한국인 화자의 문법상 선택과 요인에 관한 연구
A Study on Korean Aspectual Choice and Factors by Native Speakers
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Recently, the relationship between grammatical aspects and aspectual factors such as telicity, transitivity, subject animacy, and location adverbs in English has been a topic of interest in language acquisition and psycholinguistics. This study aimed to deepen our understanding of the relationship between universal features of grammatical aspects and Korean grammatical aspect markers, as well as the strength of each factor in the grammatical choice. A forced-choice sentence completion task was performed for 55 Korean adult native speakers. The simple past tense ‘-ess-,’ expressed in perfect and imperfect forms, was used for all basic sentences, respectively. As a result, it was revealed that all factors of telicity, transitivity, subject animacy, and location information were universal semantic factors that significantly affected the grammatical choice of the Korean language. In terms of the hierarchy of influence among factors, telicity was the most decisive factor, and transitivity was the least strong. Transitivity was also weaker than the subject’s animacy and locative information, which were assumed to have the weakest linkage or correlation with grammatical aspect markers. It was newly analyzed as a result of reflecting the unique and specific individuality regarding grammatical aspect of the Korean sentence structures. This study is meaningful in the light of providing cross -linguistically empirical data by clarifying the relationship between the structure-semantic-discourse-based factors and Korean grammatical Aspect and by revealing the hierarchy of influences through experiments.
Abstract
Recently, the relationship between grammatical aspects and aspectual factors such as telicity, transitivity, subject animacy, and location adverbs in English has been a topic of interest in language acquisition and psycholinguistics. This study aimed to deepen our understanding of the relationship between universal features of grammatical aspects and Korean grammatical aspect markers, as well as the strength of each factor in the grammatical choice. A forced-choice sentence completion task was performed for 55 Korean adult native speakers. The simple past tense ‘-ess-,’ expressed in perfect and imperfect forms, was used for all basic sentences, respectively. As a result, it was revealed that all factors of telicity, transitivity, subject animacy, and location information were universal semantic factors that significantly affected the grammatical choice of the Korean language. In terms of the hierarchy of influence among factors, telicity was the most decisive factor, and transitivity was the least strong. Transitivity was also weaker than the subject’s animacy and locative information, which were assumed to have the weakest linkage or correlation with grammatical aspect markers. It was newly analyzed as a result of reflecting the unique and specific individuality regarding grammatical aspect of the Korean sentence structures. This study is meaningful in the light of providing cross -linguistically empirical data by clarifying the relationship between the structure-semantic-discourse-based factors and Korean grammatical Aspect and by revealing the hierarchy of influences through experiments.
참고문헌 (28)
- 강범모, "술어 명사의 의미 구조", 언어학, (31), pp.3~30 (2002), 사단법인 한국언어학회
- 김종도, "우리말의 상 연구", 한글, 219 (1993), 한글학회
- 김천학, "동사와 상에 관한 유형론적 연구 -한국어의 완망상과 비완망상에 대하여-", 한국어학, 57, pp.179~206 (2012), 한국어학회
- 김천학, "한국어 동사의 종결성(telicity)에 대한 연구", 언어와 정보 사회, 21, pp.23~51 (2014), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
- 박진호, "시제, 상, 양태", 國語學, (60), pp.289~322 (2011), 국어학회[DOI]
- 박현아, "한국어 화자의 러시아어 일반사실적 불완료상 습득", 박사, 언어학과, pp.2012
- 조민정, "국어의 상에 대한 연구", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.2001
- 최재웅, "한국어 어미 {-시-}와 무정성", 한국어 의미학, 15, pp.273~301 (2004), 한국어의미학회
- 최재웅, "통계적 검증을 이용한 어휘분류 목록 비교: 한국어 형용사를 대상으로", 언어와언어학, (38), pp.185~211 (2006), 언어연구소
- 한정한, "타동사의 언어유형적 특성과 한국어", 한국사전학회 학술대회 발표 논문집 (2016)
- Comrie, B., "Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems" (1976), Cambridge University Press
- Daniel G. M., "Spatial models, prepositions, and verb‐aspect markers, Discourse Processes", Discourse Processes, 13(4), pp.441~469 (1990)
- Emmott, C., "Narrative comprehension: a discourse perspective" (1997), Oxford University Press
- Ferretti, T., "Verb aspect and the activation of event knowledge", Journal of Experimental Psychology : Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, pp.182~196 (2007)
- Fedder, J. C., "Being up front : narrative context and aspectual choice", Language and Cognition, 7(2), pp.1~26 (2014)
- Hopper, P. J., "Syntax and semantics 12: discourse and syntax", pp.213~241 (1979), Academic Press
- 오은정, "Korean Speakers’ Aspectual Choice in English: Influence from Telicity, Transitivity, and Subject Animacy", 언어정보, (24), pp.5~28 (2017), 언어정보연구소
- 오은정, "Korean Speakers’ Sensitivity to Factors Linked to Grammatical Aspect in English", 영어학연구, 23(3), pp.21~46 (2017), 한국영어학학회[DOI]
- Shirai, Y., "The acquisition of tense-aspect marking in apanese as a second language", Language Learning, 48(2), pp.245~279 (1998)
- Slabakova, R., "Telicity in the second language" (2001), John Benjamins
- Smith, C., "The Parameter of Aspect" (1991), Kluwer
- Sohn, H. M., "The Korean Language" (2001), Cambridge University Press
- Resultatives in Korean Revisited: Complementation versus Adjunction, "Son, M. J.", Tromsø University, 89~113 (2008)
- van Hout, A., "Events as grammatical objects", pp.239~281 (2000), CSLI Publications
- Wagner, L., "Children’s comprehension of completion entailments in the absence of agency cues", Journal of Child Language, 29(1), pp.109~125 (2002)
- Wagner, L., "Aspectual bootstrapping in language acquisition : telicity and transitivity", Language Learning and Development, 2(1), pp.51~76 (2006)
- Wagner, L., "I’ll never grow up : continuity in aspect representations", Linguistics, 47(5), pp.1051~1074 (2009)
- 여승주, "Some Notes on Resultatives in Korean", 생성문법연구, 16(4), pp.717~736 (2006), 한국생성문법학회