The use of Remigiu’s commentary on Donatus’s Ars minor in a Carolingian parsing grammar Magnus quae uox?
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Magnus quae uox? is a Carolingian parsing grammar written in the tenth or the eleventh century. It is a commentary on Donatus’s Ars maior and Ars minor, but is presented in the form of parsing questions and answers. Among the sources of Magnus quae uox? the use of Priscian’s Institutiones grammaticae and the commentaries on Donatus’s works by the scotti peregrini and Remigius of Auxerre is prominent. In particular, the use of Remigiu’s commentary on Donatus’s Ars minor is significant in that Magnus quae uox? follows closely Remigius’s style of commentary. Remigius’s commentary on Donatus’s Ars minor is different in style from the other commentaries used in Magnus quae uox? in that it retains the question- and-answer form of Donatus’s text. The classroom-like way of presentation seemed to have appealed to the author of Magnus quae uox? who was constructing his grammar using questions and answers.
Abstract
Magnus quae uox? is a Carolingian parsing grammar written in the tenth or the eleventh century. It is a commentary on Donatus’s Ars maior and Ars minor, but is presented in the form of parsing questions and answers. Among the sources of Magnus quae uox? the use of Priscian’s Institutiones grammaticae and the commentaries on Donatus’s works by the scotti peregrini and Remigius of Auxerre is prominent. In particular, the use of Remigiu’s commentary on Donatus’s Ars minor is significant in that Magnus quae uox? follows closely Remigius’s style of commentary. Remigius’s commentary on Donatus’s Ars minor is different in style from the other commentaries used in Magnus quae uox? in that it retains the question- and-answer form of Donatus’s text. The classroom-like way of presentation seemed to have appealed to the author of Magnus quae uox? who was constructing his grammar using questions and answers.
참고문헌 (18)
- Donatus, "Ars grammaticae, In Donat et la tradition de l’enseignement grammatical" (1981)
- "Magnus quae uox?, Unprinted grammar in Munich", Bayerische Staatsbibliothek Clm, 157~183
- Pompeius, "Commentum artis Donati", GL, 95~312
- Priscian, "Institutiones grammaticae", GL Ⅱ and Ⅲ, 1~337
- Priscian, "Partitiones duodecim versuum Aeneidos principalium", GL, 457~515
- W. Fox, Leipizig, "Remigius of Auxerre, In artem Donati minorem commentum", GL, 202~218 (1902)
- Remigius of Auxerre, "In artem maiorem Donati commentum, GL VIII 219-274, supplemented by John Petersen Elder, ‘The missing portions of the Commentum Einsidlense on Donatus’s Ars grammatica’", Harvard Studies in Classical Philology, 56-57, pp.129~160 (1947)
- M. L. Coletti, "Un’opera grammaticale di Remigio di Auxerre: il commento al De barbarismo di Donato", Studi Medievali, 26, pp.951~967 (1985)
- B. Löfstedt, "The commentaries on Donatus by the scotti peregrini: Ars Laureshamensis", CCCM 40A, ~
- Murethach, "In Donati artem maiorem", CCCM 40, ~
- Sedulius Scottus, "In Donati artem maiorem", CCCM 40B, ~
- Sedulius Scottus, "In Donati artem minorem", CCCM 40C, 1~54
- Holtz, L., "Donat et la tradition de l’enseignement grammatical. Etude sur l’Ars Donati et sa diffusion (IVe-IXe siècle) et édition critique", ~ (1981)
- Kaster, R. A., "Guardians of Language" (1988), Berkeley
- Law, V., "Grammar and Grammarians in the Early Middle Ages" (1997)
- Lepschy, G., "History of Linguistics. Vol. II: Classical and Medieval Linguistics" (1994)
- H. Keil, "GL Grammatici Latini, 8 vols", Hildesheim, ~ (1961)
- "CCCM Corpus Christianorum Continuatio Medievalis", Turnhout, ~ (1966)