가족 의사소통에 대한 구성원들의 인식 연구 - 대학생 자녀를 둔 가정을 중심으로 -
Study on Family Members’ Perception about Family Communication : Focused on Undergraduate Students’ Family
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study, in order to investigate the perspectives on family communication between children and parents, had conducted a survey and after the completion of the survey analysis carried out interviews in writing targeting some of university students as children. For questionnaires, FACES III, a tool widely used for measuring family adaptability and family cohesion, was translated and used. This tool can measure the difference of ‘perspectives on everyday family conversation’, ‘perspectives on ideal family conversation’ and ‘the difference between day-to-day and ideal family conversation’, between parents and children. From 49 families with university students as their children participated in the survey, responses of 49 children, 30 fathers and 38 mothers were finally analyzed. The analysis result on ‘family cohesion’ and ‘family adaptability’ on day -to-day and ideal conversation between parents and children was as follows: Overall, response average of parents on ‘family cohesion’ and ‘family adaptability’ was higher than that of children. The comparison of response differences between parents and children on day-to-day family conversion showed its significance in areas of ‘control’, ‘discipline‘ and ‘family adaptability average’. The comparison of response differences between parents and children on ideal family conversion showed its significance in areas of ‘emotional bonding’, ‘maintaining of family boundaries’, activity sharing and event participation’ and ‘family cohesion average’. Next, from the analysis of response differences on participants’ day- to-day and ideal family conversation, the response differences between day-to-day and ideal family conversation in 16 questionnaires out of 20 were significant. This could be interpreted as that all participants were expected to get ready for flexibility and autonomy of communication with more securing unity and solidarity between family members than the current family conversation. Finally, on the basis of family members’ responses, family system types were analyzed. Focused on children’s responses, classifying family communication types showed 24 balanced, 11 middle-range and 14 extreme family types. However, mother’s responses showed more middle-range than balanced family types, which means inconsistency between family members. And the result of detail investigation on how much consistent family system types of members were by family was that the consistent cases of family system type between members out of 49 families were 21 and inconsistent cases 28. Also, in the aspect of consistency between couples in family system types, there were 11 inconsistent cases, more than 8 consistent cases.
Abstract
This study, in order to investigate the perspectives on family communication between children and parents, had conducted a survey and after the completion of the survey analysis carried out interviews in writing targeting some of university students as children. For questionnaires, FACES III, a tool widely used for measuring family adaptability and family cohesion, was translated and used. This tool can measure the difference of ‘perspectives on everyday family conversation’, ‘perspectives on ideal family conversation’ and ‘the difference between day-to-day and ideal family conversation’, between parents and children. From 49 families with university students as their children participated in the survey, responses of 49 children, 30 fathers and 38 mothers were finally analyzed. The analysis result on ‘family cohesion’ and ‘family adaptability’ on day -to-day and ideal conversation between parents and children was as follows: Overall, response average of parents on ‘family cohesion’ and ‘family adaptability’ was higher than that of children. The comparison of response differences between parents and children on day-to-day family conversion showed its significance in areas of ‘control’, ‘discipline‘ and ‘family adaptability average’. The comparison of response differences between parents and children on ideal family conversion showed its significance in areas of ‘emotional bonding’, ‘maintaining of family boundaries’, activity sharing and event participation’ and ‘family cohesion average’. Next, from the analysis of response differences on participants’ day- to-day and ideal family conversation, the response differences between day-to-day and ideal family conversation in 16 questionnaires out of 20 were significant. This could be interpreted as that all participants were expected to get ready for flexibility and autonomy of communication with more securing unity and solidarity between family members than the current family conversation. Finally, on the basis of family members’ responses, family system types were analyzed. Focused on children’s responses, classifying family communication types showed 24 balanced, 11 middle-range and 14 extreme family types. However, mother’s responses showed more middle-range than balanced family types, which means inconsistency between family members. And the result of detail investigation on how much consistent family system types of members were by family was that the consistent cases of family system type between members out of 49 families were 21 and inconsistent cases 28. Also, in the aspect of consistency between couples in family system types, there were 11 inconsistent cases, more than 8 consistent cases.
참고문헌 (38)
- 김병길, "한미 대학생의 가족 커뮤니케이션 패턴과 부모와의 만족도 차이에 관한 연구: RFCP를 중심으로", 스피치와 커뮤니케이션, (14), pp.95~125 (2010), 한국소통학회
- 김선희, "부모-자녀 의사소통이 우울감에 미치는 영향 : 정서인식의 명확성과 정서조절양식을 매개로", 석사, 심리학, pp.2009
- 김수아, "대학생이 지각한 가족체계유형에 따른 자아분화 정도 및 의사결정의 관계", 석사, 결혼·가족상담학, pp.2003
- 김수지, "대학생이 지각한 가족체계와 대학생활적응에 관한 연구", 석사, 가정교육전공, pp.2012
- 김윤정, "초등학교 저학년 자녀를 둔부모－자녀 간 의사소통 양상 분석", 청람어문교육, (53), pp.183~230 (2015), 청람어문교육학회
- 김지희, "대학생 자녀와 부모의 의사소통 증진 방안 연구 - 일상 대화 분석을 중심으로 -", 화법연구, (28), pp.1~36 (2015), 한국화법학회
- 김현주, "부모-자녀 의사소통 및 기본 심리적 욕구 척도 개발을 통한 청소년 안녕감 설명 변인 연구", 박사, 교육심리및교육과정, pp.2010
- 김희수, "청소년이 지각한 부모-자녀간의 의사소통과 자기효능감 및 진로결정과의 관계", 한국청소년연구, 16(2), pp.37~65 (2005), 한국청소년정책연구원
- 나은영, "가족평등대화와 청소년의 인터넷 의존: 자기효능감과 가족갈등의 매개를 중심으로", 사이버커뮤니케이션학보, 26(4), pp.5~49 (2009), 사이버커뮤니케이션학회
- 백목원, "다문화 가정 어머니와 자녀 간 의사소통 양상 연구", 한국초등국어교육, (57), pp.45~92 (2015), 한국초등국어교육학회
- 안경숙, "대학생들이 지각한 가족응집성, 가족적응성과 자아존중감 간의 관계", 석사, 가족학, pp.2006
- 오윤경, "부모-자녀 간 의사소통과 청소년 비행성향에 관한 연구", 석사, 일반사회교육, pp.2011
- 오윤선, "대학생이 지각한 가족체계 유형 및 부모-자녀 간 의사소통이 자아존중감에 미치는 영향", 청소년학연구, 15(5), pp.23~49 (2008), 한국청소년학회
- 유혜정, "청소년 자녀와 부모간 의사소통 개선을 위한 교수학습 과정안과 실제 상황적 수행평가 개발 및 적용 - 부모자녀의 실제대화 UCC동영상을 활용한 대화분석을 토대로 -", 한국가정과교육학회지, 23(3), pp.139~160 (2011), 한국가정과교육학회
- 이숙현, "가족체계 유형과 부모-자녀간의 의사소통", 생활과학논집, 6, pp.215~226 (1992), 연세대학교 생활과학연구소
- 이정숙, "한국 부모-자녀 대화의 소통 방식", 학습자중심교과교육연구, 10(3), pp.343~372 (2010), 학습자중심교과교육학회
- 이지헌, "국민 40% “결혼 안 해도 괜찮다” 인식 급변", 연합뉴스 2015년 2월 21일자, ~ (2015)
- 이화자, "경험적 부부집단치료 프로그램의 개발과 효과성 검증 : Satir성장모델과 비폭력대화(NVC)모델의 통합", 박사, 가족상담, pp.2009
- 이희자, "부모-자녀 간 의사소통과 청소년의 자아존중감 및 사회성 발달과의 관계", 한국생활과학회지, 9(3), pp.283~296 (2000)
- 장해순, "말하기, 듣기 스타일과 갈등관리유형 간의 관계", 한국방송학보, 21(1), pp.276~310 (2007), 한국방송학회
- 장해순, "부모-자녀 간 의사소통이 자녀의 자아존중감과 자기효능감에 미치는 영향", 커뮤니케이션학 연구, 13(2), pp.104~130 (2005), 한국커뮤니케이션학회
- 조재윤, "부모-자녀의 대화 방법 연구", 화법연구, 6, pp.9~34 (2003), 한국화법학회
- 최규련, "가족체계유형과 부모-자녀 간 의사소통이 청소년 자녀의 심리적 복지수준에 미치는 영향", 한국가족관계회지, 3(1), pp.120~142 (1998), 한국가족관계학회
- 최인경, "부모-자녀간 의사소통에 따른 청소년의 자아존중감", 석사, 가정관리학, pp.2001
- Barnes, H. L., "Family inventories: inventories used in a national survey of families across the family life cycle", pp.33~48 (1982), University of Minnesota
- Barnes, H. L., "Parent-adolescent communication and the circumplex model", Chid development, 56(2), pp.438~447 (1985)
- Chaffee, S. H., "Family communication and political socialization", Presented to the Theory and Methodology Division of the Association in Journalism Convention (1966)
- Draper, T. W., "Family variables" (1990), Sage
- Epstein, N. B., "The McMaster Model of Family Functioning", Journal of Marriage and Family Counseling, 4, pp.19~31 (1978)
- Fitzpatrick, M. A., "Sourcebook of family theories and methods： A contextual approach", pp.563~583 (1992), Plenum
- Gordon, T., "P.E.T. in Action" (1976), The Putnam Publishing
- Lee, K. S., "Validity and reliability of FACE S HI when applied two of family members", Korean Journal of Family Medicine, 17(7), pp.540~553 (1996)
- Lewis, J., "No single theread： Psychological health in family systems", pp.1976, Brunner
- Olson, D. H., "Circumplex model of marital and family systems: I. Cohesion and adaptability dimensions, family types, and clinical applications", Family Process, 18, pp.3~27 (1979)
- Olson, D. H., "Circumplex model of marital and family systems : VI. Theoretical update", Family Process, 22, pp.69~83 (1983)
- Ritchie, L. D., "Family communication patterns and the flow of information in the family", Paper Presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication (1988)
- Ritchie, L. D., "Family communication patterns measuring intrapersonal perceptions of interpersonal relationships", Communication Research, 17(4), pp.523~544 (1990)
- Rosenberg, M., "Nonviolent Communication： A Language of Life: Life-Changing Tools for Healthy Relationships" (2003), Puddle Dancer Press