배제의 논리로 구축된 ‘시조부흥론’ ―『조선문단』과 『동광』수록 시조를 중심으로

Abstract

By studying the distinctions and genealogy of those who published shijofrom the 1920s to 1930s, this research verifies that the phenomenon whichsaw a steep increase of shijo during this period is connected with thepublication of journals. In the 1920s, shijo tended to converge toward aspecific theme but in the 1930s the contents and techniques of the group ofcreative writers and shijo varied greatly with the increase of publication ofjournals. This research confirmed that the changes of media aroused by shijocontained within Choseonmundan and Donggwang extended the range ofcreative writers and the broad range of writers led to a variety of contents. The argument for Resurrection of shijo was established in the way ofexcluding the latter part of these three structures: National Literature/KAPFLiterature, shijo/Socialist Poetry, and shijo poets/lyric poets. However, in thepractical aspect of the creation of shijo, both values of aforementionedstructures coexisted. Even though distortions of the facts of creation of shijotook place due to the argument for Resurrection of shijo, shijo on the subjectof race and class, vagrancy and poverty, daily life and nature wereconsistently created. Because of this, shijo never devitalized and came to beKorea’s representative literature canon.