Market Valuation of Technology Firms in KOSDAQ
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aims to analyze the valuation of technology firms in the stock market to answer how before-market entities should be valuated. This study analyzes 230 market reports of 2012 for technology firms in the KOSDAQ under several hypotheses. The results are as follows: 90% used the 3 multiples methods consisting of PER multiples with 80%, PBR multiples 8.7% and EBITDA multiples 1.7%. The average of PER multiples was 15 with the range of 6.9 to 83. That of PBR multiples is 2.27. Forecasting for cash flow is not applied over 4 years, but mainly 2-3 years. The accuracy of forecasting was 18.8%, 34.4% and 8% according to the different definitions. No differences were found in the accuracy of forecasting between valuation methods, between the industries having more intangible assets and the industries having less, and between startups and general companies and between ages and listed ages.
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the valuation of technology firms in the stock market to answer how before-market entities should be valuated. This study analyzes 230 market reports of 2012 for technology firms in the KOSDAQ under several hypotheses. The results are as follows: 90% used the 3 multiples methods consisting of PER multiples with 80%, PBR multiples 8.7% and EBITDA multiples 1.7%. The average of PER multiples was 15 with the range of 6.9 to 83. That of PBR multiples is 2.27. Forecasting for cash flow is not applied over 4 years, but mainly 2-3 years. The accuracy of forecasting was 18.8%, 34.4% and 8% according to the different definitions. No differences were found in the accuracy of forecasting between valuation methods, between the industries having more intangible assets and the industries having less, and between startups and general companies and between ages and listed ages.
참고문헌 (30)
- Ahn, Y.Y, "Relationship between Reputation and Performance of Financial Analysts and Determinants of Reputation: An Analysis of Best Analysts", Proceedings for Conference of Korea Accounting Association, pp.81~107 (2005)
- Baek, W.S, "Determinants of price differentiation between ICT firms and non-financial manufacturing", Accounting Studies, 28(2), pp.49~74 (2003)
- Do Sell-Side Analysts Exhibit Differential Target Price Forecasting Ability, "Bradshaw, M.T", Working Paper, Harvard Business School, ~ (2006)
- Brav, A, "An empirical analysis of analysts' target prices: short-term informativeness and long-term dynamics", Journal of Finance, 58(5), pp.1933~1967 (2003)
- Clement, M.B, "Analyst forecast accuracy: do ability, resources, and portfolio complexity matter", Journal of Accounting Economics, 27(3), pp.285~303 (1999)
- Kang, I.J, "An empirical analysis on the accuracy of stock price valuation using multiples method", Journal of Accounting, 21(1), pp.237~257 (2012)
- Kim, D.H, "Valuation of startups using comparative analysis", Journal of the Korean Academic Association of Business Administration, 47, pp.2623~2646 (2004)
- 김동순, "애널리스트 이익예측의 정확성 및 분산 -하이테크 및 로우테크 기업의 비교-", 기업경영연구, 18(1), pp.127~141 (2011), 한국기업경영학회
- 김문철, "애널리스트 목표주가 예측능력의 지속성 및 주가반응에 관한 연구", 세무와회계저널, 12(2), pp.43~73 (2011), 한국세무학회
- Kim, S.G, "Valuation of KOSDAQ Startups Using Real Options", Korea Technology Innovation Society Conference, pp.11~ (2000)
- Jacob, J, "Expertise in forecasting performance of security analysts", Journal of Accounting and Economics, 28(1), pp.51~82 (1999)
- Feltham, G.A, "Valuation and clean surplus accounting for operating and financial activities", Contemporary Accounting Research, 11, pp.689~732 (1995)
- Valuation Model Use and the Price Target Performance of Sell-Side Equity Analysts, "Gleason, W", Working Paper, University of Iowa, ~ (2008)
- Valuation Using Multiples: How Do Analysts Reach Their Conclusion?, "Fernandez, P", SSRN, ~, pp.Working Paper, 6 (2001)
- Fernandez, P, "Market risk premium used in 88 countries in 2014: A survey with 8,228 answers", IESE Business School, ~ (2014)
- Hong, D.H, "Accuracy of Analysts’ Forecast in Aviation Industry and Investment Performance", Proceedings for Spring Conference, pp.61~68 (2012), Aviation Management Society of Korea
- Jeffrey, L.C, "Empirical tests of the Feltham–Ohlson (1995) Model", Review of Accounting Studies, 10, pp.409~429 (2005)
- 주병철, "실물옵션을 이용한 코스닥 벤처기업의 가치평가", 산업경제연구, 24(2), pp.1027~1048 (2011), 한국산업경제학회
- 이동수, "블랙숄즈모형을 적용한 태양광 핵심소재 기술가치평가 : 기업사례를 중심으로", 기술혁신학회지, 14(3), pp.578~598 (2011), 한국기술혁신학회
- Lee, J.C, "On differences in explanatory power (propriety, fitness, validity) of alternative equity valuation models depending on a firm’s characteristics: focusing on venture and non-venture firms of KOSDAQ", Journal of Accounting Research, 29(2), pp.157~185 (2004)
- Lee, W.H, "An empirical study of the low-PER, low-PBR and high-VAM effects based on price multiple valuation models", Korean Journal of Financial Studies, 31, pp.109~149 (2002)
- Liu, J, "The Feltham–Ohlson (1995) Model: empirical implications", Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 15, pp.321~331 (2000)
- Luehrman, T.A, "Investment opportunities as real option: getting started on the numbers", Harvard Business Review, pp.1~14 (1998)
- Mikhail, M.B, "Do security analysts improve their performance with experience", Journal of Accounting Research, 35, pp.131~166 (1997)
- Ohlson, J.A, "Earnings, book values, and dividends in security valuation", Contemporary Accounting Research, 11(2), pp.661~687 (1995)
- 오종문, "주가배수평가모형에서 오차율의 편의와 효율성", 세무와회계저널, 14(1), pp.31~62 (2013), 한국세무학회
- 오종문, "보충적 평가법에서 주가배수와 평가가치의 가중치", 세무학연구, 29(4), pp.371~408 (2012), 한국세무학회
- 오종문, "유사상장법인 비교평가법 연구", 세무학연구, 28(3), pp.37~70 (2011), 한국세무학회
- 설성수, "기술 및 투자 가치평가를 위한 실무형 실물옵션", 기술혁신학회지, 5(1), pp.44~58 (2002), 한국기술혁신학회
- Seol, S.S, "Valuation of Technology" (2012), Bommunsa