본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Vernacular Visions in North and South Korea: Interlingual Translations of Unyŏng chŏn (The Tale of Unyŏng) and Ideologies of National Literature

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

This article focuses on two translations of The Tale of Unyŏng (Unyŏng chŏn 雲英傳, early seventeenth century) into vernacular Korean in South Korea (1960) and North Korea (1966). Looking beyond the classical paradigm of interlingual and intralingual translation as “translation proper” and “rewording,” respectively, the article argues that translations of classical Korean fiction from Literary Sinitic into vernacular Korean represented a form of transitional intralingual translation as each nation navigated away from active membership in the Sinographic Cosmopolis and attempted to establish a new national literature and literary medium. Whereas the South Korean translation is tethered closely to the Literary Sinitic original in terms of lexicon, orthography, and representation of classical allusions and perpetuates three tiers of literacy, the North Korean translation hews much more closely to spoken vernacular and traditional kungmun manuscript versions of classical fiction and embodies the overriding North Korean policy of sinograph abolition and han'gŭl promotion.

Abstract

This article focuses on two translations of The Tale of Unyŏng (Unyŏng chŏn 雲英傳, early seventeenth century) into vernacular Korean in South Korea (1960) and North Korea (1966). Looking beyond the classical paradigm of interlingual and intralingual translation as “translation proper” and “rewording,” respectively, the article argues that translations of classical Korean fiction from Literary Sinitic into vernacular Korean represented a form of transitional intralingual translation as each nation navigated away from active membership in the Sinographic Cosmopolis and attempted to establish a new national literature and literary medium. Whereas the South Korean translation is tethered closely to the Literary Sinitic original in terms of lexicon, orthography, and representation of classical allusions and perpetuates three tiers of literacy, the North Korean translation hews much more closely to spoken vernacular and traditional kungmun manuscript versions of classical fiction and embodies the overriding North Korean policy of sinograph abolition and han'gŭl promotion.

참고문헌 (45)

  1. "Puk Han yŏn’gu hakhoebo", 2000, 293~317
  2. "Ko sosŏl yŏn’gu", 2009, 71~103
  3. "MA", Tongguk University, 2019
  4. Chosŏn ŏmun yŏn’guhoe, (1948), Chosŏn ŏmun yŏn’guhoe
  5. Chosŏnŏ hakhoe, (1933), Chosŏnŏ hakhoe
  6. "Tonga Ilbo", 1946
  7. Gale, James Scarth, "Redemption and Regret: Modernizing Korea in the Writings of James Scarth Gale", pp.562~624 (2021), University of Toronto Press
  8. Han Chinsik, (1966), Chosŏn munhak yesul ch’ong tongmaeng ch’ulp’ansa
  9. "Hyŏndae munhak iron yŏn’gu", 2007, 315~345
  10. Jakobson, Roman, "The Translation Studies Reader", pp.113~118 (2000), Routledge
  11. Kim Hamyŏng, (1966), Chosŏn munhak yesul ch’ong tongmaeng ch’ulp’ansa
  12. "Munhwaŏ haksŭp", 1968, 2~8
  13. Kim Ilsŏng, (1979), Chosŏn rodongdang ch’ulp’ansa
  14. "Ŏmun nonch’ong", 1972, 47~61
  15. Immanuel Kim, "Beyond Axis of Evil: Teaching North Korean Literature at an American University", 비교한국학 Comparative Korean Studies, 21(2), pp.103~132 (2013), 국제비교한국학회
  16. "Chayu munhak", 1960, 257~258
  17. "Chayu munhak", 1960, 258~269
  18. "Chayu munhak", 1960, 262~270
  19. "Chayu munhak", 1960, 252~259
  20. "Chayu munhak", 1960, 251~259
  21. Kim, Suzy, "Everyday Life in the North Korean Revolution, 1945–1950" (2016), Cornell University Press
  22. Kim Tonguk, (1978), Posŏng munhwasa
  23. King, Ross, "Korea Briefing: Toward Reunification", pp.109~144 (1997), M. E. Sharpe
  24. King, Ross, "Language and National Identity in Asia", pp.200~234 (2007), Oxford University Press
  25. King, Ross, "The Politics of Language: Sinitic Scripts in Asia since 1900" (1900), Brill
  26. "Ŏhak yŏn’gu", 1992, 429~444
  27. "Munhwaŏ haksŭp", 1968, 9~13
  28. Ŏm T’aesik, (2015), Tosŏ ch’ulp’an wŏrin
  29. "Kugŏ kungmunhak", 1987, 163~184
  30. "Kugŏ kyoyuk", 1980, 81~94
  31. Pettid, Michael, "Unyŏng-jŏn: A Love Affair at the Royal Palace of Chosŏn Korea" (2009), Center for Korean Studies, Institute of East Asian Studies
  32. Shuttleworth, Marc, "Dictionary of Translation Studies" (1997), St. Jerome
  33. Yang Sŭngmin, (2008), Asea munhwasa
  34. 이진숙, "근대 초기 고소설 영역본의 번역용례 연구: J. S. 게일의 미간행 『운영전 영역본』을 중심으로", 코기토, 87, pp.161~199 (2019), 인문학연구소[DOI]
  35. "Kososŏl yŏn’gu", 1998, 133~176
  36. "Tonga ilbo", 1949
  37. Zethsen, Karen Korning, "Intralingual Translation: An Attempt at Description", Meta, 54(4), pp.795~812 (2009)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)