20세기 후기 중국 공상과학소설 속 비극성에 관한 고찰
A study of the tragedy on Chinese science fiction in the late 20th Century
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Comparing Chinese science fiction in the 1980s and 1990s, it should be said that works in the 1980s were at a clear opposite point to the 1990s trend of work, which was exposed to the active trend of reform and opening up. This is because if Chinese science fiction empirically shows futility in the 1980s, socialist ideals, and Confucian traditional values disappear and pluralistic values begin to emerge in the 1990s. Therefore, the 1990s can be regarded as the starting point for announcing the new literary trend of Chinese science fiction. Nevertheless, since modern times, Chinese science fiction has not easily escaped the shadow of the perception that it is a means of enlightenment for the transfer of scientific knowledge. However, because the story of criticizing the country or system is still taboo amid the ever-increasing censorship and control of the Internet in China, and that many Chinese science fictions originate from the Internet, it is not enough to simply lead to a political position. In short, since the 1980s, Chinese science fiction has outlined various aspects amid the inevitable influence on public cultural factors. However, despite international interest in Chinese science fiction, related research in China is mainly focused on late Qing China works, and considering the works themselves, it is understood that Western academia has been actively conducting research. Then, if we have to overcome the difficulties faced by the Chinese science fiction community, which is in self-conflict today, and seek the development of Chinese science fiction, where should the discussion begin? The researcher believes that an integrated analysis should precede the interrelationship between Hong Kong and neighboring Taiwan, considering the nature of today's literature and China's special cultural and social background that crosses boundaries. This process can be a useful way to reflect on the literary location and meaning of Chinese science fiction and to grasp the limitations and significance revealed in Chinese science fiction. It has been pointed out as a regret that the works of Taiwanese and Hong Kong artists cannot be found in numerous Chinese science fiction books published on the Chinese continent so far, and the public comparative review of the three regional works appearing in different cultural backgrounds is of great significance in many aspects. First of all, this discussion aims to derive awareness of the ideological framework of nature and myths in these works and analyze how the artist tried to resolve the corresponding ecological relationship between humans and nature. This is no different from exploring the intrinsic way of thinking of the Chinese.
Abstract
Comparing Chinese science fiction in the 1980s and 1990s, it should be said that works in the 1980s were at a clear opposite point to the 1990s trend of work, which was exposed to the active trend of reform and opening up. This is because if Chinese science fiction empirically shows futility in the 1980s, socialist ideals, and Confucian traditional values disappear and pluralistic values begin to emerge in the 1990s. Therefore, the 1990s can be regarded as the starting point for announcing the new literary trend of Chinese science fiction. Nevertheless, since modern times, Chinese science fiction has not easily escaped the shadow of the perception that it is a means of enlightenment for the transfer of scientific knowledge. However, because the story of criticizing the country or system is still taboo amid the ever-increasing censorship and control of the Internet in China, and that many Chinese science fictions originate from the Internet, it is not enough to simply lead to a political position. In short, since the 1980s, Chinese science fiction has outlined various aspects amid the inevitable influence on public cultural factors. However, despite international interest in Chinese science fiction, related research in China is mainly focused on late Qing China works, and considering the works themselves, it is understood that Western academia has been actively conducting research. Then, if we have to overcome the difficulties faced by the Chinese science fiction community, which is in self-conflict today, and seek the development of Chinese science fiction, where should the discussion begin? The researcher believes that an integrated analysis should precede the interrelationship between Hong Kong and neighboring Taiwan, considering the nature of today's literature and China's special cultural and social background that crosses boundaries. This process can be a useful way to reflect on the literary location and meaning of Chinese science fiction and to grasp the limitations and significance revealed in Chinese science fiction. It has been pointed out as a regret that the works of Taiwanese and Hong Kong artists cannot be found in numerous Chinese science fiction books published on the Chinese continent so far, and the public comparative review of the three regional works appearing in different cultural backgrounds is of great significance in many aspects. First of all, this discussion aims to derive awareness of the ideological framework of nature and myths in these works and analyze how the artist tried to resolve the corresponding ecological relationship between humans and nature. This is no different from exploring the intrinsic way of thinking of the Chinese.
참고문헌 (26)
- 노성숙, "계몽과 신화의 변증법", 철학연구, 50 (2000)
- 니체, "바그너의 경우・우상의 황혼・안티크리스트 이 사람을 보라・디오니소스 송가・니체 대 바그너" (2002), 책세상
- 양해림, "니체와 老子의 생태학적 자연관", 철학, 69 (2001)
- 이서규, "니체의 탈형이상학적 자연해석에 대한 고찰", 범한철학, 81(2), pp.175~208 (2016), 범한철학회
- 이진우, "니체 이해의 새로운 지평" (2000), 철학과 현실사
- 정진범, "아도르노 역사철학에서의 자연 개념", 석사, 서양철학, pp.2005
- 프리드리히 니체, "비극의 탄생" (2007), 아카넷
- 홍일희, "니체 철학에서 생명의 자연성과 인위성-도덕비판을 중심으로-", 범한철학, 30 (2003)
- 홍일희, "인간과 자연의 관계정립의 문제-니체 철학을 중심으로-", 철학논총, 3(37), pp.237~258 (2004), 새한철학회
- 董仁威, "中國百年科幻史話" (2007), 清华大學出版社
- 何夕, "六道衆生:何夕科幻自選集" (2012), 長江文藝出版社
- 黄海, "臺灣科幻薪火錄(1956-2005)" (2007), 五南圖書出版社公司
- 姜維端, "這麽多年,中國科幻走上了一條和西方主流科幻不同的道路?" (2017), 澎湃新聞
- 姜雲生, "臺灣科幻小說大全" (1994), 福建少年兒童出版社
- 李琳, "華文文學" (2008)
- 劉秀美, "現代中文學刊" (2008)
- 劉興詩, "幻想的歷程≪中外科幻小說大觀≫" (1994), 上海少年兒童出版社
- 汤哲聲, "20世紀中國科幻小說創作發展史論", 文藝爭鳴, (6) (2003)
- 王晉康, "替天行道:王晉康科幻小說精選集11" (2011), 時代文藝出版社
- 王衛英, "港臺科幻小說的民族風格架构與通俗化之路", 當代文壇, (4) (2005)
- 許達然, "苦悶與象征:六○~七○年代臺灣社會和文學" (2007), 臺灣文津出版社
- 張系國, "張系國自選集" (1982), 臺灣黎名出版社
- Han Song, "Chinese Science Fiction: A Response to Modernization", Science Fiction Studies, 40(1) (2013)[DOI]
- Norman Spinrad, "Modern Science Fiction" (1974), Anchor
- Song Mingwei, "Variations on Utopia in Contemporary Chinese Science Fiction", Science Fiction Studies, 40(1) (2013)[DOI]
- Tidhar Lavie, "Science Fiction, Globalisation and the People's Republic of China", Foundation: The International Review of Science Fiction, 89 (2003)
