본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

학문 목적 한국어 학습자 학술적 텍스트의 인용 동사 사용에서 드러나는 저자성 분석 -서론 및 이론적 논의 부분을 중심으로-

Analyzing Authorial Stance in Reporting Verbs: A Focus on Korean Learners' Academic Texts in the Introduction (IN) and Literature Review (LR)

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

This study investigates the usage patterns of reporting verbs in academic writing by learners in graduate schools in the fields of humanities and social sciences, focusing on the author's attitude toward the proposition conveyed through them. The authorial stance is the writer's attitude towards the proposition being communicated to the reader, distinguishing between stance (consent or disagreement) and engagement (the speaker's attitude toward the proposition). The analysis employs Martin & White's (2005) Appraisal Theory (AT) engagement system to explore the authorial stance. Specifically, the study contrasts the usage patterns of reporting verbs between learners and native speakers, concentrating on academic texts' introduction (IN) and literature review (LR) sections. These sections are chosen for their high activity, usage, and strategic importance of the 'quote' in conveying meaning. The paper underscores the importance of qualitative analysis in educational writing research and advocates for actively pursuing such studies. Furthermore, it highlights the necessity for constructing large-scale corpora to deepen insights into writing patterns and authorial stances in academic contexts.

Abstract

This study investigates the usage patterns of reporting verbs in academic writing by learners in graduate schools in the fields of humanities and social sciences, focusing on the author's attitude toward the proposition conveyed through them. The authorial stance is the writer's attitude towards the proposition being communicated to the reader, distinguishing between stance (consent or disagreement) and engagement (the speaker's attitude toward the proposition). The analysis employs Martin & White's (2005) Appraisal Theory (AT) engagement system to explore the authorial stance. Specifically, the study contrasts the usage patterns of reporting verbs between learners and native speakers, concentrating on academic texts' introduction (IN) and literature review (LR) sections. These sections are chosen for their high activity, usage, and strategic importance of the 'quote' in conveying meaning. The paper underscores the importance of qualitative analysis in educational writing research and advocates for actively pursuing such studies. Furthermore, it highlights the necessity for constructing large-scale corpora to deepen insights into writing patterns and authorial stances in academic contexts.

참고문헌 (38)

  1. 김병건, "한국 신문 보도문의 `개입(Engagement)' 표현에 대한 연구", 한말연구, 40, pp.33~61 (2016), 한말연구학회
  2. 공나형, "대통령의 공적 사과 담화에서 드러나는 `개입' 양상", 한국어 의미학, 76, pp.165~200 (2022), 한국어의미학회
  3. 공나형, "학문 목적 한국어 학습자의 작문에서 드러나는 개입 양상- 인문·사회 계열 중국인 학습자의 학술적 보고서 서론을 중심으로", 어문학, 152, pp.139~174 (2021), 한국어문학회
  4. 박수연, "한국어교육 학술텍스트의 인용 동사 연구 -I-M-R-D 구조의 학술 논문을 중심으로-", 외국어로서의한국어교육, 50, pp.31~58 (2018), 연세대학교 언어연구교육원 한국어학당
  5. 맹강, "중국인 한국어 학습자의 논증적 글쓰기 교육 연구-`개입'을 중심으로-", 박사, pp.2018
  6. 문숙영, "시제 어미 및 시제 상당 표현의 사용과 관련한 몇 문제", 한국어 의미학, 27, pp.45~73 (2008), 한국어의미학회
  7. 박지순, "학술 논문의 인용문 연구: 국어학 학술 논문 텍스트를 중심으로", 담화와 인지, 25(1), pp.81~100 (2018), 담화·인지언어학회
  8. 이관규, "체계기능언어학개관" (2021), 사회평론아카데미
  9. 이윤진, "`선행 연구 기술'의 주요 기능에 대한 연구-학문 목적 한국어 쓰기 지도를 목적으로-", 이중언어학, (54), pp.239~272 (2014), 이중언어학회
  10. 정유남, "한국어 발화 양태 동사의 의미 연구", 한국어 의미학, 40, pp.249~379 (2013), 한국어의미학회
  11. 조경순, "국어 발화동사 구문 연구", 한국어 의미학, 30, pp.289~312 (2009), 한국어의미학회
  12. 조경순, "발화동사 구문에 대한 연구 - 보고, 명령, 청구, 비하, 질책 행위를 중심으로 -", 한국어 의미학, 41, pp.141~167 (2013), 한국어의미학회
  13. 제민경, "텍스트의 장르성과 시간 표현 교육 - 신문 텍스트에서 `-었었-'과 `-ㄴ 바 있-' 의 선택을 중심으로 -", 텍스트언어학, 34, pp.179~206 (2013), 한국텍스트언어학회
  14. 진춘기, "인용동사 시상 표현의 사용 양상 및 담화 기능 분석 연구 -한국어 학술논문을 중심으로-", 이중언어학, (89), pp.299~335 (2022), 이중언어학회
  15. 탄나나, "한중 학술논문 서론 텍스트 구조의 장르분석적 연구 ─ 언어교육 분야의 학술논문을 대상으로 ─", 텍스트언어학, 47, pp.155~181 (2019), 한국텍스트언어학회
  16. Nicola Fraschini, "한국어와 이탈리아어 학술 논문의 텍스트 구조 비교 - 언어 교육분야 논문의 서론을 중심으로 -", 이탈리아어문학, 29, pp.289~316 (2010), 한국이탈리아어문학회
  17. Akindele, O., "A critical analysis of the literature review section of graduate dissertations at the University of Botswana", English for Specific Purposes World, 4(20), pp.1~20 (2008)
  18. Bednarek, M., "Evaluation in Media Discourse: Analysis of a Newspaper Corpus" (2006), Continuum
  19. Bitchener, J., "A Genre Approach to Understanding Empirically Based Thesis Writing", Supported through the Good Practice Publication Grant scheme. Published as part of the Good Practice Publication Grant, ~ (2009)
  20. Biber, D., "Stance in spoken and written university registers", Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5(2), pp.97~116 (2006)
  21. Bloch, J., "A concordance-based study of the use of reporting verbs as rhetorical devices in academic papers", Journal of Writing Research, 2(2), pp.219~244 (2010)
  22. Breivega, "Traces of self and others in research articles. Acomparative pilot study of English, French and Norwegian research articles in medicine, economics andlinguistics", International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(2), pp.218~239 (2002)
  23. Charles, M., "The construction of stance in reporting clauses: A cross-disciplinary study of theses", Applied Linguistics, 27(3), pp.492~518 (2006)
  24. Francis, G., "Collins COBULD Grammar Patterns 1: Verbs" (1996), Harper Collins
  25. Hyland, K., "Academic attribution: Citation and the construction of disciplinary knowledge", Applied Linguistics, 20(3), pp.341~367 (1999)
  26. Hyland, K., "Academic discourse", pp.115~130 (2002), Longman Pearson
  27. Hyland, K., "Analyzing academic writing: Contextualized frameworks", pp.5~23 (2004), Continuum
  28. Hyland, K., "Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse", Discourse Studies, 7(2), pp.173~192 (2005)
  29. Hyland, K., "Metadiscourse in Academic Writing : A Reappraisal", Applied Linguistics, 25, pp.156~177 (2004)
  30. Ivanic, R., "Writing and Identity: The Discoursal Construction of Identity in Academic Writing" (1998), John Benjamins
  31. Martin, J. R., "Researching Language in Schools and Communities", pp.275~302 (2000), Cassell
  32. Martin, J. R., "Working with Discourse: Meaning Beyond the Clause" (2007), Bloomsbury
  33. Martin, J., "The Language of Evaluation" (2005), Palgrave Macmillan
  34. Ridley, D., "The literature review. A step-by-step guide for students" (2007), Sage
  35. Samraj, B., "Form and function of citations in discussion sections of master's theses and research articles", Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12(4), pp.299~310 (2013)
  36. Swales, M., "Academic Writing for Graduate Students: Essential Tasks and Skills" (2012), University of Michigan Press
  37. Thompson, G., "Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse", pp.1~27 (2000), Oxford University Press
  38. Thompson, G., "Evaluation in the reporting verbs used in academic papers", Applied Linguistics, 12(4), pp.365~382 (1991)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)