Measurement of Public Research Outcomes: A Technology Valuation Method
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article proposes a logic model for assessing the performance of the outcome of public research as a technology valuation method. It consists of two parts and eight steps. The first part is a scoring system and the second part is a validation process of the performance index derived from scoring by valuation method. The scoring in the first part generally requires a focus group method to find out the value drivers and make an evaluation table. The reason why we call it the technology valuation method is that the first part is derived from the simple evaluation of technology value using checklists for value drive. The second part is the regular technology valuation process. The model is designed for the measurement of unquantifiable outcome. Is knowledge or scientific outcome comparable to the measured outcome? If possible, how big is the unquantifiable outcome? This model is based on financial valuation techniques with clear or acceptable market data. Therefore, it cannot work solely for unquantifiable outcomes without comparable measurable outcomes, unlike economic valuation.
Abstract
This article proposes a logic model for assessing the performance of the outcome of public research as a technology valuation method. It consists of two parts and eight steps. The first part is a scoring system and the second part is a validation process of the performance index derived from scoring by valuation method. The scoring in the first part generally requires a focus group method to find out the value drivers and make an evaluation table. The reason why we call it the technology valuation method is that the first part is derived from the simple evaluation of technology value using checklists for value drive. The second part is the regular technology valuation process. The model is designed for the measurement of unquantifiable outcome. Is knowledge or scientific outcome comparable to the measured outcome? If possible, how big is the unquantifiable outcome? This model is based on financial valuation techniques with clear or acceptable market data. Therefore, it cannot work solely for unquantifiable outcomes without comparable measurable outcomes, unlike economic valuation.
참고문헌 (41)
- Alexander, D., "Valuations of Intangibles, Institute on Federal Taxation" (1962), New York University
- Boer, P. F., "Valuation of Technology: Business and Financial Issues in R&D" (1999), Wiley and Sons
- Boer, P.F., "Valuation of technology using real options", Research Technology Management, pp.26~30 (2000)
- Public Value Mapping of Science Outcomes: Theory and Method, School of Public Policy, "Bozeman, B.", Georgia Tech, ~ (2003)
- Barry Bozeman, "R&D value mapping: A new approach to case study-based evaluation", The Journal of Technology Transfer, 22(2), pp.33~41 (1997), Springer Nature[DOI]
- Barry Bozeman, "Public Value Mapping and Science Policy Evaluation", Minerva, 49(1), pp.1~23 (2011), Springer Nature[DOI]
- Brown, M.G., "Measuring R&D productivity", Research Technology Management, 31(4), pp.11~15 (1988)
- Brown, M.G., "Research Technology Management", Research Evaluation, 41, pp.30~35 (1988), Oxford University Press (OUP)[DOI]
- Donovan, C., "The ‘Payback Framework’ explained", Research Evaluation, 20(3), pp.181~183 (2011)
- Faulkner, T.W., "Appling options thinking to R&D valuation", Research Technology Management, pp.50~56 (1996)
- Nutrition Labels and Health Claims: The Global Regulatory Environment, "Hawkes, C.", WHO, ~ (2004)
- Agricultural Research Impact Assessment: Issues, Methods and Challenges, "Joly, P. B.", OECD, ~ (2016)
- 김건하, "Valuation of the stabilization plan for the foot-and-mouth disease burial sites", Environmental Engineering Research, 20(1), pp.59~63 (2015), 대한환경공학회[DOI]
- Kostoff, R.N., "The Handbook of Research Impact Assessment", Office of Naval Research, ~ (1994)
- A study on the establishment of strategic functions of Korea Food Research Institute, "Kwak, C.G.", ~ (2012)
- Lee, K.H., "A comparison of commercial practices on the valuation of intangibles", Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 5(2) (2002)
- McLaughlin, J.A., "Logic models: a tool for telling your program’s performance story", Evaluation and Program Planning, 22(1), pp.65~72 (1999)
- Mitchell, G.R., "Managing R&D as a strategic option", Research Technology Management, pp.15~22 (1988)
- Nichols, N., "Scientific management at merck: an interview with CFO Judy Lewent", Harvard Business Review, pp.88~99 (1994)
- Categorizing the measures and evaluation methods of R&D performance - A state-of-the-art review on R&D performance analysis, "Ojanen, V.", Telecom Business Research Center Lappeenranta, Lappeenranta University of Technology, ~, pp.Working Papers 16 (2003)
- Ottoo, R.E., "‘Valuation of internal growth opportunities: the case of a biotechnology company’ the quarterly review of economics and finance", 38, pp.615~633 (1998)
- Pappas, R.A., "Measuring R&D productivity", Research Management, 28(3), pp.15~22 (1985)
- Parish, T.D., "Assessing the Value of Research in the Chemical Sciences", pp.50~125 (1998)
- 박정민, "인간유전체 기능연구사업의 실물옵션 가치평가 비교", 기술혁신학회지, 9(1), pp.84~102 (2006), 한국기술혁신학회
- Park, S.M., "Handbook on R&D Performance Evaluation" (2011), Korea Studies Information Co
- Patterson, W.C., "Evaluating R&D performance at Alchore Labs", Research Management, 3 (1983)
- Ranftl, R.M., "R&D Productivity" (1974), Hughes Aircraft Company
- Bridging From Project Case Study to Portfolio Analysis in a Public R&D Program: A Framework for Evaluation and Introduction to a Composite Performance Rating System, "Ruegg, R.", National Institute of Standards and Technology, ~ (2006)
- A Toolkit for Evaluating Public R&D Investment: Models, Methods, and Findings from ATP’s First Decade (grant, "contract report)", Ruegg, R., 2003
- Schumann, Jr. P.A., "Measuring R&D performance", Research Technology Management, 38(3), pp.45~54 (1995)
- 설성수, "기술 및 투자 가치평가를 위한 실무형 실물옵션", 기술혁신학회지, 5(1), pp.44~58 (2002), 한국기술혁신학회
- 설성수, "기술시장분석 체크리스트", 기술혁신학회지, 5(3), pp.277~292 (2002), 한국기술혁신학회
- Seol, S.S., "An analysis of the conceptual framework of valuation of technology", Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 3(1), pp.5~21 (2000)
- Seol, S.S., "The concept and analysis of the valuation of technology", Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 3(2), pp.1~13 (2000)
- Seol, S.S., "Some professional issues on the valuation of technology", International Journal of Technology Marketing, 5(2), pp.145~162 (2010)
- Seol, S.S., "Economic Effects of Korea Food Research Institute", Korea Valuation Association, ~ (2017)
- J. Spaapen, "Introducing 'productive interactions' in social impact assessment", Research Evaluation, 20(3), pp.211~218 (2011), Oxford University Press (OUP)[DOI]
- Szakonyi, R., "Measuring R&D effectiveness", Research Technology Management, 37(2), pp.27~32 (1994)
- Tipping, J.W., "Assessing the value of your technology", Research Technology Management, 38(5), pp.22~39 (1995)
- W. K. Kellogg Foundation, "W. K. Kellogg Foundation Logic Development Guide" (2004), MI Battle Creek
- Werner, B., "Measuring R&D performance-state of the art", Research Technology Management, 40(2), pp.34~42 (1997)