본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Effects of Decomposability on L2 Learners’ Comprehension and Translation of Formulaic Sequences in English

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

The present study investigated how the factor of decomposability affected Korean L2 learners' comprehension of formulaic sequences in English through a translation task. Thirty Korean L2 learners of English participated in a translation task which was designed to probe the participants’ knowledge of twenty formulaic sequences in English differing in the degree of decomposability and frequency. The results showed that although the Korean L2 learners of English generally showed accurate understanding of the English formulaic sequences, their degree of understanding were significantly affected by whether the meaning of the formulaic sequence was decomposable or not. Formulaic sequences for which the overall meaning of the sequence could be gleaned from the meaning of its parts showed higher accuracy than those that were non-decomposable. These results suggest that decomposability is a factor that not only affects the processing of native speakers, but also that of L2 learners. The effects of different types of tasks in L2 studies are also discussed.

Abstract

The present study investigated how the factor of decomposability affected Korean L2 learners' comprehension of formulaic sequences in English through a translation task. Thirty Korean L2 learners of English participated in a translation task which was designed to probe the participants’ knowledge of twenty formulaic sequences in English differing in the degree of decomposability and frequency. The results showed that although the Korean L2 learners of English generally showed accurate understanding of the English formulaic sequences, their degree of understanding were significantly affected by whether the meaning of the formulaic sequence was decomposable or not. Formulaic sequences for which the overall meaning of the sequence could be gleaned from the meaning of its parts showed higher accuracy than those that were non-decomposable. These results suggest that decomposability is a factor that not only affects the processing of native speakers, but also that of L2 learners. The effects of different types of tasks in L2 studies are also discussed.

참고문헌 (36)

  1. Alegre, M., "Frequency Effects and the Representational Status of Regular Inflections", Journal of Memory and Language, 40, pp.41~46 (1999)
  2. Conklin, K., "Formulaic Sequences: Are They Processed More Quickly than Nonformulaic Language by Native and Non-native Speakers?", Applied Linguistics, 29, pp.72~89 (2008)
  3. Danks, J., "Cognitive Processes in Translation and Interpretating", pp.161~175 (1997), Sage
  4. de Cock, S., "Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory", pp.51~68 (2000), Rodopi
  5. Fan, M, "An Explanatory Study of Collocational Use by ESL Students : A Task-based Approach", System, 37, pp.110~123 (2009)
  6. Gibbs, R., "Psycholinguistic Studies on the Syntactic Behaviour of Idioms", Cognitive Psychology, 21, pp.100~138 (1989)
  7. Gibbs, R., "How to Kick the Bucket and Not Decompose : Analyzability and Idiom Processing", Journal of Memory and Language, 28, pp.576~593 (1989)
  8. Granger, S., "Phraseology: Theory, Analysis and Applications", pp.185~204 (1998), Oxford University Press
  9. Havik, E. Roberts, L., "Processing Subject-Object Ambiguities in the L2 : A Self-Paced Reading Study with German L2 Learners of Dutch", Language Learning, 59, pp.73~112 (2009)
  10. Howarth, P, "Phraseology and Second Language Proficiency", Applied Linguistics, 19, pp.24~44 (1998)
  11. Irujo, S, "A Piece of Cake : Learning and Teaching Idioms", ELT Journal, 40, pp.236~242 (1986)
  12. Jackson, C., "The Processing and Comprehension of Wh-Questions Among Second Language Speakers of German", Applied Psycholinguistics, 30, pp.603~636 (2009)
  13. Kapatinski, V., "Formulaic Language", pp.499~522 (2009), John Benjamins
  14. Giving Learners a Break: Native Language Intuitions as a Source of Predictions About Transferability, "Kellerman, E.", 309~315, pp.Working Papers in Bilingualism 15 (1978)
  15. Kim. J, "Factors Affecting the Use of Formulaic Sequences by L2 Learners", Language and Linguistics, 55, pp.105~126 (2012)
  16. Kim, S., "Frequency Effects in L2 Multi-Word Unit Processing : Evidence from Self-Paced Reading", TESOL Quarterly, 46, pp.831~841 (2012)
  17. Kuiper, K., "Smooth Talkers: The Linguistic Performance of Auctioneers and Sportscasters" (1996), Lawrence Earlbaum
  18. Kuiper, K., "Livestock Auctions, Oral Poetry, and Ordinary Language", Language in Society, 13, pp.205~234 (1984)
  19. Leeser, M., "Applied Priming Methods to L2 Learning, Teaching and Research: Insights from Psycholinguistics", pp.179~198 (2011), Benjamins
  20. Lim, J., "Second Language Processing in Reading for Comprehension and Translation", Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16, pp.518~537 (2013)
  21. Macizo, P., "When Translation Makes the Difference : Sentence Processing in Reading and Translation", Psicológica, 25, pp.181~205 (2004)
  22. Myles, F., "Rote or Rule? Exploring the Role of Formulaic Language in Classroom Foreign Language Learning", Language Learning, 28, pp.323~363 (1998)
  23. Pawley, A., "Language and Communication" (1983), Longman
  24. Peters, A., "The Units of Language Acquisition" (1983), Cambridge University Press
  25. Schmidt, R., "Sociolinguistics and Language Acquisition", pp.137~174 (1983), Newbury House
  26. Schmitt, N., "Formulaic Sequences", pp.173~189 (2004), John Benjamins
  27. Sereno, J., "Processing of English Inflectional Morphology", Memory and Cognition, 25, pp.425~437 (1997)
  28. Siyanova, A., "Adding More Fuel to the Fire : An Eye-tracking Study of Idiom Processing by Native and Non-native Speakers", Second Language Research, 27, pp.251~272 (2011)
  29. Sosa, A., "Evidence for Frequency-based Constituents in the Mental Lexicon : Collocations Involving the Word of", Brain and Language, 83, pp.227~236 (2002)
  30. Titone, D., "One of the Compositional and Noncompositional Nature of Idiomatic Expressions", Journal of Pragmatics, 31, pp.1655~1674 (1999)
  31. Underwood, G., "Formulaic Sequences", pp.153~172 (2004), John Benjamins
  32. Williams, J, "Incremental Interpretation in Second Language Sentence Processing", Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 9, pp.71~81 (2006)
  33. Wong-Fillmore, L., "The Second Time Around: Cognitive and Social Strategies in Second Language Acquisition", pp.1976
  34. Wray, A., "Formulaic Language and the Lexicon" (2002), Cambridge University Press
  35. Wray, A., "The Functions of Formulaic Language : An Integrated Model", Language and Communication, 20, pp.1~28 (2000)
  36. Yamashita, J., "L1 Influence on the Acquisition of L2 Collocations : Japanese ESL Users and EFL Learners Acquiring English Collocations", TESOL Quarterly, 44, pp.647~668 (2010)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)