Comparison of the Valuation of Technology Firms in KOSPI and KOSDAQ
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to compare the valuation of technology firms in the KOSPI and KOSDAQ. This study analyzed 224 market reports for KOSDAQ firms and 602 reports for KOSPI firms. We compare the two markets under 3 definitions on the accuracy of stock price forecasting. Findings are as follows: Although PER multiples is the most used method of valuation, KOSDAQ valuation more heavily relies on the method than KOSPI valuation. In stock market, the period of earnings forecasting is mostly 2-3 years. Multiples of KOSDAQ is generally higher than those of KOSPI. Even for technology firms, valuation in KOSPI mostly relies on earnings of the company, but that in KOSDAQ mostly relies on relative price. In stock price forecasting, generally overestimation prevails. Moreover, forecasting of KOSPI reports is more accurate than that of KOSDAQ reports. ROE and COE of KOSDAQ firms are generally higher than those of KOSPI firms.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to compare the valuation of technology firms in the KOSPI and KOSDAQ. This study analyzed 224 market reports for KOSDAQ firms and 602 reports for KOSPI firms. We compare the two markets under 3 definitions on the accuracy of stock price forecasting. Findings are as follows: Although PER multiples is the most used method of valuation, KOSDAQ valuation more heavily relies on the method than KOSPI valuation. In stock market, the period of earnings forecasting is mostly 2-3 years. Multiples of KOSDAQ is generally higher than those of KOSPI. Even for technology firms, valuation in KOSPI mostly relies on earnings of the company, but that in KOSDAQ mostly relies on relative price. In stock price forecasting, generally overestimation prevails. Moreover, forecasting of KOSPI reports is more accurate than that of KOSDAQ reports. ROE and COE of KOSDAQ firms are generally higher than those of KOSPI firms.
참고문헌 (36)
- Ahn, Y. Y., "The determinants of analyst reputation, the relations between analyst reputation and performance: an analysis of best-analyst", Conference of Korea Accounting Association, pp.81~107 (2005)
- 백원선, "정보통신기술기업과 비금융제조기업간 차별적 주가결정요인", 회계학연구, 28(2), pp.49~74 (2003), 한국회계학회
- Bartov, E., "Valuation of internet stocks-an IPO perspective", Journal of Accounting Research, 40(2), pp.321~346 (2002)
- Bradshaw, M.T., "Do sell-side analysts exhibit differential target price forecasting ability?", Review of Accounting Studies, 18, pp.930~955 (2013)
- Brav, A., "An empirical analysis of analysts' target prices: short-term informativeness and long-term dynamics", Journal of Finance, 58(5), pp.1933~1967 (2003)
- 조기헌, "Market Valuation of Technology Firms in KOSDAQ", Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy, 3(2), pp.172~192 (2014), 아시아기술혁신학회[DOI]
- Clement, M. B., "Analyst forecast accuracy: do ability, resources, and portfolio complexity matter?", Journal of Accounting Economics, 27(3), pp.285~303 (1999)
- Daa, Z., "Relative valuation and analyst target price forecasts", Journal of Financial Markets, 14(1), pp.161~192 (2011)
- Feltham, G.A., "Valuation and clean surplus accounting for operating and financial activities", Contemporary Accounting Research, 11(2), pp.689~731 (1995)
- Valuation Using Multiples: How Do Analysts Reach their Conclusion?, "Fernandez, P.", IESE Business School, University of Navarra, ~ (2001)
- Gleason, W., "Valuation model use and the price target performance of sell-side equity analysts", Contemporary Accounting Research, 30(1), pp.80~115 (2013)
- Goldenberg, D., "Why entrepreneurs and VCs disagree in valuing start-up firms: imputing the target rate of return using DCF vs. option-based approaches", Journal of Private Equity, 13(1), pp.73~79 (2009)[DOI]
- On the Performance of Cyclically Adjusted Valuation Measures, "Gray, W.R.", Social Science Research Network, ~ (2013)
- Hong, D.H., "Analysts, investment recommendations, target price", Spring Conference of Korea Aeronautics Association, pp.61~68 (2012)
- Jacob, J., "Expertise in forecasting performance of security analysts", Journal of Accounting and Economics, 28(1), pp.51~82 (1999)
- Jeffrey, L.C., "Empirical tests of the Feltham-Ohlson (1995) model", Review of Accounting Studies, 10(4), pp.409~429 (2005)
- 주병철, "실물옵션을 이용한 코스닥 벤처기업의 가치평가", 산업경제연구, 24(2), pp.1027~1048 (2011), 한국산업경제학회
- 강일주, "주가배수 평가기법을 이용한 주식가치평가의 정확성에 대한 실증분석", 회계저널, 21(1), pp.237~257 (2012), 한국회계학회
- 김동순, "애널리스트 이익예측의 정확성 및 분산 -하이테크 및 로우테크 기업의 비교-", 기업경영연구, 18(1), pp.127~141 (2011), 한국기업경영학회
- 김동환, "비교분석 방법에 의한 벤처기업의 가치평가", 대한경영학회지, 17(6), pp.2623~2646 (2004), 대한경영학회
- 김문철, "애널리스트 목표주가 예측능력의 지속성 및 주가반응에 관한 연구", 세무와회계저널, 12(2), pp.43~73 (2011), 한국세무학회
- Kim, S.K., "The valuation of KOSDAQ venture companies using real options", The 2000 Autumn Conference of Korea Technology Innovation Society, pp.11~ (2000)
- 이동수, "블랙숄즈모형을 적용한 태양광 핵심소재 기술가치평가 : 기업사례를 중심으로", 기술혁신학회지, 14(3), pp.578~598 (2011), 한국기술혁신학회
- 이종천, "기업특성에 따른 기업가치평가모형의 적합성 차이에 관한 연구: 코스닥 일반기업과 벤처기업을 중심으로", 회계학연구, 29(2), pp.157~186 (2004), 한국회계학회
- 이원흠, "주가배수 평가모형과 저PER, 저PBR 효과에 관한 실증연구", Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies, 31, pp.109~150 (2002), 한국증권학회
- Liu, J., "The Feltham-Ohlson (1995) model: Empirical implications", Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 15(3), pp.321~331 (2000)
- Luehrman, T. A., "Investment opportunities as real options: getting started on the numbers", Harvard Business Review, 76(4), pp.51~67 (1998)
- Messica, A., "The valuation of cash-flowless high-risk ventures", The Journal of Private Equity, 11(2), pp.43~48 (2008)[DOI]
- Mikhail, M.B., "Do security analysts improve their performance with experience?", Journal of Accounting Research, 35, pp.131~166 (1997)
- Ohlson, J.A., "Earnings, book values, and dividends in equity valuation", Contemporary Accounting Research, 11(2), pp.661~687 (1995)
- 오종문, "유사상장법인 비교평가법 연구", 세무학연구, 28(3), pp.37~70 (2011), 한국세무학회
- 오종문, "보충적 평가법에서 주가배수와 평가가치의 가중치", 세무학연구, 29(4), pp.371~408 (2012), 한국세무학회
- 오종문, "주가배수평가모형에서 오차율의 편의와 효율성", 세무와회계저널, 14(1), pp.31~62 (2013), 한국세무학회
- Penman, S., "A comparison of dividend, cash flow, and earnings approaches to equity valuation", Contemporary Accounting Research, 15(3), pp.343~383 (1998)[DOI]
- Saito, Y., "The demand for accounting information: young NASDAQ listings versus S&P 500 NYSE listings", Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 38(2), pp.149~175 (2012)
- 설성수, "기술 및 투자 가치평가를 위한 실무형 실물옵션", 기술혁신학회지, 5(1), pp.44~58 (2002), 한국기술혁신학회