Progressive Idealist: North Korean Views on Yulgok Yi I
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The strategies of DPRK academia toward the Confucian heritage of the Choson period have undergone several transformations during the long life of the regime and require a systematic diachronic analysis. The case of Yulgok Yi I (1536-1584) demonstrates the multiplicity of possible views on Confucian thinkers within North Korean academic discourse. Previous research in the DPRK on Yulgok has produced a number of texts related to his person and thought. An analysis of the passages concerning Yulgok in the earliest and the most recent authoritative publications within the sphere of the history of philosophy, Choson ch'orhaksa 1 (The History of Korean Philosophy 1, 1960) and Choson ch'orhak chonsa (The Complete History of Korean Philosophy, 2010), reveals that within DPRK academia there currently exist two diverse approaches toward this scholar. The traditional approach focuses on his class limitations and the essentially idealistic nature of his philosophy, while a more recent approach places more stress on the so-called progressive nature of his thought. Both of them present valuable material for further studies of ideology, scholarly practices, and the discursive techniques of North Korean academia.
Abstract
The strategies of DPRK academia toward the Confucian heritage of the Choson period have undergone several transformations during the long life of the regime and require a systematic diachronic analysis. The case of Yulgok Yi I (1536-1584) demonstrates the multiplicity of possible views on Confucian thinkers within North Korean academic discourse. Previous research in the DPRK on Yulgok has produced a number of texts related to his person and thought. An analysis of the passages concerning Yulgok in the earliest and the most recent authoritative publications within the sphere of the history of philosophy, Choson ch'orhaksa 1 (The History of Korean Philosophy 1, 1960) and Choson ch'orhak chonsa (The Complete History of Korean Philosophy, 2010), reveals that within DPRK academia there currently exist two diverse approaches toward this scholar. The traditional approach focuses on his class limitations and the essentially idealistic nature of his philosophy, while a more recent approach places more stress on the so-called progressive nature of his thought. Both of them present valuable material for further studies of ideology, scholarly practices, and the discursive techniques of North Korean academia.
참고문헌 (34)
- 장원목, "北韓의 花潭哲學 해석에 대한 반성- ‘太虛’개념을 중심으로-", 동서철학연구, (23), pp.255~ (2002), 한국동서철학회
- Chon, Chin Sok, "Istoriia koreiskoi filosofii [History of Korean philosophy. Vol. 1" (1966), Progress
- 최봉익, (1975), Sahoe kwahak ch’ulp’ansa
- 최봉익, "조선철학사 개요" (2009), Sahoe kwahak ch’ulp’ansa
- 전미영, "북한의 철학연구 동향 및 특성 - 학술지 분석을 중심으로", 철학사상, (23), pp.199~241 (2006), 철학사상연구소
- 정진석, "조선철학사 1" (1962), Kwahagwo˘n ch’ulp’ansa
- 정진석, "朝鮮哲学史" (1962), 弘文堂
- 정진석, "조선 철학사" (1988), Iso˘nggwa hyo˘nsilsa
- 정해섭, "조선철학사" (2007), Kim Ilso˘ng chonghap taehak ch’ulp’ansa
- 정성철, "조선철학사 2" (1987), Kwahak, paekkwasajo˘n ch’ulp’ansa
- 정성철, "조선륜리사상사 2" (1993), Kwahak paekkwasajo˘n chonghap ch’ulp’ansa
- "철학사전" (1970), Sahoe kwahak ch’ulp’ansa
- "철학사전" (1985), Sahoe kwahak ch’ulp’ansa
- "조선전사 9 (중세편, 리조사 2)" (1980), Kwahak paekkwasajo˘n ch’ulp’ansa
- "조선 철학 전사 1-15" (2010), Sahoe kwahak ch’ulp’ansa
- "조선사" (1955), Inmin kyo˘ngje taehak
- "조선단대사 (리조사 8)" (2011), Kwahak paekkwasajo˘n ch’ulp’ansa
- "조선의 이름난 작가와 일화" (2009), Paekkwasajo˘n ch’ulp’ansa
- "조선의 명인" (1962), Kwahagwo˘n ch’ulp’ansa
- "화담집" (1965), Sahoe kwahak ch’ulp’ansa
- 황의동, "이이" (2002), Yemun so˘wo˘n
- 김정일, "민족문화 유산과 민족적 민족적 전통에 대하여" (2006), Choso˘n rodongdang ch’ulp’ansa
- 김광진, "조선 경제 사상사 1" (1963), Kwahagwo˘n ch’ulp’ansa
- 김수영, "철학지식 (조선철학사)" (2009), Kwahak paekkwasajo˘n ch’ulp’ansa
- "민족 고전 해석" (1980), Kwahak, paekkwa sajo˘n ch’ulpchansa
- 변정암, "리이의 륜리사상", 철학연구, 107(4), pp.35~47 (2006)
- 리창화, "The educational thought of Ri Ryulgok", 철학연구, 2, pp.24~32 (1961)
- 리창화, "리이의 사회정치사상 사회정치사상", 철학연구, 1, pp.33~44 (1962)
- 리형일, "정다산의 철학사상", 력사과학, 2 (1955)
- 리형일, "리률곡의 사상에 대한 연구", 력사과학, 7, pp.31~53 (1956)
- 리상철, "률곡전서의 편찬과 편찬과 사례적 가치에 대하여", 김일성 종합 대학학보 (어문학), 43(2), pp.42~47 (1997)
- 로학희, "리이 철학의 철학사적 위치", 김일성 종합 대학학보 (철학, 경제학), 48(1), pp.19~24 (2002)
- 柳仁熙, "南北韓 栗谷哲學의 認識과 反省-新儒學에서 栗谷學의 地位", 栗谷思想硏究, 1, pp.521~535 (1994)
- 李楠永, "북한의 조선철학사 서술의 특징과 문제점", 철학연구, 23, pp.5~14 (1988)