고대 티베트어 어두 복자음의 현대 티베트 방언에서 실현 양상 차이에 관한 연구 — 위짱 방언을 대상으로 —
A Study on difference in the realization of Old Tibetan consonant clusters in modern Tibetan dialects – focused on the Ü-Tsang dialect
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Tibetan language is of which is spoken by the tibetan tribes living in P.R. China and surrounding countries, and Ü-Tsang dialect is used in the central and western area of Xizang Autonomous Region. Onset consonant cluster, of which is one of the important characteristics in Tibetan language, is known as the disappeared in Ü-Tsang dialect, e.g Lhasa dialect. But, some dialects in Houzangtuyu such as Gar dialect at Ü-Tsang preserve consonant cluster under restrictive conditions. This kind of difference between Lhasa dialect and Gar dialect is resulted from the distinction between the constraint hierarchies. In Lhasa dialect of which constraints *Complex-Onset, I-Contig, *Vd-Obs Onset rank high, consonant cluster can’t be parsed and change into single consonant. But if subscript is ɹ, segments in front of ɹ are parsed as voiceless retroflex affricate. Though consonant clusters are kept under specific conditions in Gar dialect of which constraint Onset-Cond dominates other constraints, but the first phoneme is fixed as ‘n’ because of constraints *σ[[-Nas]∨[-Cor]CV.
Abstract
Tibetan language is of which is spoken by the tibetan tribes living in P.R. China and surrounding countries, and Ü-Tsang dialect is used in the central and western area of Xizang Autonomous Region. Onset consonant cluster, of which is one of the important characteristics in Tibetan language, is known as the disappeared in Ü-Tsang dialect, e.g Lhasa dialect. But, some dialects in Houzangtuyu such as Gar dialect at Ü-Tsang preserve consonant cluster under restrictive conditions. This kind of difference between Lhasa dialect and Gar dialect is resulted from the distinction between the constraint hierarchies. In Lhasa dialect of which constraints *Complex-Onset, I-Contig, *Vd-Obs Onset rank high, consonant cluster can’t be parsed and change into single consonant. But if subscript is ɹ, segments in front of ɹ are parsed as voiceless retroflex affricate. Though consonant clusters are kept under specific conditions in Gar dialect of which constraint Onset-Cond dominates other constraints, but the first phoneme is fixed as ‘n’ because of constraints *σ[[-Nas]∨[-Cor]CV.
참고문헌 (19)
- 안상철, "최적성 이론의 언어분석" (2003), 한국문화사
- 조성문, "최적성이론에 의한 자음군 단순화 현상의 방언 차이 분석", 사회언어학 (2000)
- 陳榮澤, "藏語方言的分布格局及其形成的曆史地理人文背景", 中央民族大學學報(哲學社會科學版), (2) (2016)
- 格桑居冕, "藏語方言概論" (2002), 民族出版社
- 江荻, "藏语db-音类的演化过程及时间层次", 民族語文, (5) (1997)
- 朴奎貞, "对上古音"C+L"複声母的优选论分析", 중국학, 49 (2014)
- 孫宏開, "原始漢藏語的復輔音問題——關於原始漢藏語音節結構構擬的理論思考之一", 民族語文, (6) (1999)
- 施向東, "漢藏語唇輔音與半元音w的交替", 語言研究, (2) (2006)
- 瞿霭堂, "藏語卫藏方言研究" (2017), 中国藏学出版社
- 許仕波, "藏語山南拉郊話語音研究", 碩士, pp.2020
- 扎西旦达, "卫藏方言语音研究", 硕士, pp.2010
- Goldstein, Melvyn C, "The New Tibetan-English Dictionary of Modern Tibetan" (2002), University of California Press
- Hill, Nathan W, "An Overview of Old Tibetan Synchronic Phonology", Transactions of the Philological Society, 108(2) (2010)
- Kager, Rene, "Optimality Theory" (2001), 外语教学与研究出版社
- McCarthy, J. J, "Optimality Theory in Phonology" (2004), Blackwell Publishing
- McCarthy, J. J, "Optimality Theory in Phonology" (2004), Blackwell Publishing
- Itô, Junko, "Optimality Theory in Phonology" (2004), Blackwell Publishing
- Wheeler, Max W, "Cluster Reduction: Deletion or Coalescence?", Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 4 (2005)
- Sprigg, Richard K, "Vowel harmony in Lhasa Tibetan: prosodic analysis applied to interrelated vocalic features of successive syllables", Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, 24(1) (1961)