structures in English" (1989), Shinozaki Shorin
  3. Algeo, J., "The Verb in Contemporary English: Theory and Description", pp.203~217 (1995), Cambridge University Press
  4. Algeo, J., "British or American English?" (2006), Cambridge University Press
  5. Allerton, D. J., "Stretched Verb Constructions in English" (2002), Routledge
  6. Baker, M. C., "Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing" (1988), The University of Chicago Press
  7. Biber, D., "Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English" (1999), Longman
  8. Brinton, L., "Collocational and Idiomatic Aspects of Composite Predicates in the History of English" (1999), Benjamins
  9. Brugman, C., "Light Verbs and Polysemy", Language Sciences, 23(4), pp.551~578 (2001)
  10. Butt, M., "Complex Predicates: Cross-linguistic Perspectives on Event Structure", pp.48~78 (2010), Cambridge University Press
  11. Cattell, R., "Composite Predicates in English, Syntax and Semantics Vol. 17" (1984), Academic Press
  12. Chomsky, N., "The Minimalist Program" (1995), The MIT Press
  13. "Collins Cobuild English Grammar" (1995), HarperCollins Publishers
  14. Curme, G. O., "Syntax: A Grammar of the English Language" (1931), Heath
  15. Dixon, R. M. W., "A Semantic Approach to English Grammar" (2005), Oxford University Press
  16. Hale, K., "The View from Building 20", pp.53~71 (1993), The MIT Press
  17. Henry, A., "The Handbook of Language Variation and Change", pp.267~282 (2002), Blackwell Publishing
  18. Heringer, H. J., "Lesen, Lehren, Lernen: Eine Rezeptive Grammatik des Deutschen" (1989), Niemeyer
  19. Hoffmann, A. S., "Mandative Sentences. A Study of Variation on the Basis of the British National Corpus", Unpublished Lizentiats-Arbeit, Universität Zürich, ~ (1997)
  20. Hornstein, N., "Understanding Minimalism" (2005), Cambridge University Press
  21. Huddleston, R., "The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language" (2002), Cambridge University Press
  22. Jespersen, O., "A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles, Part VI, Morphology" (1942), George Allen and Unwin Ltd
  23. The Usual Suspects. Data-oriented Models for Identification and Representation of Lexical Collocations, "Krenn, B.", German Research Centre for Artificial Intelligence, ~ (2000)
  24. Kruisinga, E., "A Handbook of Present-Day English" (1932), Noordhoff
  25. Labuhn, U., "Von Give a Laugh bis Have a Cry. Zu Aspektualit ät und Transitivit ät der V+N-Konstruktionen im Englischen" (2001), Peter Lang
  26. Larson, R. K, "On the Double Object Construction", Linguistic Inquiry, 19, pp.335~391 (1988)
  27. Leech, G., "Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical Study", pp.166~180 (2009), Cambridge University Press
  28. Live, A. H., "The Take-Have Phrasal in English", Linguistics, 95, pp.31~50 (1973)
  29. Nickel, G., "Studies in Descriptive English Grammar", pp.63~83 (1968), Julius Groos
  30. Peters, P., "The Cambridge Guide to English Usage" (2004), Cambridge University Press
  31. Poutsma, H., "For the Use of Continental, Especially Dutch Students, Part. Ⅱ, The Parts of Speech, Section 2, The Verb and the Particles" (1926), Noordhoff
  32. Quirk, R., "Grammatical and Lexical Variance in English" (1995), Longman
  33. Quirk, R., "A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language" (1985), Longman
  34. Radford, A., "English Syntax: An Introduction" (2004), Cambridge University Press
  35. Radford, A., "Minimalist Syntax: Exploring the Structure of English" (2004), Cambridge University Press
  36. Renský, M., "English Verbo-Nominal Phrases: Some Structural and Stylistic Aspects", Travaux Linguistiques de Prague, 1, pp.289~299 (1966)
  37. Sapir, E., "Selected Writings of Edward Sapir in Language, Culture and Personality" (1949), University of California Press
  38. Stein, G., "The Phrasal Verb ‘Type To Have A Look’ in Modern English", International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 29, pp.1~30 (1991)
  39. Stein, G., "English Corpus Linguistics. Studies in Honour of Jan Svartvik", pp.197~203 (1991), Longman
  40. Stroik, T, "On the Light Verb Hypothesis", Linguistic Inquiry, 32(2), pp.362~369 (2001)
  41. Swan, M., "Practical English Usage" (2005), Oxford University Press
  42. Trudgill, P., "Dynamic Have in North American and British Isles English", English Language and Linguistics, 6(1), pp.1~15 (2002)
  43. Wierzbicka, A., "Why Can You Have a Drink When You Can't *Have an Eat?", Language, 58(4), pp.753~799 (1982)
  44. Wierzbicka, A., "The Semantics of Grammar" (1988), John Benjamins
  45. Wolfram, W., "The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics 13", pp.333~341 (2006)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)