본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

A Study on AI TOEIC Tutor: For English Learning by CEFR Proficiency Levels

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

This paper examines whether and to what extent an AI tutor affects TOEIC learning of English learners. For the study, a total of 110 students were recruited and randomly assigned to an AI tutor group (n = 57) and a human tutor group (n = 53). The study also investigates the difference in English proficiency among students in the two groups. Before the experiment, a TOEIC pre-test was administered. Based on the pre-test scores, participants were grouped into three CEFR proficiency levels: A1, A2, and B1. During the experimental period, the AI tutor group self-studied English with an AI tutor. The human tutor group took a traditional English class offered by a human tutor. After the experiment, a post-test was administered. The study found that the human tutor group increased their TOEIC test scores at all proficiency levels at the 5% significance level. On the other hand, the AI tutor group showed significant increases only at A1 and A2 levels. The group difference was statistically significant for the A1-level participants, indicating the superior effects of the AI tutor over the human tutor. On a basis of the findings, pedagogical implications are made.

Abstract

This paper examines whether and to what extent an AI tutor affects TOEIC learning of English learners. For the study, a total of 110 students were recruited and randomly assigned to an AI tutor group (n = 57) and a human tutor group (n = 53). The study also investigates the difference in English proficiency among students in the two groups. Before the experiment, a TOEIC pre-test was administered. Based on the pre-test scores, participants were grouped into three CEFR proficiency levels: A1, A2, and B1. During the experimental period, the AI tutor group self-studied English with an AI tutor. The human tutor group took a traditional English class offered by a human tutor. After the experiment, a post-test was administered. The study found that the human tutor group increased their TOEIC test scores at all proficiency levels at the 5% significance level. On the other hand, the AI tutor group showed significant increases only at A1 and A2 levels. The group difference was statistically significant for the A1-level participants, indicating the superior effects of the AI tutor over the human tutor. On a basis of the findings, pedagogical implications are made.

참고문헌 (42)

  1. Chinnery, G. M., "Going to the MALL: Mobile assisted language learning", Language Learning & Technology, 10(1), pp.9~16 (2006)
  2. Curtis, K. M, "Improving student attitudes: A study of a mathematics curriculum innovation", doctor, pp.2006
  3. Dörnyei, Z., "Research methods in applied linguistics" (2007), Oxford University Press
  4. Ellis, R., "Task-based research and language pedagogy", Language Teaching Research, 4(3), pp.193~220 (2000)[DOI]
  5. Gall, M., "Synthesis of research on teachers’ questioning", Educational Leadership, 42(3), pp.40~47 (1984)
  6. Hayashi, K., "CALL for Widening Participation: Short papers from EUROCALL 2020", pp.88~95 (2020), Research-publishing.net
  7. Hsieh, J. S. C., "Technological acceptance of LINE in flipped EFL oral training", Computers in Human Behavi, 70, pp.178~190 (2017)[DOI]
  8. Huang, W., "Chatbots for language learning : Are they really useful? A systematic review of chatbot-supported language learning", Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(1), pp.237~257 (2022)[DOI]
  9. Istrate, A. M., "The impact of the virtual assistant (VA) on language classes", Conference proceedings of eLearning and software for education, 15(1), pp.296~301 (2019), Carol I National Defence University Publishing House
  10. Jones, S., "The effect of the fourth industrial revolution on general English education", Korean Journal of General Education, 12(2), pp.169~197 (2018)
  11. Joshi, S., "Changing the learning paradigm re", innovation in today’s higher education in India, 2018, pp.7(4), 1705~1711
  12. Kanero, J., "Social robots for early language learning : Current evidence and future directions", Child Development Perspectives, 12(3), pp.146~151 (2018)[DOI]
  13. Kannan, J., "New trends in second language learning and teaching through the lens of ICT, networked learning, and artificial intelligence", Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación, 76, pp.13~30 (2018)[DOI]
  14. Keerthiwansha, N. W. B. S., "Artificial intelligence education (AIEd) in English as a second language (ESL) classroom in Sri Lanka", Artificial Intelligence, 6(1), pp.31~36 (2018)
  15. Kerr, P., "Adaptive learning", ELT Journal, 70(1), pp.88~93 (2016)[DOI]
  16. Kim, H. S., "Impact of mobile interactions with AI on writing performance", Modern English Education, 21(2), pp.1~13 (2020)[DOI]
  17. Kim, H. S., "Effects of AI chatbots on EFL students’ communication skills", Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics, 21, pp.712~734 (2021)[DOI]
  18. Kim, N. Y, "Effects of different voice-chat conditions on Korean EFL learners’ speaking ability, oral interaction, and affective factors", doctor, pp.2016
  19. Kim, N. Y., "A study on chatbots for developing Korean college students’ English listening and reading skills", Journal of Digital Convergence, 16(8), pp.19~26 (2018)[DOI]
  20. Kusumaningrum, M. A. D., "An intelligent tutoring system for learning listening TOEIC", Jurnal Berdaya Mandiri, 3(1), pp.456~467 (2021)[DOI]
  21. van Lier, L, "Interaction in the Language Curriculum: Awareness, Autonomy and Authenticity" (1996), Longman
  22. Loh, H, "Recommendation for effective standardized exam preparation", LAK21: 11th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference, pp.397~404 (2021)
  23. "Artificial intelligence in education transformation" (2020)[URL]
  24. Murray, D, "Student perceptions of flipped learning", Australian Computer Science Communications, 37(2), pp.57~62 (2015)
  25. Obari, H., "CALL and Complexity: Short papers from EUROCALL 2019", pp.327~333 (2019), Research-publishing.net
  26. Obari, H., "The impact of AI on teaching EFL in Japan", The Aoyama Journal of Economics, 71(4), pp.29~40 (2020)[DOI]
  27. Obari, H., "CALL for Widening Participation: Short papers from EUROCALL 2020", pp.253~258 (2020), Research-publishing
  28. Pandarova, I., "Predicting the difficulty of exercise items for dynamic difficulty adaptation in adaptive language tutoring", International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 29(3), pp.342~367 (2019)[DOI]
  29. Pannu, A., "Artificial intelligence and its application in different areas", Artificial Intelligence, 4(10), pp.79~84 (2015)
  30. Park, J. H., "Students’ perceptions of artificial intelligence technology and artificial intelligence teachers", The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 34(2), pp.169~192 (2017)[DOI]
  31. Pham, X. L., "Chatbot as an intelligent personal assistant for mobile language learning", Proceedings of the 2018 2nd International Conference on Education and E-Learning, pp.16~21 (2018)
  32. Popenici, S. A., "Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on teaching and learning in higher education", Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(1), pp.1~13 (2017)[DOI]
  33. Self, J., "The defining characteristics of intelligent tutoring systems research : ITSs care, precisely", International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10(3-4), pp.350~364 (1998)
  34. Selwyn, N, "The Wiley Handbook of Educational Policy", pp.457~477 (2018), John Wiley & Sons
  35. Shishido, M, "Proceedings of EdMedia + Innovate Learning", pp.213~218 (2019), Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)
  36. Sirikanjanawong, N., "Relationship between the ICAO language proficiency requirements(LPRs)and test of English for international communication(TOEIC)scores of flight attendants in Thailand", LEARN Journal : Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 11(1), pp.64~86 (2018)
  37. Slavuj, V., "Adaptivity in educational systems for language learning : A review", Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(1-2), pp.64~90 (2017)[DOI]
  38. Song, S. Y., "The prospect and ethical reflection of relationship between AI robots and human beings", The Journal of English Cultural Studies, 10(3), pp.61~83 (2017)[DOI]
  39. Tannenbaum, R. J, "Mapping TOEIC® and TOEIC Bridge™ test scores to the Common European Framework of Reference", The Research Foundation for the TOEIC Tests: A Compendium of Studies, 2, pp.1~10 (2013)
  40. Woolf, B. P, "Building intelligent interactive tutors: Student-centered strategies for revolutionizing e-learning" (2008), Morgan Kaufmann
  41. Yang, H., "Development and application of AI chatbot for cabin crews", Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics, 21, pp.1085~1104 (2021)[DOI]
  42. Yoon, S. Y., "Student readiness for AI instruction : Perspectives on AI in university EFL classrooms", Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 22(4), pp.134~160 (2019)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (3건)