본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

창조적 문화 세대를 위한 고전문학 교수-학습의 설계 - 고전문학의 패러디 활동을 중심으로 -

Design of The Way to Teaching-Learning Classical Literature for Creative Cultural Generation - Concentring on the Parody of Korean Classic Literary Works -

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

The purpose of this study is to seek out an teaching-learning plan which can make contribution to the acceptance of classical literature’s cultivating students’ creativity or creativeness. Through several patterns of parody which creatively restructure classical literature, this study seeks out method which can arrive at the goal of communal dimension which is passing down cultural assets and at the goal of individual dimension which is enhancement of creativity or creativeness. For this purpose, this study investigates concept and educational meaning of parody and, based on data including the results of class assignments, goes through the process of approaching the reality. What is essentially required of parody is ‘critical distance.’ Parody exists between simple imitation of previous texts and traceless distance from them. It can also be said the pleasure of parody lies between familiarity and strangeness. That is, this pleasure can be divided into factors of ‘pleasure of communication’ and ‘double-take of recognition’. Classical literature has the advantage that the outcomes of parody possess distinct identity as the readers can easily find the objects of parody. This study looks into instruction-learning plan of classical literature based on parody by classifying it into two perspectives. In terms of understanding, this study looks into literal, inferential and critical thinking ability while, in terms of expression, it looks into ability to use allusion. It is expected that parody enhances not only understanding ability of learners but also expressive ability in classical literature education. Parody is a play through imitation. It’s a human instinct and pleasure of parody becomes the very basis for instruction-learning plan. Parody is deemed to be a method to promote voluntary participation of students in classical literature education.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to seek out an teaching-learning plan which can make contribution to the acceptance of classical literature’s cultivating students’ creativity or creativeness. Through several patterns of parody which creatively restructure classical literature, this study seeks out method which can arrive at the goal of communal dimension which is passing down cultural assets and at the goal of individual dimension which is enhancement of creativity or creativeness. For this purpose, this study investigates concept and educational meaning of parody and, based on data including the results of class assignments, goes through the process of approaching the reality. What is essentially required of parody is ‘critical distance.’ Parody exists between simple imitation of previous texts and traceless distance from them. It can also be said the pleasure of parody lies between familiarity and strangeness. That is, this pleasure can be divided into factors of ‘pleasure of communication’ and ‘double-take of recognition’. Classical literature has the advantage that the outcomes of parody possess distinct identity as the readers can easily find the objects of parody. This study looks into instruction-learning plan of classical literature based on parody by classifying it into two perspectives. In terms of understanding, this study looks into literal, inferential and critical thinking ability while, in terms of expression, it looks into ability to use allusion. It is expected that parody enhances not only understanding ability of learners but also expressive ability in classical literature education. Parody is a play through imitation. It’s a human instinct and pleasure of parody becomes the very basis for instruction-learning plan. Parody is deemed to be a method to promote voluntary participation of students in classical literature education.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. 김대행, "국어교육의 목표와 내용", 선청어문, 25, pp.31~51 (1997), 서울대 국어교육과
  2. 김동환, "국문학과 문화", pp.383~397 (2001), 월인
  3. 김상욱, "국어교육의 방향과 서사적 상상력", 문학교육학, (15), pp.11~42 (2004), 한국문학교육학회
  4. 김선민, "문학교육의 창의성에 관한 연구", 문학교육학, (13), pp.377~420 (2004), 한국문학교육학회
  5. 김정애, "역할극 수용을 통한〈흥보가〉의 문학치료적 전망과 현대적 재창조 방안", 겨레어문학, 27, pp.5~28 (2001), 겨레어문학회
  6. 김종률, "국어과 인지적 사고 영역의 체계화 연구", 국어교육, (145), pp.301~348 (2014), 한국어교육학회
  7. 김종철, "판소리의 정서와 미학" (1996), 역사비평사
  8. 김중신, "소설감상방법론 연구" (1995), 서울대출판부
  9. 김진희, "‘나’를 넘어 ‘경계’를 지우며 시 쓰기 -문정희 『남자를 위하여』, 백미혜 『에로스의 반지』, 김수영 『로빈슨 크루소를 생각하며, 술을』", 실천문학, (42), pp.286~304 (1996)
  10. 류수열, "조선 후기 시가의 사설 공유 현상과 작가성의 행방", 한국시가연구, 28, pp.155~181 (2010), 한국시가학회
  11. 류수열, "문학교육개론Ⅱ-실제 편" (2014), 역락
  12. 박찬욱, "소셜네트워크서비스(SNS)의 탐닉적 이용동기 및 확산에 관한 연구", 생산성논집, 27(2), pp.331~354 (2013), 한국생산성학회
  13. 조하연, "문학의 속성을 활용한 창의적 사고의 교육 방안 연구 -낯설게하기(defamiliarization)를 중심으로", 국어교육학연구, (16) (2003), 국어교육학회
  14. 조하연, "鑑賞'의 개념 정립을 위한 小考", 문학교육학, (15), pp.377~412 (2004), 한국문학교육학회
  15. 차봉희, "수용미학" (1992), 고려원
  16. 최미숙, "문학적 글쓰기에 있어서의 '창조성'", 문학교육학, (15), pp.83~106 (2004), 한국문학교육학회
  17. 최인자, "아동기와 청소년기, 문학 창작 경험의 발달 특성에 관한 시론", 문학교육학, (15), pp.43~82 (2004), 한국문학교육학회
  18. 최홍원, "고전시가의 패러디를 통한 창의성 교육의 실제와 과제", 한어문교육, 24, pp.5~36 (2011), 한국언어문학교육학회
  19. Cox, Brian, "Cox on cox: An English Curriculum for the 1990s" (1991), Hodders & Stoughton
  20. Hutcheon, Linda, "패러디 이론" (1992), 문예출판사

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)