학술지 논문게재와 심사자의 학력･연구경력의 상관관계에 대해서

Abstract

This study is to understand the appropriateness of the review in the process of reviewing papers by Korean academic societies. In other words, we are investigating what kind of review is being conducted in the process of reviewing papers, and aim to make proposals for a more rational and reliable system. Since various factors are involved in the publication of submitted papers, comprehensive research is needed, but this time, we will focus on the aspect of judges. In other words, he raised the issue of the influence of the qualifications of the reviewers and their tendencies on the dissertation review. In this way, by classifying the basic data in the dissertation review process, it became clear that although there is a certain flow as a whole, homogeneity cannot be ensured by the method of scoring each reviewer. After all, in order to prevent such deviations in the scores of multiple reviewers, we changed the direction to a system in which one reviewer is in charge of multiple papers in the same field, and dissertations were distributed to a large number of reviewers with different tendencies. The current system of entrusting review should be reviewed. As a future task, let’s try to understand the inconsistency of the examination and the difference in the score due to the tendency of the examiner by comparing the range of the score of each judge with the poster one by one.