The Measurement and Evaluation of Technology Transfer Activities: Indicators for University and Research Institution
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Not surprisingly, there are many factors which affect technologytransfer activities of public research institutions. Therefore, to map outmore effective strategy for promoting technology transfer, we need a widerange of information related to technology transfer activities and alsoproper tool for evaluating and analyzing them. However, development ofcomprehensive indicators that can measure the level and capability oftechnology transfer activities by institution and utilization thereof havevirtually not been accomplished. In this context, we developed indicators tomeasure and analyze technology transfer capacities and performances ofuniversity and research institution. This paper presents structures andapplication results of Indicators for Evaluation of Technology TransferActivities(IETTA) and explores implications for promoting technologytransfer of public research institution. Especially, we group PRIs into 6categories by comparing the values of evaluation areas, and propose grouptailoredpolicies for each group. A data set from 181 PRIs with nonzeroR&D expenditures (including 116 universities) in Korea is studied. Resultsshow that IETTA can be an appropriate approach to better understandsubstantial variations across institutions in resources or capacities fortechnology transfer activities, and map out more effective strategy forpromoting technology transfer.
Abstract
Not surprisingly, there are many factors which affect technologytransfer activities of public research institutions. Therefore, to map outmore effective strategy for promoting technology transfer, we need a widerange of information related to technology transfer activities and alsoproper tool for evaluating and analyzing them. However, development ofcomprehensive indicators that can measure the level and capability oftechnology transfer activities by institution and utilization thereof havevirtually not been accomplished. In this context, we developed indicators tomeasure and analyze technology transfer capacities and performances ofuniversity and research institution. This paper presents structures andapplication results of Indicators for Evaluation of Technology TransferActivities(IETTA) and explores implications for promoting technologytransfer of public research institution. Especially, we group PRIs into 6categories by comparing the values of evaluation areas, and propose grouptailoredpolicies for each group. A data set from 181 PRIs with nonzeroR&D expenditures (including 116 universities) in Korea is studied. Resultsshow that IETTA can be an appropriate approach to better understandsubstantial variations across institutions in resources or capacities fortechnology transfer activities, and map out more effective strategy forpromoting technology transfer.
참고문헌 (15)
- 최성호, "국가기술사업화지표 개발 방안 연구", 기술혁신학회지, 9(1), pp.26~51 (2006), 한국기술혁신학회
- 한동성, "SFA를 이용한 국내 대학 기술이전전담조직(TLO)의 기술이전 효율성 분석에 관한 연구", 한국기술혁신학회 학술대회 발표논문집 (2010)
- 이성상, "대학, 공공연구기관의 기술이전 효율성 변화와 효율성 결정요인 분석", 지식재산연구, 7(3), pp.163~185 (2012), 한국지식재산연구원
- Anderson, T. R., "Measuring the efficiency of university technology transfer", Technovation, 27(5) (2007)
- Carlsson, B., "Technology transfer in United States universities: A survey and statistical analysis", Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 12(1-2) (2002)
- Chapple, W., "Assessing the relative performance of UK university technology transfer offices: Parametric and non-parametric evidence", Research Policy, 34(3) (2005)
- Coccia, M., "Technology transfer analysis in the Italian National Research Council", Technovation, 22(5) (2002)
- Friedman, J., "University technology transfer: do incentives, management, and location matter?", The Journal of Technology Transfer, 28(1) (2003)
- Kim, Y. H., "The ivory tower approach to entrepreneurial linkage: productivity changes in university technology transfer", The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(2) (2013)
- Patel, P., "Patterns of internationalisation of corporate technology: location vs. home country advantages", Research policy, 28(2) (1999)
- Rogers, E.M., "Assessing the effectiveness of technology transfer offices at U.S. research universities", The Journal of the Association of University Technology Managers, 12(1) (2000)
- Siegel, D. S., "Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: Qualitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies", Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 21(1) (2004)
- Thursby, J. G., "Objectives, characteristics and outcomes of university licensing: a survey of major U.S. universities", The Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1-2) (2001)
- Thursby, J. G., "Growth and productivity efficiency of university intellectual property licensing", Research Policy, 31(1) (2002)
- Thursby, J. G., "Who is selling the Ivory Tower? Sources of growth in university licensing", Management Science, 48(1) (2002)