본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

现代汉语普通名词作状语的句法语义接口研究

The Syntax-Semantics Interface of Common Nouns Functioning as Adverbials in Modern Chinese

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

This study explores the adverbialization of common nouns in Mandarin Chinese, revealing its cognitive mechanisms and syntactic realization. The study identifies dual cognitive motivations: (1) Artificially constructed nouns (e.g., “优惠价销售” [sell at discounted price]) activate implicit semantic roles (e.g., instrument/manner) via functional alignment with verbs without morphological markers; (2) Qualitative nouns (e.g., “深情 诉说” [speak with emotion], “全程跟踪” [track throughout]) achieve syntactic compatibility through inherent evaluative features or scope morphemes (“全” [full]). These constructions follow two constraints: semantic specification ensuring precise action parameterization (material/ basis) and phonological rhythm favoring disyllabic “2+2” structures (e.g., “电话联系” [contact by phone]). Non-conforming cases rely on parallelism (e.g., “南征北战” [fight north/south]) or syllable adjustment. Compared to case-marked adverbials, noun adverbialization emphasizes interaction between semantic integration and prosodic optimization. By constructing a cognitive framework-semantic role-syntactic realization triad, this research explicates dynamic noun decategorization mechanisms, offering a novel paradigm for studying Chinese grammatical flexibility and typological comparisons.

Abstract

This study explores the adverbialization of common nouns in Mandarin Chinese, revealing its cognitive mechanisms and syntactic realization. The study identifies dual cognitive motivations: (1) Artificially constructed nouns (e.g., “优惠价销售” [sell at discounted price]) activate implicit semantic roles (e.g., instrument/manner) via functional alignment with verbs without morphological markers; (2) Qualitative nouns (e.g., “深情 诉说” [speak with emotion], “全程跟踪” [track throughout]) achieve syntactic compatibility through inherent evaluative features or scope morphemes (“全” [full]). These constructions follow two constraints: semantic specification ensuring precise action parameterization (material/ basis) and phonological rhythm favoring disyllabic “2+2” structures (e.g., “电话联系” [contact by phone]). Non-conforming cases rely on parallelism (e.g., “南征北战” [fight north/south]) or syllable adjustment. Compared to case-marked adverbials, noun adverbialization emphasizes interaction between semantic integration and prosodic optimization. By constructing a cognitive framework-semantic role-syntactic realization triad, this research explicates dynamic noun decategorization mechanisms, offering a novel paradigm for studying Chinese grammatical flexibility and typological comparisons.

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)