관형사의 어순
Word Orders of Korean Adnominals.
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to define the relative word orders of Korean adnominals. In order to accomplish this aim, I subclassify adnominals into nominal-adnominals and predicative-adnominals at first, then into the traditional subclassifications as demonstrative, numeric and attributive adnominals. I argue that my subclassification gives more accurate explanations for some exceptional word order problems among many adnominals which are not solved till now. That is, while nominal-adnominals have relatively fixed syntactic positions as demonstratives - numerics - attributives respectably in their order, predicative-adnominals are not the same as that. Some predicative-adnominals observe the relative word order, but others do not. They are free in their syntactic positions, and these kinds of adnominals also show peculiar syntactic behaves which are not mentioned till now. That is, they can be conjugated with adjectives, be replaced by proform, and be modified by adverbs. These extraordinary phenomena are explained also.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to define the relative word orders of Korean adnominals. In order to accomplish this aim, I subclassify adnominals into nominal-adnominals and predicative-adnominals at first, then into the traditional subclassifications as demonstrative, numeric and attributive adnominals. I argue that my subclassification gives more accurate explanations for some exceptional word order problems among many adnominals which are not solved till now. That is, while nominal-adnominals have relatively fixed syntactic positions as demonstratives - numerics - attributives respectably in their order, predicative-adnominals are not the same as that. Some predicative-adnominals observe the relative word order, but others do not. They are free in their syntactic positions, and these kinds of adnominals also show peculiar syntactic behaves which are not mentioned till now. That is, they can be conjugated with adjectives, be replaced by proform, and be modified by adverbs. These extraordinary phenomena are explained also.
참고문헌 (21)
- 강명윤, "DP와 국어의 명사구 - 지시사 ‘그’를 중심으로-", 한국어학, 13, pp.15~51 (2001), 한국어학회
- 고영근, "우리말 문법론" (2018), 집문당
- 고재설, "용언에서 기원한 관형사의 검토-관형사와 관형사형의 구분을 위하여-", 언어학 연구, (54), pp.39~63 (2020), 한국중원언어학회[DOI]
- 국립국어원, "표준국어 대사전" (1999), 두산동아
- 김선효, "현대 국어의 관형어 연구", 박사, 국어학, pp.2002
- 김정아, "중세국어의 비교구문 연구" (1998), 태학사
- 김주상, "용언 활용형에서 기원한 관형사 연구,", 국어연구, 217 (2010)
- 남기심, "표준 국어문법론" (2014), 탑출판사
- 서정수, "국어문법" (2006)
- 유창돈, "冠形詞史考究-李朝語語彙史-", 국어국문학, 30, pp.1~20 (1965)
- 이관규, "학교문법론" (2002), 월인
- 이규호, "관형사의 하위분류 - 인칭", 의문·부정 관형사의 설정 -, 2015, pp.(74), 207~232[DOI]
- 이수미, "새로운 유형의 관형사 설정에 관한 연구", 한말연구, (24), pp.165~194 (2009), 한말연구학회[DOI]
- 이익섭, "한국어 문법" (2005), 서울대학교 출판부
- 이익섭, "국어 문법론 강의" (2000), 학연사
- 이주행, "알기 쉬운 한국어 문법론" (2011), 역락
- 이현우, "현대 국어의 명사구의 구조 연구", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.1995
- 임홍빈, "국어 문법의 심층 2" (1998), 태학사
- 임홍빈, "국어 명사구와 조사구의 통사구조에 대하여", 관악어문연구, 24, pp.1~62 (1999)
- 최현배, "우리말본-열번째 고침" (1983), 정음문화사
- 황문환, "현대국어 관형사의 어휘사적 고찰", 한국문화, (29), pp.1~19 (2002), 규장각한국학연구원