The Practice and Recording of Censorship in Colonial Korea: A Critical Review of the Chosǒn Publication Monthly Police Report
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Recent studies on media censorship in colonial Korea have converged on the newly discovered ChosǒnPublication Monthly Police Report, published from 1928 to 1938 by the colonial government’s censorship bureau. These new studies do not explicitly problematize the issue of whether the Monthly Report is an accurate and comprehensive record of censorship activity or not. However, the record’s official stature does not necessarily guarantee accurate representation of the actual practice of censorship in that period. We found that the numbers of seized or erased articles recorded in the Monthly Report do not correspond with the numbers of articles actually expunged from newspaper pages. This study begins by problematizing the accuracy and comprehensiveness of the Monthly Report censorship records. In addition, it undertakes a comparative analysis of the Monthly Report and contemporary newspapers, employing both record-centric and page-centric approaches. This research also examines how the presence of censorship traces served as tangible evidence of colonial power.
Abstract
Recent studies on media censorship in colonial Korea have converged on the newly discovered Chosǒn Publication Monthly Police Report, published from 1928 to 1938 by the colonial government’s censorship bureau. These new studies do not explicitly problematize the issue of whether the Monthly Report is an accurate and comprehensive record of censorship activity or not. However, the record’s official stature does not necessarily guarantee accurate representation of the actual practice of censorship in that period. We found that the numbers of seized or erased articles recorded in the Monthly Report do not correspond with the numbers of articles actually expunged from newspaper pages. This study begins by problematizing the accuracy and comprehensiveness of the Monthly Report censorship records. In addition, it undertakes a comparative analysis of the Monthly Report and contemporary newspapers, employing both record-centric and page-centric approaches. This research also examines how the presence of censorship traces served as tangible evidence of colonial power.
참고문헌 (18)
- Choi, Kyeong-Hee, "Regime of Self-Effacement: A Shift of Censorship Policy from the 1920s and the 1930s", Paper presented at the ICAS 4 Conference (2005)
- Chong, Kunsik., "대만 출판경찰과 검열텍스트—조선과의 비교를 위하여", Paper presented at the International Conference of Academy of East Asian Studies (2009)
- Chong, Kunsik., "조선출판경찰월보의 비교연구", Paper presented at the International Conference of Academy of EastAsian Studies (2010)
- 정근식, "도서과의 설치와 일제 식민지출판경찰의 체계화, 1926-1929", 한국문학연구, (30), pp.103~169 (2006), 한국문학연구소
- 朝鮮総督府官房文書課, "朝鮮の言論と世相" (1927), Chosen Sotokufu
- 한기형, "근대시가의 ‘불온성’과 식민지 검열－『諺文新聞の詩歌』(1931)의 분석", 상허학보, 25, pp.75~96 (2009), 상허학회
- 한기형, "‘불온문서’의 창출과 식민지 출판경찰", 대동문화연구, (72), pp.445~488 (2010), 대동문화연구원[DOI]
- 한만수, "식민지시기 검열의 드러냄과 숨김", 배달말, (41), pp.203~231 (2007), 배달말학회
- 警務局圖書課, "朝鮮出版警察月報" (1935), Keimukyoku
- 警務局圖書課, "諺文新聞差押記事輯錄" (1932), Keimukyoku
- Komyol Yonguhoe, "식민지 검열, 제도 · 텍스트 · 실천" (2011), Somyong
- 박헌호, "‘文化政治’期 新聞의 位相과 反－檢閱의 內的論理― 1920年代 民間紙를 中心으로", 대동문화연구, (50), pp.199~259 (2005), 대동문화연구원
- 박헌호, "한국 근대문학 검열연구의 통계적 접근을 위한 시론-『조선출판경찰월보』와 식민지 조선의 구텐베르크 은하계", 외국문학연구, (38), pp.193~224 (2010), 외국문학연구소
- 이혜령, "식민지 검열과 “식민지-제국” 표상 -『조선출판경찰월보』의 다섯 가지 통계표가 말해주는 것", 대동문화연구, (72), pp.489~533 (2010), 대동문화연구원[DOI]
- Yi, Hyeryong, "검열의 미메시스—염상섭 광분, 극한의 내러티브로 본 예술의 규칙과 검열", Paper presented at the International Conference of the Academy of East Asian Studies (2010)
- 이상경, "『조선출판경찰월보』에 나타난 문학작품 검열양상 연구", 한국근대문학연구, 1(17), pp.389~422 (2008), 한국근대문학회[DOI]
- Yi, Sungil, "조선총독부의 기록관리정책과 식민통치", Paper presented at the Conference of the Korean Society of Archival Studies (2006)
- 유진희, "식민지 검열장의 형성과 그 안의 밖 -『朝鮮出版警察月報』에 있어 ‘支那’라는 메타 범주", 대동문화연구, (72), pp.415~443 (2010), 대동문화연구원[DOI]