본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

限界動詞の語彙的アスペクトと アスペクト的意味

The study of lexical aspect and aspectual meaning of telic verb in Japanese

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류일본어와문학

초록

This paper treats telic verb's lexical aspect. In the meantime, Japanese academics said, "a verb has only one aspectualmeaning". From the point of view dynamic verb was divided into two types. And each verb showed only one of the two aspectual meanings(progressive aspectand resultative aspect). However, although the verbs are divided finely, this rule(a verb has only oneaspectual meaning)can not be kept. Telic verb in Japanese, as is well known,expressed two aspectual meanings. To solve these problems, this paper was studied in the following perspecves. Firstof all, one telic verb has two types of lexical meaning(action and result). And lexicalmeaning forms a different lexical aspect([-E] and [+E]). As a result, lexical aspectand grammatical aspect combined so they show the progressive aspect and theresultative aspect.

Abstract

This paper treats telic verb's lexical aspect. In the meantime, Japanese academics said, "a verb has only one aspectualmeaning". From the point of view dynamic verb was divided into two types. And each verb showed only one of the two aspectual meanings(progressive aspectand resultative aspect). However, although the verbs are divided finely, this rule(a verb has only oneaspectual meaning)can not be kept. Telic verb in Japanese, as is well known,expressed two aspectual meanings. To solve these problems, this paper was studied in the following perspecves. Firstof all, one telic verb has two types of lexical meaning(action and result). And lexicalmeaning forms a different lexical aspect([-E] and [+E]). As a result, lexical aspectand grammatical aspect combined so they show the progressive aspect and theresultative aspect.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. "CD-ROM版 新潮文庫の 100冊", ~
  2. 天野みどり, "日本語文における<再帰性>について", 日本語と日本文學, 7, pp.1~9 (1987), 筑波大学国語国文学会
  3. 岩本遠億, "事象アスペクト論" (2008), 開拓社
  4. 沖裕子, "アスペクトからみた動詞分類再考―気づかれにくい方言」にふれて―", 人文科学論集, 34, pp.51~68 (2000), 信州大学人文学部
  5. 奥田靖雄, "アスペクトの研究をめぐって", 教育国語, 53, 54(54) (1977)
  6. 奥田靖雄, "ことばの研究・序説", pp.85~143 (1985), むぎ書房
  7. 影山太郎, "動詞意味論-言語と認知の接点-" (1996), くろしお出版
  8. 金田一春彦, "国語動詞の一分類, In 日本語動詞のアスペクト", pp.5~26 (1976), むぎ書房
  9. 北原博雄, "限界性というアスぺクチュアルな性質", 日本語学, 19(5)통권 : 222, pp.72~75 (2000)
  10. 工藤真由美, "シテイル形式の意味記述", 武蔵大学 人文学会雑誌, 13(4), pp.51~88 (1982)
  11. 工藤真由美, "アスペクト⋅テンス体系とテクスト-現代日本語の時間の表現-" (1995), ひつじ書房
  12. 仁田義雄, "再帰動詞、再帰用法−Lexico-Syntax の姿勢から−", 日本語教育, 47, pp.79~90 (1982)
  13. 仁田義雄, "動詞とアスペクト--語彙論的統語論の観点から", 計量国語学, 14(3) (1983)
  14. 仁田義雄, "日本語文法研究序説" (1997), くろしお出版
  15. 仁田義雄, "副詞的表現の諸相" (2002), くろしお出版
  16. 仁田義雄, "語彙論的統語論の観点から", pp.135~153 (2010), ひつじ書房
  17. 外崎淑子, "日本語述語の統語構造と語形成" (2005), ひつじ書房
  18. 益岡隆志, "命題の文法" (1987), くろしお出版
  19. 三原健一, "動詞のアスペクト構造, In ヴォイスとアスペクト", pp.107~196 (1997), 研究社出版
  20. 三原健一, "アスペクト解釈と統語現象" (2004), 松柏社
  21. 睦宗均, "動詞のアスペクトの研究", 박사, pp.2005
  22. 목종균, "상(相)의미의 이행현상과 テイル", 일본언어문화, (12), pp.69~94 (2008), 한국일본언어문화학회
  23. 목종균, "結果相과 再歸性", 일본언어문화, (18), pp.141~162 (2011), 한국일본언어문화학회
  24. 森山卓郎, "アスペクトの意味の決まり方について", 日本語学, 3(12), pp.70~84 (1984), 明治院
  25. 森山卓郎, "日本語動詞述語文の研究" (1988), 明治書院
  26. Vendler、 Zeno, "Linguistics in Philosophy" (1967), Cornell University Press
  27. Smith, Carlota S, "The Parameter of Aspect" (1991), Kluwer Academic Publishers
  28. Dowty, D, "Word Meaning and Montague Grammar" (1979), Kluwer
  29. Jackendoff, R, "Semantic Structure" (1990), MITPress
  30. 박덕유, "국어의 동사상 연구(国語の動詞相研究)" (1998), 한국문화사

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (32건)